Cited by 33Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) ResearchAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Two Behavioral Interventions for Patients with Major Depression and Severe COPD

Open access
Alexopoulos, George S., Sirey, Jo Anne, Banerjee, Samprit, Kiosses, Dimitris N., Pollari, Cristina, Novitch, Richard S., Artis, Amanda, Raue, Patrick J.·2016·The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective Personalized Intervention for Depressed Patients with COPD (PID-C), a treatment mobilizing patients to participate in their care, was found more effective than usual care. To further improve its efficacy, we developed a Problem Solving-Adherence (PSA) intervention integrating problem solving into adherence enhancement procedures. We tested the hypothesis that PSA is more effective than PID-C in reducing depressive symptoms. Exploratory analyses sought to identify patients with distinct depressive symptom trajectories and compare their clinical profiles.Design Randomized controlled trial.Setting Acute inpatient rehabilitation and community.Participants A total of 101 diagnosed with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and major depression after screening 633 consecutive admissions for acute inpatient rehabilitation.Intervention Fourteen sessions of PID-C versus PSA over 26 weeks.Measurements 24-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale.Results PSA was not more efficacious than PID-C in reducing depressive symptoms. Exploratory latent class growth modeling identified two distinct depressive symptoms trajectories. Unlike patients with unfavorable course (28%) who remained symptomatic, patients with favorable course (72%) had a decline of symptoms during the hospitalization followed by a milder decline after discharge. Patients with unfavorable course were younger and had greater scores in disability, anxiety, neuroticism, and dyspnea related limitation in activities and lower self-efficacy scores.Conclusions Both interventions led to sustained improvement depressive symptoms. PID-C matches the skills of clinicians employed by community rehabilitation programs and can be integrated in the care of depressed COPD patients. Patients with severe disability, anxiety, neuroticism, and low self-efficacy are at risk for poor outcomes and in need of close follow-up and targeted interventions. .

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jagp.2016.07.014

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Personalized interventions aiming to increase adherence to treatment for major depression and COPD improved both depressive symptoms and disability.

    “Personalized interventions aiming to increase adherence to treatment for major depression and COPD improved both depressive symptoms and disability165–167.”

    From Mechanisms and treatment of late-life depression (2019) · cites this paper as [165]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 40 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [18]First MB Spitzer RL Williams JBW Gibbon M Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV - patient version (SCID-P) Washington American Psychiatric Press 1995
  2. [22]Epping-Jordan JA Ustun TB The WHODAS-II: leveling the playing field for all disorders WHO Mental Health Bulletin 2000 6 5 6

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Alexopoulos, G. S., Sirey, J. A., Banerjee, S., Kiosses, D. N., Pollari, C., Novitch, R. S., Artis, A., & Raue, P. J.
Affiliations
  • Cornell University (US)
  • Burke Rehabilitation Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Alexopoulos, George S.
Venue
The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-11
Volume
24
Issue
11
Pages
964-974
ISSN
1064-7481 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2477740780
Cited by
33
References
40
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1
FWCI
3.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • NIMH (R01 MH076829, P30 MH085943)
  • Sanchez Foundation
  • Will Rogers Institute
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
major depressive disorder, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, behavioral interventions, problem solving, medication adherence, patient participation in care, personalized interventions, depressive symptom trajectories, inpatient rehabilitation, self-efficacy, anxiety, neuroticism, dyspnea, disability
MeSH terms
Neuroticism, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Anxiety, Major Depressive Disorder, Depressive Disorder, Major, Dyspnea, Female, Hospitalization, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Problem Solving, Severity of Illness Index, Treatment Outcome, Self Efficacy, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review