Cited by 11Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) ResearchCardiac Health and Mental HealthCancer survivorship and care

Two Interventions for Patients with Major Depression and Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Impact on Dyspnea-Related Disability

Open access
Alexopoulos, George S., Sirey, Jo Anne, Banerjee, Samprit, Jackson, Danielle S., Kiosses, Dimitris N., Pollari, Cristina, Novitch, Richard S., Artis, Amanda +1 more·2018·The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective The Personalized Intervention for Depressed Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (PID-C) is an intervention aiming to help patients adhere to their rehabilitation and care. This study tested the hypothesis that the Problem-Solving Adherence (PSA) intervention, which integrates problem-solving into adherence enhancement procedures, reduces dyspnea-related disability more than PID-C. Exploratory analyses sought to identify patients with distinct dyspnea-related disability trajectories and to compare their clinical profiles.Methods In this randomized controlled trial in an acute inpatient rehabilitation and community, 101 participants diagnosed with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and major depression were included after screening 633 consecutive admissions for acute inpatient rehabilitation. Participants underwent 14 sessions of PID-C versus PSA over 26 weeks using the Pulmonary Functional Status and Dyspnea Questionnaire.Results The study hypothesis was not supported. Exploratory latent class growth modeling identified two distinct disability trajectories. Dyspnea-related disability improved in 39% of patients and remained unchanged in the rest. Patients whose dyspnea-related disability improved had more severe disability and less sense of control over their condition at baseline.Conclusion Improvement or no worsening of disability was noted in both treatment groups. This is a favorable course for depressed patients with a severe, deteriorating medical illness. PID-C is compatible with the expertise of clinicians working in community-based rehabilitation programs, and after further testing in the community, it can be integrated in the care of depressed COPD patients.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jagp.2017.10.002

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Personalized interventions aiming to increase adherence to treatment for major depression and COPD improved both depressive symptoms and disability.

    “Personalized interventions aiming to increase adherence to treatment for major depression and COPD improved both depressive symptoms and disability165–167.”

    From Mechanisms and treatment of late-life depression (2019) · cites this paper as [166]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [9]Kaplan RM Toshima M Atkins CJ Adherence to prescribed regimens for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease The Handbook of Health Behavior and Change Shumaker SA Schron EB Ockene JK New York Springer Publishing Co 1990
  2. [16]First MB Spitzer RL Williams JBW Gibbon M Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV - patient version (SCID-P) Washington American Psychiatric Press 1995
  3. [22]Epping-Jordan JA Ustun TB The WHODAS-II: leveling the playing field for all disorders WHO Mental Health Bulletin 2000 6 5 6

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Alexopoulos, G. S., Sirey, J. A., Banerjee, S., Jackson, D. S., Kiosses, D. N., Pollari, C., Novitch, R. S., Artis, A., & Raue, P. J.
Affiliations
  • Weill Cornell Medicine (US)
  • Burke Rehabilitation Hospital (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
Alexopoulos, George S.
Venue
The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-02
Volume
26
Issue
2
Pages
162-171
ISSN
1064-7481 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2763683444
Cited by
11
References
43
Citations by year
2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1
FWCI
1.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01 MH076829, P50 MH113838, T32 MH019132)
  • Sanchez Foundation
  • Will Rogers Institute
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
Keywords
major depressive disorder, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, medication adherence, rehabilitation, disability trajectories, perceived control, community-based rehabilitation, inpatient rehabilitation
MeSH terms
Adult, Behavior Therapy, Depressive Disorder, Major, Major Depressive Disorder, Dyspnea, Female, Humans, Male, Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care, Patient Compliance, Problem Solving, Severity of Illness Index, Comorbidity, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review