Cited by 209Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchCancer-related cognitive impairment studiesHistorical and Modern Theater Studies

Cognitive performance and informant reports in the diagnosis of cognitive impairment and dementia in African Americans and whites

Open access
Potter, Guy G., Plassman, Brenda L., Burke, James R., Kabeto, Mohammed U., Langa, Kenneth M., Llewellyn, David J., Rogers, Mary A.M., Steffens, David C.·2009·Alzheimer's & Dementia

Abstract

Background: The diagnosis of cognitive impairment and dementia must reflect an increasingly diverse and aging United States population. This study compared direct testing and informant reports of cognition with clinical diagnoses of cognitive impairment and dementia between African Americans and whites. Methods: Participants in the Aging, Demographics, and Memory Study completed in‐person dementia evaluations, and were assigned clinical diagnoses (by a consensus panel of dementia experts) of normal; cognitive impairment, not demented (CIND); and dementia. The Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease (CERAD) total score and the Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly (IQCODE) were used to assess cognitive performance and reported cognitive decline. Results: A higher CERAD total score was associated with lower odds of CIND and dementia, at comparable ratios between African Americans and whites. Higher IQCODE scores were associated with increased odds of dementia in both African Americans and whites. Higher IQCODE scores were associated with increased odds of CIND among whites, but not among African Americans. Conclusions: Cultural differences may influence informant reports of prevalent CIND and dementia. Our findings also highlight the need for more comparative research to establish the cultural validity of measures used to diagnose these conditions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jalz.2009.04.1234

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most other prevalence studies indicate that Black older adults are about twice as likely to have Alzheimer's or other dementias as White older adults.

    “Most other prevalence studies also indicate that Black older adults are about twice as likely to have Alzheimer's or other dementias as White older adults.”

    From 2023 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures (2023) · cites this paper as [298]

    The Introduction says some studies found Alzheimer’s disease and dementia prevalence approximately twice as high among African Americans as among whites. It does not say most studies found this: it describes the overall findings as ranging from comparable to higher rates and notes that other studies partly explained the difference through demographic and other factors. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Most other prevalence studies indicate that Black older adults are about twice as likely to have Alzheimer's or other dementias as White older adults.

    “In line with these observations, most other prevalence studies indicate that Black older adults are about twice as likely to have Alzheimer's or other dementias as White older adults.”

    From 2024 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures (2024) · cites this paper as [324]

    The Introduction reports that some studies found Alzheimer’s disease and dementia prevalence approximately twice as high among African Americans as among whites. It does not say most studies found this: it summarizes the literature as showing comparable-to-higher rates, with variation potentially attributable to other factors. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [43]StataCorp Stata Technical Bulletin College Station, TX StataCorp 2000

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Potter, G. G., Plassman, B. L., Burke, J. R., Kabeto, M. U., Langa, K. M., Llewellyn, D. J., Rogers, M. A. M., & Steffens, D. C.
Affiliations
  • Duke Medical Center (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
Corresponding author
Potter, Guy G.
Venue
Alzheimer's & Dementia
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-11
Volume
5
Issue
6
Pages
445-453
ISSN
  • 1552-5260 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-5279
OpenAlex
W2091707237
Cited by
209
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 7
FWCI
4.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Alzheimer s & Dementia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (U01 AG09740, R01 AG027010)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
Keywords
cognitive impairment, dementia diagnosis
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Black or African American, Cognition Disorders, Culture, Dementia, Disability Evaluation, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Population Surveillance, Predictive Value of Tests, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Registries, Sensitivity and Specificity, Cohort Studies, Geriatric Assessment, Observer Variation, Prevalence, Caregivers, Age of Onset, White People

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review