Cited by 239Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchHealth disparities and outcomesMental Health Treatment and Access

Dementia Diagnosis Disparities by Race and Ethnicity

Open access
Lin, Pei-Jung, Daly, Allan T., Olchanski, Natalia, Cohen, Joshua T., Neumann, Peter J., Faul, Jessica D., Fillit, Howard M., Freund, Karen M.·2021·Medical Care

Abstract

Background: Dementia is often underdiagnosed and this problem is more common among some ethnoracial groups. Objective: The objective of this study was to examine racial and ethnic disparities in the timeliness of receiving a clinical diagnosis of dementia. Research Design: This was a prospective cohort study. Subjects: A total of 3966 participants age 70 years and above with probable dementia in the Health and Retirement Study, linked with their Medicare and Medicaid claims. Measures: We performed logistic regression to compare the likelihood of having a missed or delayed dementia diagnosis in claims by race/ethnicity. We analyzed dementia severity, measured by cognition and daily function, at the time of a dementia diagnosis documented in claims, and estimated average dementia diagnosis delay, by race/ethnicity. Results: A higher proportion of non-Hispanic Blacks and Hispanics had a missed/delayed clinical dementia diagnosis compared with non-Hispanic Whites (46% and 54% vs. 41%, P <0.001). Fully adjusted logistic regression results suggested more frequent missed/delayed dementia diagnoses among non-Hispanic Blacks (odds ratio=1.12; 95% confidence interval: 0.91–1.38) and Hispanics (odds ratio=1.58; 95% confidence interval: 1.20–2.07). Non-Hispanic Blacks and Hispanics had a poorer cognitive function and more functional limitations than non-Hispanic Whites around the time of receiving a claims-based dementia diagnosis. The estimated mean diagnosis delay was 34.6 months for non-Hispanic Blacks and 43.8 months for Hispanics, compared with 31.2 months for non-Hispanic Whites. Conclusions: Non-Hispanic Blacks and Hispanics may experience a missed or delayed diagnosis of dementia more often and have longer diagnosis delays. When diagnosed, non-Hispanic Blacks and Hispanics may have more advanced dementia. Public health efforts should prioritize racial and ethnic underrepresented communities when promoting early diagnosis of dementia.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/mlr.0000000000001577

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Missed or delayed diagnoses of Alzheimer's and other dementias are more common among Black and Hispanic older adults than among White older adults.

    “There is evidence that missed or delayed diagnoses of Alzheimer's and other dementias are more common among Black and Hispanic older adults than among White older adults.”

    From 2023 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures (2023) · cites this paper as [236]

  • There is evidence that missed or delayed diagnoses of Alzheimer's and other dementias are more common among Black and Hispanic older adults than among White older adults.

    “There is evidence that missed or delayed diagnoses of Alzheimer's and other dementias are more common among Black and Hispanic older adults than among White older adults.”

    From 2024 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures (2024) · cites this paper as [256]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lin, P.-J., Daly, A. T., Olchanski, N., Cohen, J. T., Neumann, P. J., Faul, J. D., Fillit, H. M., & Freund, K. M.
Affiliations
  • Tufts University (US)
  • Tufts Medical Center (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Alzheimer's Drug Discovery Foundation (US)
Corresponding author
  • Lin, Pei-Jung
  • Daly, Allan T.
  • Olchanski, Natalia
  • Cohen, Joshua T.
  • Neumann, Peter J.
Venue
Medical Care
Published
2021-06-07
Volume
59
Issue
8
Pages
679-686
ISSN
0025-7079 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3171757072
Cited by
239
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 59 · 2025: 64 · 2024: 60 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 2
FWCI
20.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Medical Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (R01AG060165, U01AG009740)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
dementia diagnosis, racial and ethnic disparities, missed diagnosis, delayed diagnosis, non-Hispanic blacks, Hispanic Americans, older adults, cognitive function, functional limitations, dementia severity, early diagnosis
MeSH terms
Missed Diagnosis, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Black or African American, Cognition, Dementia, Ethnicity, Female, Hispanic or Latino, Humans, Male, Prospective Studies, Cohort Studies, Logistic Models, Healthcare Disparities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review