Cited by 145Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchCancer-related cognitive impairment studiesAlzheimer's disease research and treatments

Subjective cognitive decline: self and informant comparisons

Open access
Caselli, Richard J., Chen, Kewei, Locke, Dona E.C., Lee, Wendy, Roontiva, Auttawut, Bandy, Dan, Fleisher, Adam S., Reiman, Eric M.·2014·Alzheimer's & Dementia

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It is unclear whether self- or informant-based subjective cognition better distinguishes emotional factors from early-stage Alzheimer's disease (AD). METHODS: Healthy members (n = 447) of the Arizona apolipoprotein E (APOE) cohort and their informants completed the self and informant paired Multidimensional Assessment of Neurodegenerative Symptoms questionnaire (MANS). RESULTS: Decline on the MANS was endorsed by 30.6% of members and 26.2% of informants. Self- and informant-based decliners had higher scores of psychological distress and slightly lower cognitive scores than nondecliners. Over the next 6.7 years, 20 developed mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Converters were older at entry than nonconverters (63.8 [7.0] vs 58.8 [7.3] years, P = .003), 85% were APOE ε4 carriers (P < .0001), and they self-endorsed decline earlier than informants (58.9 [39.2] vs 28.0 [40.4] months before MCI; P = .002). CONCLUSIONS: Self- and informant-based subjective decline correlated with greater psychological distress and slightly lower cognitive performance. Those with incident MCI generally self-endorsed decline earlier than informants.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jalz.2013.01.003

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In cognitively unimpaired individuals, informant-reported cognitive complaints indicate that these individuals are at increased risk of progression.

    “In cognitively unimpaired individuals, self-reported complaints and complaints reported by an informant should be clearly distinguished, because informant complaints indicate that these individuals are at increased risk of progression110 and merit a closer follow-up with regular clinical and neuropsychological evaluations.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [16]Lezak MD Howieson DB Loring DW Neuropsychological Assessment 4 Oxford University Press New York 2004

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Caselli, R. J., Chen, K., Locke, D. E. C., Lee, W., Roontiva, A., Bandy, D., Fleisher, A. S., & Reiman, E. M.
Affiliations
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • Mayo Clinic in Arizona (US)
Corresponding author
Caselli, Richard J.
Venue
Alzheimer's & Dementia
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-04-05
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
93-98
ISSN
  • 1552-5260 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-5279
OpenAlex
W1975005502
Cited by
145
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 1
FWCI
7.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Alzheimer s & Dementia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (R01AG031581, P30AG19610)
  • Arizona Alzheimer’s Consortium
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
Keywords
subjective cognitive decline, self-report versus informant report
MeSH terms
Acoustic Stimulation, Aged, Apolipoproteins E, Cognition Disorders, Female, Humans, Language Disorders, Male, Middle Aged, Neurologic Examination, Neuropsychological Tests, Psychomotor Performance, Surveys and Questionnaires, Severity of Illness Index, Space Perception, Verbal Learning, Cohort Studies, Executive Function, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review