Cited by 325Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum DisordersAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

The OCI-R: Validation of the subscales in a clinical sample

Huppert, Jonathan D., Walther, Michael R., Hajcak, Greg, Yadin, Elna, Foa, Edna B., Simpson, H. Blair, Liebowitz, Michael R.·2007·Journal of Anxiety Disorders

Abstract

The psychometric properties of the Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory-Revised (OCI-R) subscales have not been validated in a clinical sample of individuals diagnosed with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Data were collected on 186 patients diagnosed with OCD and 17 patients diagnosed with generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) using the OCI-R and the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS). Confirmatory factor analysis revealed an acceptable factor structure. Patients with a given primary symptom subtype were elevated on the corresponding subscale of the OCI-R compared to other OCD patients and patients with GAD. In addition, patients who acknowledged that symptom subtype as present but not primary on the Y-BOCS had elevated OCI-R scores on that scale compared to patients who did not endorse that symptom subtype and patients with GAD. Results indicate that the subscales of the OCI-R are valid measures of six symptom subtypes of OCD. The OCI-R is a psychometrically sound, brief instrument. The current data combined with previous efforts suggest that it is appropriate for clinical and non-clinical populations, and for clinical and research purposes. Further research should examine the sensitivity of the specific subscales to treatment effects, and the potential for adding more items to account for other symptom domains of OCD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.janxdis.2006.05.006

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Huppert, J. D., Walther, M. R., Hajcak, G., Yadin, E., Foa, E. B., Simpson, H. B., & Liebowitz, M. R.
Affiliations
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • New York State Psychiatric Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Huppert, Jonathan D.
Venue
Journal of Anxiety Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007
Volume
21
Issue
3
Pages
394-406
ISSN
0887-6185 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1976550676
Cited by
325
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 39
FWCI
7.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Anxiety Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Yale University
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH045404, K23MH064491, R01MH045436)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory-Revised, obsessive-compulsive disorder, psychometric properties, generalized anxiety disorder, factor structure, Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale, clinical samples
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Severity of Illness Index, Reproducibility of Results, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review