Cited by 87Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum

Characterizing the association between parenting and adolescent social phobia

Open access
Knappe, Susanne, Beesdo-Baum, Katja, Fehm, Lydia, Lieb, Roselind, Wittchen, Hans-Ulrich·2012·Journal of Anxiety Disorders

Abstract

Objectives For characterizing the association between parenting and offspring social phobia (SP), contrasting maternal vs. paternal contributions, putative predictors of unfavorable parenting behaviors and its specificity for SP are warranted to delineate targeted prevention and intervention strategies. Methods A population-based sample of 1053 adolescents was followed-up using the M-CIDI. Parenting was assessed via questionnaire in offspring passing the high risk period for SP-onset. Natal complications and childhood serious health problems as assessed by maternal reports were hypothesized to relate to unfavorable parenting. Results The pattern of maternal overprotection, paternal rejection and lower emotional warmth was associated with SP, but not with other offspring anxiety disorders. Natal complications were related to overprotection and lower emotional warmth; trend-level associations emerged for serious health problems and unfavorable parenting. Conclusions Paternal behavior appears particularly relevant for SP. The pattern of maternal overprotection, paternal rejection and lower emotional warmth was observed in SP only, suggesting that its detailed assessment provides a promising opportunity for targeted prevention and intervention in SP.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.janxdis.2012.02.014

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Knappe, S., Beesdo-Baum, K., Fehm, L., Lieb, R., & Wittchen, H.-U.
Affiliations
  • Technische Universität Dresden (DE)
  • Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE)
  • University of Basel (CH)
Corresponding author
Knappe, Susanne
Venue
Journal of Anxiety Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-06
Volume
26
Issue
5
Pages
608-616
ISSN
0887-6185 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2043396123
Cited by
87
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 6
FWCI
10.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Anxiety Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Qucosa (Saxon State and University Library Dresden) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (LA1148/1-1, WI 709/7-1, WI 709/8-1, WI2246/1-1)
  • Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (01EB 9901/6, 01EB0140, 01EB0440, 01EB9405/6, EB01016200)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
Keywords
parenting, maternal overprotection, paternal rejection, emotional warmth, anxiety disorders, prevention and intervention, parent-offspring association
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Parent-Child Relations, Parents, Phobic Disorders, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Surveys and Questionnaires, Parenting, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review