Cited by 252Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentAttachment and Relationship Dynamics

Interpersonal consequences of social anxiety

Heerey, Erin A., Kring, Ann M.·2007·Journal of Abnormal Psychology

Abstract

The behavioral manifestations of social anxiety may have implications for social outcomes. Unfortunately, little is known about how anxiety shapes social interaction. The present study examined social interactions in dyads consisting of either 2 nonsocially anxious (NSA) individuals or 1 socially anxious (SA) and 1 NSA individual. Behavior, self-reported affect, and perceptions were examined. In comparison with the interactions of NSA pairs, high levels of fidgeting, poor reciprocity of smiling behavior, more self-talk, and more frequent reassurance seeking and giving characterized interactions between SA and NSA participants. Both SA participants and their NSA partners rated their interactions as being less smooth and coordinated than did participants in NSA-NSA dyads. In addition, SA participants' reassurance seeking and self-talk correlated negatively with partner positive affect and perceptions of interaction quality. The authors discuss self-focused attention and the interpersonal consequences of social anxiety.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0021-843x.116.1.125

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This lack of smiling in people with SAD is likely to result in lower liking and pleasure in conversational partners, which has been confirmed in a study that found that conversational partners low in social anxiety did not experience boosts in positive affect when paired with individuals high in social anxiety and that this lack of positive affect was correlated with SAD partner's lack of smiling.

    “This lack of smiling in people with SAD is likely to result in lower liking and pleasure in conversational partners, which has been confirmed in a study that found that conversational partners low in social anxiety did not experience boosts in positive affect when paired with individuals high in social anxiety and that this lack of positive affect was correlated with SAD partner's lack of smiling”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Heerey, E. A., & Kring, A. M.
Affiliations
  • Bangor University (GB)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
Venue
Journal of Abnormal Psychology
Published
2007-02
Volume
116
Issue
1
Pages
125-134
ISSN
  • 0021-843X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1846
OpenAlex
W2143592362
Cited by
252
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 12
FWCI
8.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Abnormal Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
Keywords
social anxiety, interpersonal effects, dyadic interaction, reassurance seeking, self-talk, fidgeting, self-focus, interaction quality, positive affect
MeSH terms
Adult, Affect, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Phobic Disorders, Surveys and Questionnaires, Social Alienation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review