Cited by 33Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentMental Health Research Topics

Examining the incremental contribution of behavioral inhibition to generalized anxiety disorder relative to other Axis I disorders and cognitive-emotional vulnerabilities

Maack, Danielle J., Tull, Matthew T., Gratz, Kim L.·2012·Journal of Anxiety Disorders

Abstract

The goal of the present study was to investigate the incremental contribution of behavioral inhibition system (BIS) sensitivity to the presence of a current generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) diagnosis relative to other Axis I disorders (e.g., major depression, other anxiety disorders) and cognitive-emotional vulnerabilities (e.g., anxiety sensitivity, emotion dysregulation) previously found to be associated with GAD. Participants were 91 individuals recruited from the local community who completed a diagnostic interview and self-report questionnaires. Consistent with expectations, BIS sensitivity emerged as a significant predictor of current GAD status above and beyond major depression, anxiety disorder diagnoses, anxiety sensitivity, emotion dysregulation, and behavioral activation system sensitivity. However, emotion dysregulation also emerged as a significant predictor of GAD status in the final model. Findings speak to the importance of considering BIS sensitivity in models of the development and maintenance of GAD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.janxdis.2012.05.005

Cites

76 of 76 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • SAD has been reported in adolescents characterized in childhood as non-inhibited, and BI has been associated with anxiety disorders more generally, not just with SAD.

    “Nonetheless, as discussed earlier, the converse has been shown, as SAD has been reported in adolescents characterized in childhood as non-inhibited (Hirshfeld-Becker et al., 2007) and BI has been associated with anxiety disorders more generally, not just with SAD (Maack et al., 2012).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 79 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Maack, D. J., Tull, M. T., & Gratz, K. L.
Affiliations
  • University of Mississippi (US)
  • University of Mississippi Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Maack, Danielle J.
Venue
Journal of Anxiety Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-08
Volume
26
Issue
6
Pages
689-695
ISSN
0887-6185 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2071247587
Cited by
33
References
79
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2
FWCI
4.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Anxiety Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
Keywords
generalized anxiety disorder, anxiety sensitivity, emotional dysregulation, major depressive disorder, Axis I disorders
MeSH terms
Adult, Affective Symptoms, Anxiety Disorders, Cognition, Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Inhibition, Psychological, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Psychological, Risk Factors, Comorbidity, Self Efficacy, Resilience, Psychological, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review