Cited by 82Psychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMental Health Treatment and Access

Systematic review and meta-analysis of dropout rates in individual psychotherapy for generalized anxiety disorder

Open access
Gersh, Elon, Hallford, David J., Rice, Simon M., Kazantzis, Nikolaos, Gersh, Hannah, Gersh, Benji, McCarty, Carolyn A.·2017·Journal of Anxiety Disorders

Abstract

Background Despite being a relatively prevalent and debilitating disorder, Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD) is the second least studied anxiety disorder and among the most difficult to treat. Dropout from psychotherapy is concerning as it is associated with poorer outcomes, leads to service inefficiencies and can disproportionately affect disadvantaged populations. No study to date has calculated a weighted mean dropout rate for GAD and explored associated correlates.Methods A systematic review was conducted using PsycINFO, Medline and Embase databases, identifying studies investigating individual psychotherapies for adults with GAD. Forty-five studies, involving 2224 participants, were identified for meta-analysis.Results The weighted mean dropout rate was 16.99% (95% confidence interval 14.42%-19.91%). The Q-statistic indicated significant heterogeneity among studies. Moderator analysis and meta-regressions indicated no statistically significant effect of client age, sex, symptom severity, comorbidity, treatment type, study type (randomized trial or not), study quality, number of sessions or therapist experience.Conclusions In research investigating psychotherapy for GAD, approximately one in six clients can be expected to drop out of treatment. Dropout rate was not significantly moderated by the client, therapist or treatment variables investigated. Future research should specify the definition of dropout, reasons for dropout and associated correlates to assist the field's progression.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.janxdis.2017.10.001

Cites

91 of 91 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gersh, E., Hallford, D. J., Rice, S. M., Kazantzis, N., Gersh, H., Gersh, B., & McCarty, C. A.
Affiliations
  • Seattle Children's Research Institute (US)
  • Deakin University (AU)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • Monash University (AU)
  • University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
Gersh, Elon
Venue
Journal of Anxiety Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-12
Volume
52
Pages
25-33
ISSN
0887-6185 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2763263127
Cited by
82
References
89
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1
FWCI
0.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Anxiety Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
generalized anxiety disorder, psychotherapy dropout, individual psychotherapy
MeSH terms
Adult, Anxiety Disorders, Female, Humans, Male, Patient Dropouts, Psychotherapy, Research Design, Comorbidity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review