Cited by 239Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsPsychological Treatments and Assessments

Meta-Analysis of Cognitive-Behavioral Treatments for Generalized Anxiety Disorder: A Comparison With Pharmacotherapy.

Mitte, Kristin·2005·Psychological Bulletin

Abstract

The efficacy of (cognitive) behavioral therapy ([C]BT) for generalized anxiety disorder was investigated and compared with the efficacy of pharmacological therapy using meta-analytic techniques. A total of 65 (C)BT studies and pharmacological studies were included. (C)BT was more effective than control conditions. The results of the comparison between (C)BT and pharmacotherapy varied according to the meta-analytic methods used. Conclusions about differences in efficacy between therapy approaches are limited when all available studies are included owing to a number of factors that influence effect sizes. When only those studies that directly compared both therapies were included in the analysis, there were no significant differences in efficacy. Attrition rates were lower for (C)BT, indicating that it is better tolerated by patients.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0033-2909.131.5.785

Cites

75 of 75 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 77 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mitte, K.
Affiliations
Friedrich Schiller University Jena (DE)
Corresponding author
Mitte, Kristin
Venue
Psychological Bulletin
Published
2005
Volume
131
Issue
5
Pages
785-795
ISSN
  • 0033-2909 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1455
OpenAlex
W1998351820
Cited by
239
References
77
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 20
FWCI
1.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Bulletin (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
Keywords
generalized anxiety disorder, cognitive behavioral therapy, pharmacotherapy, psychotherapy versus medication, treatment efficacy, attrition rates, treatment tolerability, meta-analytic methods
MeSH terms
Anxiety Disorders, Drug Therapy, Humans, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review