Cited by 147Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychological Treatments and AssessmentsPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Worry exposure versus applied relaxation in the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder

Open access
Hoyer, Jürgen, Beesdo, Katja, Gloster, Andrew T., Runge, Juliane, Höfler, Michael, Becker, Eni S.·2009·Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics

Abstract

Background: Worry exposure (WE) is a core element of cognitive-behavioral treatment for generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). Its efficacy as a stand-alone treatment method (without further cognitive-behavioral therapy interventions) has never been tested.We aimed to examine whether WE alone is as efficacious as the empirically supported stand-alone treatment for GAD, applied relaxation (AR). Methods: In a randomized controlled study, 73 outpatients meeting DSM-IV criteria for GAD as primary diagnosis were allocated to either WE or AR or a waiting list control group; in a 2nd randomization procedure the waiting list subjects were reallocated to WE or AR. The treatment was manualized (15 sessions with WE or AR), included 6-month and 1-year follow-ups, as well as last observation carried forward and completer analyses, and was controlled for allegiance effects.The Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale and the State-Trait Anxiety Scale were used as primary outcome measures. Self-report scales of anxiety, worrying and depression including negative metacognition about worrying and thought suppression served as secondary outcome measures. Results: The dropout rate was moderate. The pre-/posttreatment effects were high for the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (standardized mean difference >1) and for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (standardized mean difference >0.87). The proportion of patients reaching high end state functioning was 48% (WE) and 56% (AR). WE and AR did not differ with regard to dropout rate or treatment effects. The treatment effects were stable at 6 month and 1 year follow-up. Conclusion: This is the first study to show that a stand-alone exposure in sensu technique – WE – is efficacious in the treatment of GAD. Both AR and WE seem to represent effective principles of change in GAD.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000201936

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 37 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. [6]6. Linden M, Zubrägel D, Bär T, Franke U, Schlattmann P: Efficacy of cognitive behav- iour therapy in generalized anxiety disor- ders. Psychother Psychosom 2005; 74: 36- 42.
  2. [8]8. Hunot V, Churchill R, Silva de Lima M, Teix- eira V: Psychological therapies for gener- alised anxiety disorder (review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007; 1:CD001848.
  3. [12]12. Barlow DH, Rapee RM, Brown TA: Behav- ioral treatment of generalized anxiety disor- der. Behav Ther 1992; 23: 551-570.
  4. [24]24. Stöber J: Besorgnis: ein Vergleich dreier In- ventare zur Erfassung allgemeiner Sorgen. Z Diff Diagn Psychol 1995; 16: 50-63.
  5. [31]31. Bassler M, Potratz B, Krauthauser H: The helping alliance questionnaire (HAQ) by Lu- borsky -possibilities for evaluation of the inpatient psychotherapy treatment process. Psychotherapeut 1995; 40: 23-32.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hoyer, J., Beesdo, K., Gloster, A. T., Runge, J., Höfler, M., & Becker, E. S.
Affiliations
  • Technische Universität Dresden (DE)
  • Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
Venue
Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2009
Volume
78
Issue
2
Pages
106-115
ISSN
  • 0033-3190 (ISSN-L)
  • 1423-0348
OpenAlex
W2126294400
Cited by
147
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 10
FWCI
14.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • edoc (University of Basel) (acceptedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • Qucosa (Saxon State and University Library Dresden) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • edoc (University of Basel)
Funders
  • Pfizer
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
generalized anxiety disorder, applied relaxation, cognitive behavioral therapy, thought suppression, dropout
MeSH terms
Adult, Anxiety Disorders, Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Life Change Events, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Relaxation Therapy, Thinking, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review