Cited by 69Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentPsychological Treatments and Assessments

Cognitive-behavior therapy for children and adolescents with anxiety disorders: A meta-analysis of secondary outcomes

Open access
Kreuze, L.J., Pijnenborg, G.H.M., de Jonge, Y.B., Nauta, M.H.·2018·Journal of Anxiety Disorders

Abstract

Anxiety-focused cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) effectively reduces anxiety in children and adolescents. An important remaining question is to what extent anxiety-focused CBT also affects broader outcome domains. Additionally, it remains unclear whether parental involvement in treatment may have impact on domains other than anxiety. A meta-analysis (n studies = 42, n participants = 3239) of the effects of CBT and the moderating role of parental involvement was conducted on the following major secondary outcomes: depressive symptoms, externalizing behaviors, general functioning, and social competence. Randomized controlled trials were included when having a waitlist or active control condition, a youth sample (aged<19) with a primary anxiety disorder diagnosis receiving anxiety-focused CBT and reported secondary outcomes. Controlled effect sizes (Cohen’s d ) were calculated employing random effect models. CBT had a large effect on general functioning (-1.25[-1.59;0.90], n studies = 17), a small to moderate effect on depressive symptoms (-0.31[-0.41;-0.22], n studies = 31) and a small effect on externalizing behaviors (-0.23[-0.38;-0.09], n studies = 12) from pre-to post-treatment. Effects remained or even further improved at follow-up. Social competence only improved at follow-up (n studies = 6). Concluding, anxiety-focused CBT has a positive effect on broader outcome domains than just anxiety. Higher parental involvement seemed to have beneficial effects at follow-up, with improvements in general functioning and comorbid symptoms.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.janxdis.2018.10.005

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Angold, A., Costello, E. J., & Erkanli, A. (1999). Comorbidity. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines, 40(1), 57-87.
  2. Corr, P. J. (2013). Approach and avoidance behavior: Multiple systems and their inter- actions. Emotion Review, 5, 285-290.
  3. Higgins, J. P. T., & Green, S. (Eds.). (2011). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]The Cochrane Collaboration. Available from www.cochrane-handbook.org.
  4. Kendall, P. C., Cummings, C. M., Narayanan, M. K., Birmaher, B., Piacentini, J., Walkup, J., ... Albano, A. M. (2016). Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 84, 1-14.
  5. Kendall, P. C., Hudson, J., Gosch, E., Flannery-Schroeder, E., & Suveg, C. (2008). Child and family therapy for anxiety-disordered youth: Results of a randomized clinical trial. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 76, 282-297.
  6. Review Manager (RevMan) (2014). Computer program]. Version [5.. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kreuze, L. J., Pijnenborg, G. H. M., de Jonge, Y. B., & Nauta, M. H.
Affiliations
University of Groningen (NL)
Corresponding author
Kreuze, L.J.
Venue
Journal of Anxiety Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-12
Volume
60
Pages
43-57
ISSN
0887-6185 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2899500390
Cited by
69
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2
FWCI
0.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Anxiety Disorders (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
faculty of Behavioural and Social sciences from the University of Groningen, the Netherlands
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
Keywords
cognitive behavioral therapy, anxiety disorders, children and adolescents, parental involvement, depressive symptoms, externalizing problems, general functioning, social competence, comorbid symptoms, secondary outcomes
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders, Child, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Parents, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review