The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Media use and acute psychological outcomes during COVID-19 outbreak in China
Open accessAbstract
The COVID-19 outbreak in China led to an extraordinary threat to public health and wellbeing. This study examined the psychological impact of media use among people indirectly exposed to the disease during the initial phase of the outbreak. We conducted an internet-based survey on January 28, 2020 (one week after the official declaration of person-to-person transmission of the coronavirus). Media use (media forms, content of media exposure, and media engagement) related to the outbreak and psychological outcomes (positive and negative affect, anxiety, depression, and stress) of 917 Chinese adults was assessed. A series of multivariable regressions were conducted. The results showed that use of new media, rather than traditional media, was significantly associated with more negative affect, depression, anxiety, and stress. Viewing stressful content (i.e., severity of the outbreak, reports from hospital) was associated with more negative affect and depression. Media engagement was also associated with more negative affect, anxiety, and stress. However, viewing heroic acts, speeches from experts, and knowledge of the disease and prevention were associated with more positive affect and less depression. The study suggested new media use and more media engagement was associated with negative psychological outcomes, while certain media content was associated with positive psychological impact. The present study highlights the need for timely public health communication from official sources and suggests that reduced exposure to new media may be beneficial.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In contrast, receiving information from health professionals or other experts was not associated with negative mental health consequences (Ko et al., 2020; Chao et al., 2020).”
From Lockdown, quarantine measures, and social distancing: Associations with depression, anxiety and distress at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic among adults from Germany (2020) · cites this paper as Chao et al., 2020
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales.
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063 · Cited by 32,433
Lovibond, P. F., & Lovibond, S. H. (1995) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/0005-7967(94)00075-u · Cited by 14,523
Henry, J. D., & Crawford, J. R. (2005) · British Journal of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1348/014466505x29657 · Cited by 5,801
The Social Amplification of Risk: A Conceptual Framework
Kasperson, R. E., Renn, O., Slovic, P., Brown, H. S., Emel, J., Goble, R., Kasperson, J. X., & Ratick, S. (1988) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.1988.tb01168.x · Cited by 2,740
Emotion Elicits the Social Sharing of Emotion: Theory and Empirical Review
Rimé, B. (2009) · Emotion Review · doi:10.1177/1754073908097189 · Cited by 1,546 · cited 1×
“Audiences exposed to these messages are in turn expected to experience and share their own emotional responses (Rimé, 2009).”
Media’s role in broadcasting acute stress following the Boston Marathon bombings
Holman, E. A., Garfin, D. R., & Silver, R. C. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1316265110 · Cited by 513 · cited 2×
“Future studies should further explore possible psychosocial and biological pathways, as previous studies proposed that repeatedly engaging with trauma-related content may encourage ruminative thinking, affect threat appraisals, activate fear circuitry, and contribute to the development of flashbacks (Bourne, Mackay, &…”
Psychosocial effects of an Ebola outbreak at individual, community and international levels
Van Bortel, T., Basnayake, A., Wurie, F., Jambai, M., Koroma, A. S., Muana, A. T., Hann, K., Eaton, J., Martin, S., & Nellums, L. B. (2016) · Bulletin of the World Health Organization · doi:10.2471/blt.15.158543 · Cited by 471
Methodology Review: Evaluating Person Fit
Meijer, R. R., & Sijtsma, K. (2001) · Applied Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/01466210122031957 · Cited by 419
Familism and psychological health: The intervening role of closeness and social support.
Campos, B., Ullman, J. B., Aguilera, A., & Dunkel Schetter, C. (2014) · Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0034094 · Cited by 377
Television Images and Psychological Symptoms after the September 11 Terrorist Attacks
Ahern, J., Galea, S., Resnick, H., Kilpatrick, D., Bucuvalas, M., Gold, J., & Vlahov, D. (2002) · Psychiatry: Interpersonal and Biological Processes · doi:10.1521/psyc.65.4.289.20240 · Cited by 363
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Benke, C., Autenrieth, L. K., Asselmann, E., & Pané-Farré, C. A. (2020) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113462 · Cited by 585
Cauberghe, V., Van Wesenbeeck, I., De Jans, S., Hudders, L., & Ponnet, K. (2021) · Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking · doi:10.1089/cyber.2020.0478 · Cited by 564
“52 The enormous amount of distributed (dis)information on social media may disorient and overwhelm individuals.”
Soroya, S. H., Farooq, A., Mahmood, K., Isoaho, J., & Zara, S.-E. (2020) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2020.102440 · Cited by 639
Why the COVID-19 pandemic is a traumatic stressor
Bridgland, V. M. E., Moeck, E. K., Green, D. M., Swain, T. L., Nayda, D. M., Matson, L. A., Hutchison, N. P., & Takarangi, M. K. T. (2021) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0240146 · Cited by 501
“Recent evidence supports this interpretation: exposure to COVID-19 related news in the initial stages of the outbreak was associated with negative affect, anxiety, depression and stress [21].”
ResultHolman, E. A., Thompson, R. R., Garfin, D. R., & Silver, R. C. (2020) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abd5390 · Cited by 285
“Third, consistent with recent COVID-19 studies, exposure to pandemic-related media coverage was associated with greater pandemic-specific acute stress and depressive symptoms (2, 14).”
BackgroundResult
Metadata
- Authors
- Chao, M., Xue, D., Liu, T., Yang, H., & Hall, B. J.
- Affiliations
- Tianjin Normal University (CN)
- University of Macau (MO)
- Corresponding author
- Liu, Tour
- Venue
- Journal of Anxiety Disorders
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-08
- Volume
- 74
- Pages
- 102248
- ISSN
- 0887-6185 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC7255752
- OpenAlex
- W3029774798
- Cited by
- 300
- References
- 44
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 55 · 2022: 63 · 2021: 84 · 2020: 30
- FWCI
- 21.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Journal of Anxiety Disorders (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Tianjin Philosophy and Social Science Project (TJJX15-002, 18YJC190013)
- Projects of Humanities and Social Sciences, Ministry of Education of China
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
- Social Sciences › Communication › Communication and COVID-19 Impact
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
- Keywords
- COVID-19 pandemic, media use, psychological outcomes, anxiety, depression, stress, negative affect, positive affect, new media, media engagement, public health communication, indirect exposure, Chinese adults
- MeSH terms
- COVID-19, Adult, Anxiety, China, Depression, Disease Outbreaks, Female, Health Education, Humans, Male, Pneumonia, Viral, Public Health, Surveys and Questionnaires, Stress, Psychological, Coronavirus Infections, Internet, Pandemics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
