Cited by 16COVID-19 and Mental HealthCommunication and COVID-19 ImpactPosttraumatic Stress Disorder Research

Media Exposure Predicts Acute Stress and Probable Acute Stress Disorder during the Early COVID-19 Outbreak in China

Open access
Luo, Yu, He, Xiangcai, Wang, Shaofeng, Li, Jinjin, Zhang, Yu·2021·PeerJ

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 has led to unprecedented psychological stress on the general public. However, the associations between media exposure to COVID-19 and acute stress responses have not been explored during the early COVID-19 outbreak in China. METHODS: An online survey was conducted to investigate the relationships between media exposure to COVID-19 and acute stress responses, and to recognize associated predictors of acute stress responses on a sample of 1,450 Chinese citizens from February 3 to February 10, 2020. Media exposure questionnaire related to COVID-19 was developed to assess media exposure time, media exposure forms and media exposure content. The Stanford Acute Stress Reaction Questionnaire (SASRQ) was used to measure acute stress responses, including continuous acute stress symptom scores and the risk of probable acute stress disorder (ASD). A series of regression analyses were conducted. RESULTS: Longer media exposure time and social media use were associated with higher acute stress and probable ASD. Viewing the situation of infected patients was associated with higher acute stress, whereas viewing the latest news about pandemic data was associated with lower odds of probable ASD. Being females, living in Hubei Province, someone close to them diagnosed with COVID-19, history of mental illness, recent adverse life events and previous collective trauma exposure were risk factors for acute stress responses. CONCLUSIONS: These findings confirmed the associations between indirect media exposure to pandemic events and acute stress responses. The governments should be aware of the negative impacts of disaster-related media exposure and implement appropriate interventions to promote psychological well-being following pandemic events.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7717/peerj.11407

Cites

67 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Li Y Chen C 2015 Application of Stanford Acute Stress Reaction Questionnaire in trauma Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice 11 717 722 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2015.06.017 · DOI
  2. Liu P Zhou J Li A 2019 Acute stress reaction and its influencing factors in patients with brain injury Chinese Journal of Gerontology 39 3069 3072 10.3969/j.issn.1005-9202.2019.12.074 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Luo, Y., He, X., Wang, S., Li, J., & Zhang, Y.
Affiliations
Guizhou Normal University (CN)
Corresponding author
He, Xiangcai
Venue
PeerJ
Publisher
PeerJ
Published
2021-05-10
Volume
9
Pages
e11407
ISSN
2167-8359 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3162168318
Cited by
16
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4
FWCI
1.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PeerJ (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Growth Project for Young Science and Technology Talents of Guizhou Province Education Department (Qianjiaohe KY zi [2018])
  • Science and Technology Planning Project of Guizhou Province Science and Technology department (Qiankehe LH zi [2017])
  • Humanities-Society Scientific Research Project of the Higher Education Institutions of Guizhou Province Education Department (2020SSD016)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Communication and COVID-19 Impact
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, media exposure, acute stress, acute stress disorder, social media use, pandemic news, psychological stress, risk factors, Hubei Province, collective trauma, life events, history of mental illness, psychological well-being

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review