Cited by 26Pacific and Southeast Asian StudiesArchaeology and ancient environmental studiesGlobal Maritime and Colonial Histories

Examining dispersal mechanisms for the translocation of chicken (Gallus gallus) from Polynesia to South America

Fitzpatrick, Scott M., Callaghan, Richard·2009·Journal of Archaeological Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jas.2008.09.002

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 57 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fitzpatrick, S. M., & Callaghan, R.
Affiliations
  • North Carolina State University (US)
  • University of Calgary (CA)
Corresponding author
Fitzpatrick, Scott M.
Venue
Journal of Archaeological Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-02
Volume
36
Issue
2
Pages
214-223
ISSN
0305-4403 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2007514609
Cited by
26
References
57
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
4.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Archaeological Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Geography, Planning and Development › Pacific and Southeast Asian Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Global Maritime and Colonial Histories
Keywords
Gallus gallus, Easter Island

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review