Cited by 513

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Accurate sex identification of ancient human remains using DNA shotgun sequencing

Skoglund, Pontus, Storå, Jan, Götherström, Anders, Jakobsson, Mattias·2013·Journal of Archaeological Science

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jas.2013.07.004

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Biological sex, as determined by the karyotype of sex chromosomes in species such as humans, is straightforward to estimate even with only a few thousand random sequences from a human individual.

    “Biological sex, as determined by the karyotype of sex chromosomes in species such as humans (XY in males, XX in females and exceptional karyotypes such as XXY, XYY and others), is straightforward to estimate even with only a few thousand random sequences from a human individual 198 .”

    From Ancient DNA analysis (2021) · cites this paper as [198]

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 47

  1. Adler, 2010, Sexual dimorphism in deciduous crown traits of a European derived Australian sample, Forensic Science International, 199, 29, 10.1016/j.forsciint.2010.02.025 · DOI
  2. Bianchi, 2012, Genome-wide fetal aneuploidy detection by maternal plasma DNA sequencing, Obstretics & Gynecology, 119, 890, 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31824fb482 · DOI
  3. Black, 1978, Sexual dimorphism in tooth-crown diameters of deciduous teeth, American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 48, 77, 10.1002/ajpa.1330480111 · DOI
  4. Black, 1978, A new method for assessing the sex of fragmentary skeletal remains in femoral shaft circumference, American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 48, 227, 10.1002/ajpa.1330480217 · DOI
  5. Briggs, 2007, Patterns of damage in genomic DNA sequences from a Neandertal, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104, 14616, 10.1073/pnas.0704665104 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Brown, 2007, Evaluation of Purkait's triangle method for determining sexual dimorphism, Journal of Forensic Sciences, 52, 553, 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2007.00423.x · DOI
  7. Cardoso, 2008, Sample-specific (universal) metric approaches for determining the sex of immature human skeletal remains using permanent tooth dimensions, Journal of Archaeological Science, 35, 158, 10.1016/j.jas.2007.02.013 · DOI
  8. Cardoso, 2008, Two arch criteria of the ilium for sex determination of immature skeletal remains: a test of their accuracy and an assessment of intra- and inter-observer error, Forensic Science International, 178, 24, 10.1016/j.forsciint.2008.01.012 · DOI
  9. Daskalaki, 2011, Further developments in molecular sex assignment: a blind test of 18th and 19th century human skeletons, Journal of Archaeological Science, 38, 1326, 10.1016/j.jas.2011.01.009 · DOI
  10. Ditch, 1972, Multivariate dental sexing technique, American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 37, 61, 10.1002/ajpa.1330370108 · DOI
  11. Faerman, 1995, Sex identification of archaeological human remains based on amplification of the X and Y amelogenin alleles, Gene, 167, 327, 10.1016/0378-1119(95)00697-4 · DOI
  12. Galdames, 2008, Blind test of mandibular morphology with sex indicator in subadult mandibles, International Journal of Morphology, 26, 845
  13. Gejvall, 1974, Description of the human skeleton from the graves and some associated animal bones, vol. 6, 141
  14. Gibbon, 2009, Novel methods of molecular sex identification from skeletal tissue using the amelogenin gene, Forensic Science International-genetics, 3, 74, 10.1016/j.fsigen.2008.10.007 · DOI
  15. Götherström, 1997, Osteology, DNA and sex identification: morphological and molecular sex identifications of five neolithic individuals from Ajvide, Gotland, International Journal of Osteoarchaeology, 7, 71, 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1212(199701)7:1<71::AID-OA321>3.0.CO;2-K · DOI
  16. Green, 2006, Analysis of one million base pairs of Neanderthal DNA, Nature, 444, 330, 10.1038/nature05336 · DOI
  17. Green, 2010, A draft sequence of the Neandertal genome, Science, 328, 710, 10.1126/science.1188021 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Helgason, 2007, A statistical approach to identify ancient template DNA, Journal of Molecular Evolution, 65, 92, 10.1007/s00239-006-0259-8 · DOI
  19. Hummel, 1991, Y-Chromosome-Specific DNA amplified in ancient human bone, Naturwissenschaften, 78, 266, 10.1007/BF01134353 · DOI
  20. Hunt, 1990, Sex determination in the subadult ilia e an indirect test of weavers nonmetric sexing method, Journal of Forensic Sciences, 35, 881, 10.1520/JFS12900J · DOI
  21. Janzon, 1974, Gotlands Mellanneolitiska Gravar, vol. 6
  22. Kim, 2013, A real-time PCR-based amelogenin Y allele dropout assessment model in gender typing of degraded DNA samples, International Journal of Legal Medicine, 127, 55, 10.1007/s00414-011-0663-5 · DOI
  23. Kjellström, 2004, Evaluations of sex assessment using weighted traits on incomplete skeletal remains, International Journal of Osteoarchaeology, 14, 360, 10.1002/oa.720 · DOI
  24. Krause, 2010, A complete mtDNA genome of an early modern human from Kostenki, Russia, Current Biology, CB, 20, 231, 10.1016/j.cub.2009.11.068 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Lassen, 2000, Molecular sex identification of stillborn and neonate individuals (“Traufkinder”) from the burial site Aegerten, Anthropologischer Anzeiger, 58, 1, 10.1127/anthranz/58/2000/1 · DOI
  26. Liang, 2013, Non-invasive prenatal testing of fetal whole chromosome aneuploidy by massively parallel sequencing, Prenatal Diagnosis, 10.1002/pd.4033 · DOI
  27. Loth, 2001, Sexually dimorphic mandibular morphology in the first few years of life, American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 115, 179, 10.1002/ajpa.1067 · DOI
  28. Malmström, 2005, Extensive human DNA contamination in extracts from ancient dog bones and teeth, Molecular Biology and Evolution, 22, 2040, 10.1093/molbev/msi195 · DOI
  29. Molleson, 1998, Some sexually dimorphic features of the human juvenile skull and their value in sex determination in immature skeletal remains, Journal of Archaeological Science, 25, 719, 10.1006/jasc.1997.0215 · DOI
  30. Morrill, 2008, Sequence length Polymorphisms within primate amelogenin and amelogenin-like genes: usefulness in sex determination, American Journal of Primatology, 70, 976, 10.1002/ajp.20590 · DOI
  31. Murail, 1999, A new approach to sexual diagnosis in past populations. Practical adjustments from Van Vark's procedure, International Journal of Osteoarchaeology, 9, 39, 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1212(199901/02)9:1<39::AID-OA458>3.0.CO;2-V · DOI
  32. Poinar, 2006, Metagenomics to paleogenomics: large-scale sequencing of mammoth DNA, Science, 311, 392, 10.1126/science.1123360 · DOI
  33. Quincey, 2013, Difficulties of sex determination from forensic bone degraded DNA: a comparison of three methods, Journal of Forensic Science Society
  34. Rosing, 1983, Sexing immature human skeletons, Journal of Human Evolution, 12, 149, 10.1016/S0047-2484(83)80020-7 · DOI
  35. Sánchez-Quinto, 2012, Genomic affinities of two 7,000-Year-Old Iberian hunter–gatherers, Current Biology, 22, 1494, 10.1016/j.cub.2012.06.005 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Scheuer, 2002, Brief communication: a blind test of mandibular morphology for sexing mandibles in the first few years of life, American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 119, 189, 10.1002/ajpa.10098 · DOI
  37. Schutkowski, 1993, Sex determination of infant and juvenile skeletons .1. Morphognostic Features, American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 90, 199, 10.1002/ajpa.1330900206 · DOI
  38. Skoglund, 2012, Origins and genetic legacy of Neolithic farmers and hunter-gatherers in Europe, Science, 336, 466, 10.1126/science.1216304 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Stone, 1996, Sex determination of ancient human skeletons using DNA, American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 99, 231, 10.1002/(SICI)1096-8644(199602)99:2<231::AID-AJPA1>3.0.CO;2-1 · DOI
  40. Sullivan, 1993, A rapid and quantitative DNA sex test e fluorescence-based Pcr analysis of X–Y homologous gene amelogenin, Biotechniques, 15, 636
  41. Sutter, 2003, Nonmetric subadult skeletal sexing traits: I. A blind test of the accuracy of eight previously proposed methods using prehistoric known-sex mummies from Northern Chile, Journal of Forensic Sciences, 48, 927, 10.1520/JFS2002302 · DOI
  42. Tschentscher, 2008, Amelogenin sex determination by pyrosequencing of short PCR products, International Journal of Legal Medicine, 122, 333, 10.1007/s00414-008-0228-4 · DOI
  43. Veroni, 2010, Brief communication: sexual dimorphism of the juvenile basicranium, American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 141, 147, 10.1002/ajpa.21156 · DOI
  44. Vlak, 2008, Greater sciatic notch as a sex indicator in juveniles, American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 137, 309, 10.1002/ajpa.20875 · DOI
  45. Weaver, 1980, Sex differences in the ilia of a known sex and age sample of fetal and infant skeletons, American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 52, 191, 10.1002/ajpa.1330520205 · DOI
  46. Wilson, 2008, Morphometric criteria for sexing juvenile human skeletons using the ilium, Journal of Forensic Sciences, 53, 269, 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2008.00656.x · DOI
  47. Wilson, 2010, On the reliability of a geometric morphometric approach to sex determination: a blind test of six criteria of the juvenile ilium, Forensic Science International

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Skoglund, P., Storå, J., Götherström, A., & Jakobsson, M.
Venue
Journal of Archaeological Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-12
Volume
40
Issue
12
Pages
4477-4482
ISSN
0305-4403
Cited by
513
References
9
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review