Cited by 26Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsTelemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationVirtual Reality Applications and Impacts

Computer mediated reality technologies: A conceptual framework and survey of the state of the art in healthcare intervention systems

Open access
Ibrahim, Zear, Money, Arthur G.·2019·Journal of Biomedical Informatics

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The trend of an ageing and growing world population, particularly in developed countries, is expected to continue for decades to come causing an increase in demand for healthcare resources and services. Consequently, demand is growing faster than rises in funding. The UK government, in partnership with the European Commission's Vision for 2020, propose a paradigm shift towards the delivery of more patient-centred self-care interventions, facilitated by novel ubiquitous computer mediated reality technology applications, as a key strategy to overcome the scarcity of health resources gap. If this vision is to become a reality, it is crucial that state of the art research focuses efforts on the development of applications that support the delivery of patient-centred self-care interventions. OBJECTIVES: This study presents a conceptual framework, a system impact assessment taxonomy and systematic literature review of the state of the art in Computer Mediated Reality Technologies (CMRT) research. The intended function of the CMRT applications are considered systematically, with a view to establish the extent to which existing research focuses on delivering digitised, patient-centred healthcare applications, the care contexts in which these are delivered, and the specific CMRTs that are used to deliver such applications. METHODS: A conceptual framework of the state of the art is derived via a systematic concept-centric incremental thematic analysis protocol. The survey considers systems that have been presented within the literature between 2010 and 2017. Primarily, the literature is considered in the context of the type of patient-practitioner relationship that the respective applications support, i.e. Traditional, Collaborative, or Patient-centred care, and the phase of healthcare intervention that is supported i.e. Primary-care, Secondary-Care and Tertiary-care. Inclusion criteria focuses on systematic CMRT implementations and analysis considers a range of clinical contexts (type), settings (location) and system specification concepts consisting of Augmented, Virtual and Mixed Reality technology in conjunction with 3D-Modelling. As a measure of the value added by respective CMRT systems, an impact assessment is carried out according to the National Service Framework Research Quality metric, and via a bespoke overall System Value score metric. RESULTS & CONCLUSION: Several research challenges emerge as a result of surveying the research literature, which include: a large quantity of research effort being focused on invasive surgical procedures through CMRT from a paternalistic Traditional patient-practitioner perspective; lack of research effort in the CMRT healthcare domain that develop ubiquitous systems which specifically target the older population within the home setting; little to no consideration of ecological validity and design architecture for user or interface interaction of systems; current CMRT systems are lacking deployment on ubiquitous mobile platforms; protecting and informing patients when using sensory/camera based CMRT from the privacy of their home through self-assessment means. In terms of impact, Traditional CMRT systems achieve the highest score for Research Quality, and Patient-Centred Systems achieve the highest scores for System Value. In response to these challenges, recommendations and future research directions are proposed to overcome each respective challenge.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103102

Cites

119 of 119 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. A. Liddell, S. Adshead, E. Burgess, Technology in the NHS Transforming the Patient ' S Experience of Care, King's Fund, 2008, pp. 1-61.
  2. A. Kofod-Petersen, How to do a Structured Literature Review in computer science, Doc. released as a Guid. to Perform. a Struct. Lit. Rev. NTNU. Retrieved December, 2014, pp. 1-7.
  3. D.W. Krevelen, Augmented Reality: Technologies, Applications, and Limitations, Research Gate, 2007. Available: < https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Rick_ Van_Krevelen2/publication/292150312_Augmented_Reality_Technologies_ Applications_and_Limitations/links/56ab2b4108aed5a01359c113. pdf > (accessed: 15-Feb-2017).
  4. R.S. Mans, W.M.P. van der Aalst, R.J.B. Vanwersch, Healthcare Processes, Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2015.
  5. T. Reichl, N. Navab, Image-based tracking of the teeth, MICCAI'12 Proc. 15th Int. Conf. Med. Image Comput. Comput. Interv. -vol. Part II, 2012, pp. 601-608.
  6. J.L. Mosso, et al., Virtual reality on mobile phones to reduce anxiety in outpatient surgery vol. 142, IOS Press, 2009.
  7. A.G. Money, A. McIntyre, A. Atwal, G. Spiliotopoulou, T. Elliman, T. French, Bringing the home into the hospital: assisting the pre-discharge home visit process using 3D home visualization software, in: Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), vol. 6768 LNCS, no. PART 4, 2011, pp. 416-426.
  8. S. Weiß et al., Mobile Augmented Reality and 3D Printing to Involve Patients in Treatment Decisions for Prostate Cancer, 2016, pp. 1-6.
  9. D. Bernabei, F. Ganovelli, M. Di Benedetto, M. Dellepiane, R. Scopigno, A low-cost time-critical obstacle avoidance system for the visually impaired, in: Int. Conf. Indoor Position. Indoor Navig., no. September, 2011, pp. 21-23.
  10. I.A. Kakadiaris, M.M. Islam, T. Xie, C. Nikou, A.B. Lumsden, IRay: Mobile AR Using Structure Sensor, in: Adjun. Proc. 2016 IEEE Int. Symp. Mix. Augment. Reality, ISMAR-Adjunct 2016, Sep. 2017, pp. 127-128.
  11. C. Hurter, D. McDuff, Cardiolens, in: ACM SIGGRAPH 2017 Emerging Technologies on -SIGGRAPH '17, 2017, pp. 1-2.
  12. C. Noll, B. Häussermann, U. von Jan, U. Raap, U.-V. Albrecht, Demo: mobile augmented reality in medical education: an application for dermatology, in: Proc. 2014 Work. Mob. Augment. Real. Robot. Technol. Syst., 2014, pp. 17-18.
  13. P. Sigam, M. Denz, Reliability and Accuracy of Wound Surface Measurement Using Mobile Technology, 2015, pp. 1-5.
  14. Chang. Demands, Chang. Dir., vol. 1, 2011, pp. 1377-1383.
  15. S. Sakellariou, B.M. Ward, V. Charissis, D. Chanock, P. Anderson, 20-Design and Implementation of Augmented Reality environment for complex anatomy training-inguinal canal case study, Shumaker R. Virtual Mix. Reality, VMR 2009, vol. 5622, 2009, pp. 605-614.
  16. S. Park, S. Park, H. Kautz, Privacy-preserving recognition of activities in daily living from multi-view silhouettes and RFID-based training, in: AAAI Symp.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ibrahim, Z., & Money, A. G.
Affiliations
Brunel University of London (GB)
Corresponding author
Money, Arthur G.
Venue
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-02
Volume
90
Pages
103102
ISSN
1532-0464 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2910542102
Cited by
26
References
119
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3
FWCI
0.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Biomedical Informatics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Brunel University Research Archive (BURA) (Brunel University London) (submittedVersion)
  • Brunel University Research Archive (BURA) (Brunel University London) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (1819220)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
Keywords
augmented reality, virtual reality, mixed reality, 3D modeling, patient-practitioner relationship, ubiquitous computing, older adults, home care, surgical training, healthcare resource shortages, conceptual framework, ecological validity, user interface design
MeSH terms
Virtual Reality, Augmented Reality, Delivery of Health Care, Humans, Patient-Centered Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review