Cited by 500Virtual Reality Applications and ImpactsDigital Mental Health InterventionsPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Virtual Reality in the Psychological Treatment for Mental Health Problems: An Systematic Review of Recent Evidence

Open access
Valmaggia, Lucia R., Latif, Leila, Kempton, Matthew J., Rus-Calafell, Maria·2016·Psychiatry Research

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to provide a review of controlled studies of the use of Virtual Reality in psychological treatment (VRT). Medline, PsychInfo, Embase and Web of Science were searched. Only studies comparing immersive virtual reality to a control condition were included. The search resulted in 1180 articles published between 2012 and 2015, of these, 24 were controlled studies. The reviewed studies confirm the effectiveness of VRT compared to treatment as usual, and show similar effectiveness when VRT is compared to conventional treatments. Current developments and future research are discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.psychres.2016.01.015

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several VR interventions have recently been aimed at addressing mental health conditions and increasing the accessibility of mental health services.

    “Several virtual reality (VR) interventions have recently been aimed at addressing mental health conditions and increasing the accessibility of mental health services to society [8,9,10,11,12,13].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 37 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Valmaggia, L. R., Latif, L., Kempton, M. J., & Rus-Calafell, M.
Affiliations
King's College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Valmaggia, Lucia R.
Venue
Psychiatry Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-02
Volume
236
Pages
189-195
ISSN
0165-1781 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2249279987
Cited by
500
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 42 · 2025: 51 · 2024: 49 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 78 · 2020: 63 · 2019: 48 · 2018: 48 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 1
FWCI
8.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychiatry Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health at the South London
  • Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Psychiatry King’s College London
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
virtual reality therapy, immersive virtual reality, psychological intervention, mental illness, treatment effectiveness, psychotherapy
MeSH terms
Mental Disorders, Humans, Treatment Outcome, Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic, Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review