Cited by 31Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychological Treatments and AssessmentsPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Comparing visual and auditory presentation for the modification of interpretation bias

Standage, Helen, Ashwin, Chris, Fox, Elaine·2009·Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry

Abstract

This experiment compares the effects of visual vs. auditory presentation of cognitive bias modification (CBM) training scenarios upon interpretation style and emotional vulnerability. For both modalities, negative, but not positive interpretation biases were successfully induced relative to a baseline. Mood declined for the auditory but not the visual group throughout the CBM procedure, irrespective of the valence of the CBM condition. This deterioration in mood raises an important methodological issue and indicates that the increased testing time brought about by auditory compared to visual presentation needs to be addressed. The CBM procedures did not influence emotional vulnerability as assessed by behavioural measures, but counter-to-prediction, CBM procedures did increase self-reported depression vulnerability for the positive but not negative CBM condition.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jbtep.2009.07.006

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Standage, H., Ashwin, C., & Fox, E.
Affiliations
University of Essex (GB)
Corresponding author
Standage, Helen
Venue
Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-12
Volume
40
Issue
4
Pages
558-570
ISSN
0005-7916 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1979430502
Cited by
31
References
37
Citations by year
2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
FWCI
4.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Open Access at Essex (University of Essex) (submittedVersion)
Funders
University of Essex
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
cognitive bias modification, interpretation bias, visual presentation, auditory presentation, mood, emotional vulnerability, depression vulnerability, cognitive training, presentation modality
MeSH terms
Acoustic Stimulation, Adolescent, Adult, Affect, Aged, Analysis of Variance, Anxiety, Cognition, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Photic Stimulation, Stress, Psychological, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Bias, Recognition, Psychology, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review