Cited by 143Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychological Treatments and AssessmentsNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Induced biases in emotional interpretation influence stress vulnerability and endure despite changes in context

Mackintosh, Bundy, Mathews, Andrew, Yiend, Jenny, Ridgeway, Valerie, Cook, Emma·2006·Behavior Therapy

Abstract

Previous research has shown that interpretation biases can be experimentally induced and endure for 24 hours. In two experiments, we show that induced biases not only persist but survive changes in environmental context, including transferring to different rooms with different experimenters. In one experiment, training and testing materials were also presented in different sensory modalities without significantly reducing the magnitude of the induced bias. Furthermore, we found evidence of changes in emotional vulnerability, congruent with the direction of induced bias, which also persisted for 24 hours. Together with earlier results, these findings show that induced biases generalize over contexts and have persisting emotional consequences, suggesting that appropriately adapted training methods may contribute to developing therapeutic techniques within clinical settings.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.beth.2006.03.001

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mackintosh, B., Mathews, A., Yiend, J., Ridgeway, V., & Cook, E.
Affiliations
  • MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit (GB)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Mackintosh, Bundy
Venue
Behavior Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-09
Volume
37
Issue
3
Pages
209-222
ISSN
0005-7894 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2162368049
Cited by
143
References
22
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 15
FWCI
9.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behavior Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
  • UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Wellcome Trust (074073)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
interpretation bias, emotional interpretation, stress vulnerability, context generalization, sensory modalities, emotional vulnerability, cognitive bias modification, emotion regulation training
MeSH terms
Acoustic Stimulation, Affect, Analysis of Variance, Anxiety, Discrimination, Psychological, Emotions, Environment, Generalization, Psychological, Humans, Language, Photic Stimulation, Reference Values, Set, Psychology, Stress, Psychological, Time Factors, Verbal Behavior, Comprehension

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review