Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 407

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Green buying behavior and the theory of consumption values: A fuzzy-set approach

Open access
Gonçalves, Helena Martins, Lourenço, Tiago Ferreira, Silva, Graça Miranda·2016·Journal of Business Research
DOI 10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.10.129
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.10.129

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Research works printed but not linked: 34

  1. Akehurst, 2012, Re-examining green purchase behavior and the green consumer profile: New evidences, Management Decision, 50, 972, 10.1108/00251741211227726 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Basedau, 2014, Why do some oil exporters experience civil war but others do not? Investigating the conditional effects of oil, European Political Science Review, 6, 549, 10.1017/S1755773913000234 · DOI
  3. Bei, 1995, The determinants of consumers purchase decisions for recycled products: An application of acquisition-transaction utility theory, Advances in Consumer Research, 22, 257
  4. Diamantopoulos, 2003, Can socio-demographics still play a role in profiling green consumers? A review of the evidence and an empirical investigation, Journal of Business Research, 56, 465, 10.1016/S0148-2963(01)00241-7 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Finch, 2005, The impact of personal consumption values and beliefs on organic food purchase behavior, Journal of Food Products Marketing, 11, 63, 10.1300/J038v11n04_05 · DOI
  6. Fiss, 2013, Opposites attract? Opportunities and challenges for integrating large-N QCA and econometric analysis, Political Research Quarterly, 66, 191
  7. Fraj, 2006, Influence of personality on ecological consumer behavior, Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 5, 167, 10.1002/cb.169 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Holbrook, 1996, Customer value—A framework for analysis and research, Advances in Consumer Research, 23, 138
  9. Kilbourne, 2008, How materialism affects environmental beliefs, concern, and environmentally responsible behavior, Journal of Business Research, 61, 885, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.09.016 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Kim, 2005, Antecedents of green purchase behavior: An examination of collectivism, environmental concern, and PCE, Advances in Consumer Research, 32, 592
  11. Lee, 2002, A cross-cultural study on the value structure of mobile internet usage: Comparison between Korea and Japan, Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 3, 227
  12. Leroi-Werelds, 2014, Assessing the value of commonly used methods for measuring customer value: A multi-setting empirical study, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 42, 430, 10.1007/s11747-013-0363-4 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Lin, 2012, The influence factors on choice behavior regarding green products based on the theory of consumption values, Journal of Cleaner Production, 22, 11, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.10.002 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Long, 2000, Consumption values and relationships: Segmenting the market for frequency programs, Journal of Consumer Marketing, 17, 214, 10.1108/07363760010329201 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Mackie, 1965, Causes and conditions, American Philosophical Quarterly, 2, 245
  16. Mas-Verdú, 2015, Firm survival: The role of incubators and business characteristics, Journal of Business Research, 68, 793, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.11.030 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Minton, 1997, The effects of environmental concern on environmentally friendly consumer behavior: An exploratory study, Journal of Business Research, 40, 37, 10.1016/S0148-2963(96)00209-3 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Ordanini, 2014, When the recipe is more important than the ingredients a qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) of service innovation configurations, Journal of Service Research, 17, 134, 10.1177/1094670513513337 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Oslo Symposium
  20. Ottman, 2006, Avoiding green marketing myopia: Ways to improve consumer appeal for environmentally preferable products, Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 48, 22, 10.3200/ENVT.48.5.22-36 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Park, 2009, Cultural value, consumption value, and global brand image: cross-national study, Psychology and Marketing, 26, 714, 10.1002/mar.20296 · DOI
  22. Pura, 2005, Linking perceived value and loyalty in location-based mobile services, Managing Service Quality: An International Journal, 15, 509, 10.1108/09604520510634005 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Sánchez-Fernández, 2007, The concept of perceived value: A systematic review of the research, Marketing Theory, 7, 427, 10.1177/1470593107083165 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Schlegelmilch, 1996, The link between green purchasing decisions and measures of environmental consciousness, European Journal of Marketing, 30, 35, 10.1108/03090569610118740 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Schwarts, 1987, Toward a universal psychological structure of human values, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 550, 10.1037/0022-3514.53.3.550 · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.53.3.550 · Paper page
  26. Sheth, 1991, Why we buy what we buy: A theory of consumption values, Journal of Business Research, 22, 159, 10.1016/0148-2963(91)90050-8 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Sweeney, 2001, Consumer perceived value: The development of a multiple item scale, Journal of Retailing, 77, 203, 10.1016/S0022-4359(01)00041-0 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Wang, 2013, What affects mobile application use? The roles of consumption values, International Journal of Marketing Studies, 5, 11, 10.5539/ijms.v5n2p11 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Webster, 1975, Determining the characteristics of the socially conscious consumer, Journal of Consumer Research, 2, 188, 10.1086/208631 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Welsch, 2011, Are pro-environmental consumption choices utility-maximizing? Evidence from subjective well-being data, Ecological Economics, 72, 75, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.04.015 · DOI
  31. Wier, 2008, The character of demand in mature organic food markets: Great Britain and Denmark compared, Food Policy, 33, 406, 10.1016/j.foodpol.2008.01.002 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Williams, 2009, Value, satisfaction and behavioral intentions in an adventure tourism context, Annals of Tourism Research, 36, 413, 10.1016/j.annals.2009.02.002 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Woodside, 2013, Moving beyond multiple regression analysis to algorithms: Calling for adoption of a paradigm shift from symmetric to asymmetric thinking in data analysis and crafting theory, Journal of Business Research, 66, 463, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.12.021 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Young, 2008, When do energy-efficient appliances generate energy savings? Some evidence from Canada, Energy Policy, 36, 34, 10.1016/j.enpol.2007.09.011 · DOI

Cited by

See all 407

Metadata

Authors
Gonçalves, H. M., Lourenço, T. F., & Silva, G. M.
Venue
Journal of Business Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-04
Volume
69
Issue
4
Pages
1484-1491
ISSN
0148-2963 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.10.129
OpenAlex
W1862914640
Cited by
407
References
8
FWCI
28.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Green buying behavior and the theory of consumption values: A fuzzy-set approach. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.10.129
The paper
Gonçalves, H. M., Lourenço, T. F., & Silva, G. M. (2016). Green buying behavior and the theory of consumption values: A fuzzy-set approach. Journal of Business Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.10.129

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.