Health, well-being, and persisting symptoms in the pandemic: What is the role of psychological flexibility?
Open accessAbstract
Finding psychological factors that can reduce the substantial impact of COVID-19 on mental and physical health is important. Here we replicate and expand a previous study regarding the role of psychological flexibility (PF) in this context. We employed a comprehensive and well validated measure of PF and examined its role in relation to health outcomes and persistent post COVID-19 symptoms. 1174 participants completed standardized measures of depression, anxiety, insomnia and the Multidimensional Psychological Flexibility Inventory (MPFI), and reported the presence of persistent symptoms associated with “long COVID.” All PF and psychological inflexibility (PI) facets, except for acceptance, correlated with the three mental health outcomes and with persistent symptoms. PF and PI accounted for significant variance in depression, anxiety, and insomnia after adjusting for background and health status variables. A notable finding was the particularly stronger correlations obtained for the PI facets. Our findings emphasize the potentially mitigating effects of PF on mental ill health, as well as the particularly aggravating effects of PI, in the pandemic context. A novel finding is the significant association of PI with persisting symptoms of COVID. © 2022 The Authors
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
6 of 16 cited sources checked · 6 supported · 0 flagged
- Interpretationcitation
Because this also occurred in prior MPFI research in Italy, it likely is not unique to the Swedish version or setting.
“The fact that this has happened in previous research with the MPFI in Italy (Pakenham et al., 2020) suggests that this is not a problem specific to the Swedish translation or context.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Pakenham et al., 2020 source
- Findingown data
Prediction of insomnia was less successful than depression and anxiety, as variance accounted for by PF and PI facets was much less.
“Overall, prediction of insomnia was less successful as the variance accounted for in this outcome from the PF and PI facets was much less compared to the results for depression and anxiety.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Ten of 14 correlations between MPFI scores and persistent physical symptoms were significant at p < .001.
“For persistent physical symptoms ten of 14 correlations were significant at p < .001.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Persistent symptoms coefficients in final equations were smaller in PI analyses relative to PF analyses.
“The coefficients for the persistent symptoms in the final equations also were smaller relative to the equations calculated for PF.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Acceptance showed no correlation with any outcome.
“The acceptance subscale did not correlate with any of the outcomes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Findingown data
The persistent symptom summary explained the greatest share of variance in depression (25%), anxiety (17%), and insomnia (16%) within the PF regression models.
“The fourth block including the persistent symptoms summary accounted for the largest proportion of variance in the equations including 25% for depression, 17% for anxiety, and 16% for insomnia.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Findings for the acceptance subscale diverged from expectations.
“On the other hand, the results related to the acceptance subscale were not as expected.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Committed action had a significant regression coefficient for depression.
“Committed action also obtained a significant coefficient in relation to depression.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The mental health history coefficient decreased by about half in the PI analyses compared with the PF analyses.
“The coefficients that shrank the most when the inflexibility facets were analyzed, relative to the flexibility facets, were the ones for the mental health history variable, which shrank by approximately 50%.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Every psychological flexibility and inflexibility facet other than acceptance was associated with depression, anxiety, and insomnia.
“All PF and psychological inflexibility (PI) facets, except for acceptance, correlated with the three mental health outcomes and with persistent symptoms.”
- Also stated in: § Correlation analyses · plain
“For depression, anxiety, and insomnia, every other facet of flexibility and inflexibility and the overall dimension scores correlated in the expected direction, at p < .001.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Correlation analyses · plain
- Findingown data
Defusion was the strongest individual PF predictor, with standardized coefficients second only to persistent physical symptoms.
“Defusion was clearly the strongest individual predictor with standardized regression coefficients second in magnitude only to those obtained by the persistent physical symptoms.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Within the PI models, fusion consistently emerged as a stronger unique predictor across all outcomes.
“This time fusion was a consistent stronger unique predictor for each outcome”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The persistent symptom summary explained the greatest share of variance in mental health outcomes.
“The set of persistent symptoms played a significant role in predicting mental health, accounting for the largest proportions of variance.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
PI facets showed stronger correlations with outcomes than PF facets.
“A notable finding was the particularly stronger correlations obtained for the PI facets.”
- Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
“as was our result that inflexibility facets correlate more strongly with outcomes compared to the flexibility facets”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
- Findingown data
Psychological inflexibility had a significant link to long-COVID symptoms.
“A novel finding is the significant association of PI with persisting symptoms of COVID.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The study extends earlier work by newly examining persistent symptoms alongside psychological flexibility.
“Having said this, we do expand previous findings by our novel inclusion of persistent symptoms in relation to PF.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductreasoning
The cross-sectional observational design restricts causal conclusions about which variables affect others.
“The cross-sectional observational methods employed naturally limit conclusions regarding which variables exert influence on which other variables.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 16
- May combine two claims. 19
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationLong COVID involves ongoing symptoms that appear right after COVID-19 infection.
“Long COVID includes persisting symptoms, following directly after an infection with the COVID-19 virus”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checkedClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationCertain psychosocial studies point to psychological flexibility as a key target for treating and helping affected individuals recover.
“Some of these identify psychological flexibility, or the ability to act with openness, awareness, and engagement (Hayes et al., 2006) as an important target in the treatment and recovery of those adversely affected”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 3 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductcitationPHQ-9 has adequate validity and internal consistency.
“The PHQ-9 has shown to have adequate validity and internal consistency, α = 0.89 (0.88 in the current sample)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataThe MPFI generally performed well across most aspects.
“On a practical note the MPFI, newly translated and validated in Swedish, appeared to perform well in most respects”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAmong flexibility facets, seven of 24 correlations with persistent symptoms were medium, none large, 13 small or less than small, four.
“Amongst the flexibility facets seven of 24 correlations were medium-sized, none were large, and the remainder, 13, were small, or less than small, four.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown data90.5% of participants were women.
“Mean age was 47.8 years (SD = 11.5) and 90.5% of participants were women.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataSelf-as-content significantly predicted depression and anxiety, and inaction did as well.
“self-as-content was also significant in predicting depression and anxiety, as was inaction.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataTotal R-square values for PF equations were .54 for depression, .43 for anxiety, and .32 for insomnia.
“Total R-square values for the equations were respectable at .54 for depression, 0.43 for anxiety and 0.32 for insomnia.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAmong inflexibility facets, eight of 24 correlations with persistent symptoms were large, seven medium, nine small.
“Amongst the inflexibility facets, eight of 24 correlations were large, seven were medium, and nine were small.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFive PF facets (all except acceptance) correlated significantly with persistent post-COVID symptoms, with small correlations.
“Here five of the PF facets (with the exception of acceptance) correlated significantly with these symptoms, albeit the correlations were small in size.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataPF facets accounted for significant additional variance in depression (7.6%), anxiety (8.1%), and insomnia (3.0%) after adjusting for background, health status, COVID-19 infection, and persistent symptoms.
“And finally, the variance accounted for by the psychological flexibility facets entered in the final block was significant in each case, including 7.6% for depression, 8.1% for anxiety, and 3.0% for insomnia.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataPI facets accounted for significant additional variance in depression (18%), anxiety (23%), and insomnia (8%) after adjusting for background, health status, COVID-19 infection, and persistent symptoms.
“Another difference was in the final block where variance accounted for at entry was substantially greater, 18% for depression, 23% for anxiety, and 8% for insomnia.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe findings imply either that acceptance does not matter here or that the subscale needs improvement.
“The results obtained suggest either that acceptance is irrelevant in this context, an interpretation that seems unlikely given the weight of evidence to the contrary, or that the subscale requires some revision or refinement.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe female predominance might stem from recruitment distortion, though the exact reason is unknown.
“That 90.5% were women may be a result of some kind of distortion in the recruitment process, but the nature of this is unclear.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataPsychological flexibility is a worthwhile target for improving broad health and well-being during the pandemic, covering both typical effects and long-COVID symptoms.
“This finding is relevant from a clinical and public health perspective as it indicates that the capacity for psychological flexibility is a target for enhancing health and well-being broadly in the pandemic context, both for the generally expected impacts but also for the unexpected persistent post COVID symptoms.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
Interpretationown dataThe results strengthen the evidence that psychological flexibility matters for future treatment design in pandemic-related mental health and well-being.
“Our findings may not be entirely new but add reliability and generality to the evidence base for PF as an important factor in future treatment designs for mental health and well-being in the pandemic context.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningSocial media recruitment likely yielded a biased sample, perhaps including those most affected or worried.
“The recruitment via social media seems to have produced a selected sample, possibly a sample of those most affected or most concerned.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationSelf-report data may be susceptible to bias and distortion.
“Of course, self-report measures can be open to bias and distortion”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Podsakoff et al., 2003 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningWhether the findings generalize remains uncertain pending further research.
“In any case, generalizability remains a question until further studies are done.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningInterventions that increase psychological flexibility could help individuals with complex ongoing mental and physical conditions after COVID-19.
“It appears that methods to enhance psychological flexibility may also benefit people who suffer with complex persistent mental and physical health conditions following COVID-19.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAn earlier Swedish survey found that 84.5% reported at least one of 25 persistent symptoms, while 49.7% linked one or more to COVID-19.
“In a previous study including 1482 participants surveyed in Sweden 84.5% reported at least one of 25 persistent symptoms, and 49.7% attributing one or more of these to COVID-19 infection”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Brocki et al., 2022
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductcitationSwedish version of MPFI has been found reliable with sufficient support for validity.
“The instrument has been translated and validated in Swedish and this version has been found to be a reliable instrument with sufficient support for validity”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Tabrizi et al., 2022
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductcitationThe GAD-7 demonstrated strong psychometric properties in the general population and adequate internal consistency.
“The GAD-7 has shown strong psychometric properties in the general population, including adequate internal consistency, α = 0.89 (0.89 in the current sample)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Löwe et al., 2008
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Spitzer et al., 2006 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductcitationISI has good validity and internal consistency in population-based sample.
“In a population-based sample the validity and internal consistency were good, α = 0.90 (0.91 in current sample)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bastien et al., 2001 source
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductcitationMPFI has adequate validity and reliability.
“Studies show that MPFI has adequate validity and reliability”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Landi, Pakenham, Crocetti, et al., 2021a, 2021b
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Rolffs et al., 2018 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenPersistent symptom measure represents evidence-based list but not validated psychometric instrument.
“although the persistent symptom measure used in this study represents an evidence-based list of symptoms, it does not constitute a validated psychometric instrument.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataPsychological flexibility might protect against poor mental and physical health during the pandemic, while inflexibility might worsen it.
“Our results are consistent with the growing number of studies, showing that psychological flexibility may play a protective role against poor physical and mental health in the pandemic context, and that inflexibility does the opposite”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
The role of psychological flexibility had not been examined in relation to long-COVID symptoms.
“Importantly, the role of PF has not been addressed in relation to these symptoms.”
The paper relies on this without support.
At the time of the earlier Swedish study, the MPFI had not been successfully translated and validated in Swedish.
“At the time that the study of PF and mental health in the pandemic was conducted in Sweden this measure had not been successfully translated and validated in Swedish.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Psychological flexibility was found as a predictor of lower levels of insomnia severity.
“Psychological inflexibility was found as a predictor of higher levels of insomnia severity (Daly-Eichenhardt et al., 2016;El Rafihi-Ferreira et al., 2022;McCracken et al., 2011;McCracken et al., 2021;McCracken et al., 2022;McCracken et al., 2023;Zakiei et al., 2022), whereas psychological flexibility was found as a predictor of lower levels of insomnia severity (McCracken et al., 2022;McCracken et”
From Psychological inflexibility as a predictor associated with insomnia (2024) · cites this paper as McCracken et al., 2022
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
GAD-7 maximum score is too high
MinorSeven items scored from 0 to 3 yield a maximum of 21, not 27.
Reported 27 · recomputed 21
“Scores for the GAD-7 ranges from 0 to 27 based on items rated on a 4-point raring scale, from 0 = “not at all” to 3 = “nearly every day.””
Cites
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 · Cited by 82,194 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Of course, self-report measures can be open to bias and distortion (Podsakoff et al., 2003) and we should seek to replicate these findings with other sources of data.”
BackgroundHarris, P. A., Taylor, R., Thielke, R., Payne, J., Gonzalez, N., & Conde, J. G. (2009) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010 · Cited by 51,384 · see citing works
The PHQ-9: Validity of a brief depression severity measure
Kroenke, K., Spitzer, R. L., & Williams, J. B. W. (2001) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x · Cited by 44,910 · see citing works
A Brief Measure for Assessing Generalized Anxiety Disorder: The GAD-7
Spitzer, R. L., Kroenke, K., Williams, J. B. W., & Löwe, B. (2006) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092 · Cited by 31,765 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The GAD-7 is a measure of anxiety symptoms (Spitzer et al., 2006).”
BackgroundThe REDCap consortium: building an international community of software platform partners
Harris, P. A., Taylor, R., Minor, B. L., Elliott, V., Fernandez, M., O'Neal, L., McLeod, L., Delacqua, G., Delacqua, F., Kirby, J., et al. (2019) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103208 · Cited by 24,013 · see citing works
Validation of the Insomnia Severity Index as an outcome measure for insomnia research
Bastien, C. (2001) · Sleep Medicine · doi:10.1016/s1389-9457(00)00065-4 · Cited by 8,067 · see citing works
Acceptance and commitment therapy: model, processes and outcomes
Hayes, S. C., Luoma, J. B., Bond, F. W., Masuda, A., & Lillis, J. (2006) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2005.06.006 · Cited by 6,587 · see citing works
The PHQ-9: A New Depression Diagnostic and Severity Measure
Kroenke, K., & Spitzer, R. L. (2002) · Psychiatric Annals · doi:10.3928/0048-5713-20020901-06 · Cited by 5,898 · see citing works
Nalbandian, A., Sehgal, K., Gupta, A., Madhavan, M. V., McGroder, C., Stevens, J. S., Cook, J. R., Nordvig, A. S., Shalev, D., Sehrawat, T. S., et al. (2021) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-021-01283-z · Cited by 4,862 · see citing works
Long covid—mechanisms, risk factors, and management
Crook, H., Raza, S., Nowell, J., Young, M., & Edison, P. (2021) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.n1648 · Cited by 1,655 · see citing works
Depression, anxiety and somatization in primary care: Syndrome overlap and functional impairment
Löwe, B., Spitzer, R. L., Williams, J. B. W., Mussell, M., Schellberg, D., & Kroenke, K. (2008) · General Hospital Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2008.01.001 · Cited by 706 · see citing works
Rolffs, J. L., Rogge, R. D., & Wilson, K. G. (2018) · Assessment · doi:10.1177/1073191116645905 · Cited by 504 · see citing works
Dawson, D. L., & Golijani-Moghaddam, N. (2020) · Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science · doi:10.1016/j.jcbs.2020.07.010 · Cited by 445 · see citing works
Beard, C., & Björgvinsson, T. (2014) · Journal of Anxiety Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2014.06.002 · Cited by 360 · see citing works
Psychological flexibility as a malleable public health target: Evidence from a representative sample
Gloster, A. T., Meyer, A. H., & Lieb, R. (2017) · Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science · doi:10.1016/j.jcbs.2017.02.003 · Cited by 272 · see citing works
Mahmud, S. A. S., Hossain, S., Muyeed, A., Islam, M. M., & Mohsin, M. (2021) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07393 · Cited by 216 · see citing works
Pakenham, K. I., Landi, G., Boccolini, G., Furlani, A., Grandi, S., & Tossani, E. (2020) · Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science · doi:10.1016/j.jcbs.2020.07.003 · Cited by 210 · see citing works
Daks, J. S., Peltz, J. S., & Rogge, R. D. (2020) · Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science · doi:10.1016/j.jcbs.2020.08.003 · Cited by 197 · see citing works
Smith, B. M., Twohy, A. J., & Smith, G. S. (2020) · Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science · doi:10.1016/j.jcbs.2020.09.005 · Cited by 194 · cited 3× · see citing works
“, 2006) as an important target in the treatment and recovery of those adversely affected (see Crasta et al., 2020; Daks et al., 2020; Dawson & Golijani-Moghaddam, 2020; Gloster et al., 2017; Kroska et al., 2020; McCracken et al., 2021; Pakenham et al., 2020; Smith et al., 2020).”
BackgroundMethodResultMcCracken, L. M., Badinlou, F., Buhrman, M., & Brocki, K. C. (2021) · Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science · doi:10.1016/j.jcbs.2020.11.003 · Cited by 146 · see citing works
Self-citationRogge, R. D., Daks, J. S., Dubler, B. A., & Saint, K. J. (2019) · Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science · doi:10.1016/j.jcbs.2019.10.001 · Cited by 109 · cited 1× · see citing works
“, 2021) are limited due to the incomplete representation of all facets of the model and the use of PF measures with known limitations (Ong et al., 2020; Rogge et al., 2019).”
BackgroundPsychological flexibility in the context of COVID-19 adversity: Associations with distress
Kroska, E. B., Roche, A. I., Adamowicz, J. L., & Stegall, M. S. (2020) · Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science · doi:10.1016/j.jcbs.2020.07.011 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
Ong, C. W., Pierce, B. G., Petersen, J. M., Barney, J. L., Fruge, J. E., Levin, M. E., & Twohig, M. P. (2020) · Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science · doi:10.1016/j.jcbs.2020.08.007 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Crasta, D., Daks, J. S., & Rogge, R. D. (2020) · Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science · doi:10.1016/j.jcbs.2020.09.003 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Landi, G., Pakenham, K. I., Crocetti, E., Grandi, S., & Tossani, E. (2021) · Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science · doi:10.1016/j.jcbs.2021.05.004 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Italian validation of the Italian multidimensional psychological flexibility inventory (MPFI)
Landi, G., Pakenham, K. I., Giovannetti, A. M., Presti, G., Boccolini, G., Cola, A., Grandi, S., & Tossani, E. (2021) · Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science · doi:10.1016/j.jcbs.2021.05.007 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Yu, L., Kioskli, K., & McCracken, L. (2021) · Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2021.02.011 · Cited by 36 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The argument made from the previous studies is that methods to improve psychological flexibility (or reduce psychological inflexibility) might lead to better clinical and population outcome in those suffering from depression, anxiety, or insomnia in the pandemic context (Crasta et al., 2020; Daks et al., 2020; Dawson…”
MethodSelf-citationPsychometric evaluation of the Swedish Multidimensional Psychological Flexibility Inventory (MPFI)
Tabrizi, F. F., Larsson, A. B., Grönvall, H., Söderstrand, L., Hallén, E., Champoux-Larsson, M.-F., Lundgren, T., Sundström, F., Lavefjord, A., Buhrman, M., et al. (2023) · Cognitive Behaviour Therapy · doi:10.1080/16506073.2022.2153077 · Cited by 18 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The instrument has been translated and validated in Swedish and this version has been found to be a reliable instrument with sufficient support for validity (Tabrizi et al., 2022).”
Self-citationImpact of COVID-19 pandemic on mental health across different populations
MUKHERJEE, K., BANIK, S., & CHAKRABORTY, N. (2021) · Minerva Psychiatry · doi:10.23736/s2724-6612.21.02172-2 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
2 of the 31 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Psychological Flexibility, Chronic Pain, and Health
McCracken, L. M. (2023) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-020223-124335 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Self-citationIdentification of psychological flexibility and inflexibility profiles during the COVID‐19 pandemic
Pakenham, K. I., Landi, G., Cattivelli, R., Grandi, S., & Tossani, E. (2023) · Journal of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1002/jclp.23536 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Psychological inflexibility as a predictor associated with insomnia
El Rafihi‐Ferreira, R., Linares, I. M. P., Paulos‐Guarnieri, L., & Zakiei, A. (2024) · Journal of Sleep Research · doi:10.1111/jsr.14232 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
“…El Rafihi-Ferreira et al., 2022; McCracken et al., 2011; McCracken et al., 2021; McCracken et al., 2022; McCracken et al., 2023; Zakiei et al., 2022), whereas psychological flexibility was found as a predictor of lower levels of insomnia severity (McCracken et al., 2022; McCracken et al., 2023).”
InfluentialArslan, G., Uzun, K., GÜVEN, A. Z., & Gürsu, O. (2024) · Journal of Ethnicity in Substance Abuse · doi:10.1080/15332640.2024.2366981 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
“Psychological flexibility has also been identified as an important factor in improving psychological well-being and reducing symptoms of depression and anxiety (McCracken et al., 2022).”
Zakiei, A., Khazaie, H., Rostampour, M., Moradi, M.-T., Rezaie, L., Komasi, S., & Rafihi-Ferreira, R. E. (2024) · Current Sleep Medicine Reports · doi:10.1007/s40675-024-00293-w · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Mansueto, G., Ruggiero, G. M., & Palmieri, S. (2024) · Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1007/s10942-024-00556-z · Cited by 10 · see citing works
“Greater psychological flexibility may mitigate the negative impacts of fear of COVID-19 on affective symptoms and well-being (Hayes et al., 2006, 2012 ; McCracken et al., 2022 ; Yao et al., 2023 ).”
InfluentialSelinheimo, S., Vuokko, A., Lappalainen, P., Keinonen, K., Sainio, M., Lappalainen, R., & Paunio, T. (2025) · BMC Psychology · doi:10.1186/s40359-025-02549-8 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
“…been recognised for example among adults suffering from somatic symptom and related disorders [21, 22], persistent symptoms associated with COVID-19 [23] or chronic pain [24] for which the recently updated definition includes the influence of psychosocial factors on subjective pain experience [25].”
Carvalho, S. A., Pinto, H., Carreiras, D., Palmeira, L., Pereira, M., & Trindade, I. A. (2024) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1378213 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Ryan, E. C., O'Neill, D., & Smyth, S. (2025) · Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science · doi:10.1016/j.jcbs.2025.100871 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
McCracken, L. M., Buhrman, M., & Brocki, K. (2023) · Scandinavian Journal of Pain · doi:10.1515/sjpain-2022-0138 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Self-citationChung, S., Song, K., & Günlü, A. (2024) · Psychiatry Investigation · doi:10.30773/pi.2023.0326 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“During this pandemic, it was re-ported that psychological flexibility was important to mental health 33 or well-being 34 during lockdown.”
BackgroundDou, X., Cai, E., Liu, Y., Chen, T., Tan, T. C., Gu, Q., & Huang, T. (2025) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-025-23673-5 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“Recent evidence has showed the role of psychological flexibility and psychological inflexibility in depression management [19].”
Qin, F., Zhu, Y., Wang, S., Zhang, L., Wang, Z., & Wan, H. (2025) · Supportive Care in Cancer · doi:10.1007/s00520-024-09126-6 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“They can help patients to effectively adapt to adversity and, in some cases, foster personal growth [12].”
Bin, F. Y., Yunus, N. S. M., Venugopal, V., & Mansor, Z. (2024) · Malaysian Journal of Medicine and Health Sciences · doi:10.47836/mjmhs20.5.26 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Briggs, D., Sease, T. B., Menou, R., & Perkins, D. R. (2026) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs16050686 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“For example, some individuals have focused on how various practices and concepts within the field of psychology may be used to help improve people’s overall life satisfaction and well-being (Bahlinger et al., 2022; McCracken et al., 2022).”
Kıyak, S., & Polat, H. T. (2023) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-2577182/v1
Koppert, T. Y. (2023) · doi:10.33540/1865
Nunes, S. A. N., Silva, M. C., Silva, L. C., & Fernandes, M. G. (2023) · PsicoFAE/Revista PsicoFAE · doi:10.55388/psicofae.v12n2.445
شريف, ن. م., بدوي, م. ح. ا., & عزه, م. س. س. ب. (2024) · Al-Mağallah Al-ʿArabiyyaẗ Lil-Qiyās wa Al-Taqwīm · doi:10.21608/ajme.2024.346248
شريف, ن. م., بدوي, م. ح. ا., & عزه, م. س. س. ب. (2024) · Al-Mağallah Al-ʿArabiyyaẗ Lil-Qiyās wa Al-Taqwīm · doi:10.21608/ajme.2024.346247
Kıyak, S., & Polat, H. T. (2024) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-5427488/v1
Impact of sleep and psychological flexibility on young adults’ physical and mental well-being
Ishii, M., Hakoda, M., & Okajima, I. (2026) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-026-53737-4
Entus, B. J., Assmann, N., Newe, C., Faßbinder, E., Huth, H. A., Borgwardt, S., & Klein, J. P. (2026) · Psychiatrische Praxis · doi:10.1055/a-2768-2149
“In einer Studie zu den Auswirkungen der COVID-19 Pandemie war Defusion der stärkste Prädiktor unter den Prozessen der psychischen Flexibilität für geringere psychische Belastung [26].”
- Authors
- McCracken, L. M., Buhrman, M., Badinlou, F., & Brocki, K. C.
- Affiliations
- Uppsala University (SE)
- Corresponding author
- Brocki, Karin C.
- Venue
- Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-10
- Volume
- 26
- Pages
- 187-192
- ISSN
- 2212-1447 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC9554036
- OpenAlex
- W4304688869
- Semantic Scholar
- be93940d03249e816aa92107c422f2d9160c5539
- Cited by
- 24
- References
- 31
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 6
- FWCI
- 4.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Uppsala University Publications (Uppsala University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
- Keywords
- psychological flexibility, psychological inflexibility, long COVID, depression, anxiety, insomnia, acceptance, COVID-19 pandemic, mental health
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-09-28.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-09-28.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review