Psychometric evaluation of the Swedish Multidimensional Psychological Flexibility Inventory (MPFI)
Open accessAbstract
Psychiatric disorders are common, and reliable measures are crucial for research and clinical practice. A cross-diagnostic construct that can be used to index treatment outcomes as well as prevalence of psychological ill health is psychological flexibility. The aim of this study was to validate a Swedish version of the Multidimensional Psychological Flexibility Inventory (MPFI). The MPFI has 12 subscales, six of which measure flexibility, and six that measure inflexibility. Using confirmatory factor analysis in a community sample of 670 participants, we found that a model with two higher order factors had satisfactory fit (CFI = .933) and a 12-factor model had the best fit to the data (CFI = .955). All 12 subscales showed adequate reliability (CRs = .803-.933) and the factor structure was similar across age groups and gender. Findings suggest that the Swedish version of the MPFI is a reliable instrument that can be used to index psychological flexibility. Potential areas for improvement of the instrument are discussed.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
R Core Team (2000) · doi:10.32614/r.manuals · Cited by 355,706 · see citing works
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
American Psychiatric Association (2013) · doi:10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596 · Cited by 116,369 · see citing works
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999) · Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1080/10705519909540118 · Cited by 108,788 · see citing works
The satisfaction with life scale
Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13 · Cited by 31,768 · see citing works
<b>lavaan</b> : An <i>R</i> Package for Structural Equation Modeling
Rosseel, Y. (2012) · Journal of Statistical Software · doi:10.18637/jss.v048.i02 · Cited by 27,955 · see citing works
(2014) · Climate Change 2013 – The Physical Science Basis · doi:10.1017/cbo9781107415324.004 · Cited by 23,880 · see citing works
Sensitivity of Goodness of Fit Indexes to Lack of Measurement Invariance
Chen, F. F. (2007) · Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1080/10705510701301834 · Cited by 12,217 · see citing works
Gratz, K. L., & Roemer, L. (2004) · Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment · doi:10.1023/b:joba.0000007455.08539.94 · Cited by 8,942 · see citing works
Jacobson, N. S., & Truax, P. (1991) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.59.1.12 · Cited by 7,770 · see citing works
Acceptance and commitment therapy: model, processes and outcomes
Hayes, S. C., Luoma, J. B., Bond, F. W., Masuda, A., & Lillis, J. (2006) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2005.06.006 · Cited by 6,587 · cited 9× · see citing works
“All together, these six processes are said to create the higher-level process of Psychological Flexibility (PF; Hayes et al., 2006).”
BackgroundInfluentialA scaled difference chi-square test statistic for moment structure analysis
Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (2001) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02296192 · Cited by 5,282 · see citing works
Bond, F. W., Hayes, S. C., Baer, R. A., Carpenter, K. M., Guenole, N., Orcutt, H. K., Waltz, T., & Zettle, R. D. (2011) · Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.beth.2011.03.007 · Cited by 3,950 · see citing works
Hayes, S. C., Wilson, K. G., Gifford, E. V., Follette, V. M., & Strosahl, K. (1996) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-006x.64.6.1152 · Cited by 3,595 · see citing works
Psychological flexibility as a fundamental aspect of health
Kashdan, T. B., & Rottenberg, J. (2010) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2010.03.001 · Cited by 3,054 · cited 1× · see citing works
“One promising transdiagnostic approach to psychopathological processes is the Psychological Flexibility model, which has been conceptualized as a key ingredient to mental health (Kashdan & Rottenberg, 2010).”
BackgroundEnsuring Positiveness of the Scaled Difference Chi-square Test Statistic
Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (2009) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/s11336-009-9135-y · Cited by 2,725 · see citing works
The p Factor: One General Psychopathology Factor in the Structure of Psychiatric Disorders?
Caspi, A., Houts, R. M., Belsky, D. W., Goldman-Mellor, S. J., Harrington, H., Israel, S., Meier, M. H., Ramrakha, S., Shalev, I., Poulton, R., et al. (2014) · Clinical Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/2167702613497473 · Cited by 2,449 · see citing works
Measuring experiential avoidance: A preliminary test of a working model
Hayes, S. C., Strosahl, K., Wilson, K. G., Bissett, R. T., Pistorello, J., Toarmino, D., Polusny, M. A., Dykstra, T. A., Batten, S. V., Bergan, J., et al. (2004) · The Psychological Record · doi:10.1007/bf03395492 · Cited by 2,140 · see citing works
Murtagh, F. D., & Heck, A. (1987) · Astrophysics and space science library · doi:10.1007/978-94-009-3789-5 · Cited by 2,072 · see citing works
Acceptance and commitment therapy.
Hayes, S. C., & Lillis, J. (2012) · American Psychological Association eBooks · doi:10.1037/17335-000 · Cited by 1,543 · see citing works
The detection of psychiatric illness by questionnaire
Goldberg, D. P. (1972) · Oxford University Press eBooks · Cited by 1,191 · see citing works
Avenevoli, S. (2012) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.160 · Cited by 1,149 · see citing works
Acceptance of chronic pain: component analysis and a revised assessment method
McCracken, L. M., Vowles, K. E., & Eccleston, C. (2004) · Pain · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2003.10.012 · Cited by 1,101 · see citing works
Self-citationBjureberg, J., Ljótsson, B., Tull, M. T., Hedman, E., Sahlin, H., Lundh, L.-G., Bjärehed, J., DiLillo, D., Messman-Moore, T., Gumpert, C. H., et al. (2016) · Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment · doi:10.1007/s10862-015-9514-x · Cited by 1,081 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Note: ** = p < .01; Acc = Acceptance; PrMoAw = Present Moment Awareness; SelfCtx = Self as Context; CoAc = Committed Action; ExpAv = Experiential Avoidance; LCPM = Lack of Contact with the Present Moment; SelfCon= Self as Content; LCV = Lack Contact with Values; AAQ-II = Acceptance and Action Questionnaire; AFQ-Y8 = A…”
BackgroundA-Tjak, J. G. L., Davis, M. L., Morina, N., Powers, M. B., Smits, J. A. J., & Emmelkamp, P. M. G. (2015) · Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics · doi:10.1159/000365764 · Cited by 921 · see citing works
Transdiagnostic approaches to mental health problems: Current status and future directions.
Dalgleish, T., Black, M., Johnston, D., & Bevan, A. (2020) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/ccp0000482 · Cited by 883 · see citing works
Clark, L. A., Cuthbert, B., Lewis-Fernández, R., Narrow, W. E., & Reed, G. M. (2017) · Psychological Science in the Public Interest · doi:10.1177/1529100617727266 · Cited by 688 · see citing works
Greco, L. A., Lambert, W., & Baer, R. A. (2008) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/1040-3590.20.2.93 · Cited by 514 · see citing works
Rolffs, J. L., Rogge, R. D., & Wilson, K. G. (2018) · Assessment · doi:10.1177/1073191116645905 · Cited by 504 · see citing works
Francis, A. W., Dawson, D. L., & Golijani-Moghaddam, N. (2016) · Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science · doi:10.1016/j.jcbs.2016.05.003 · Cited by 496 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…(Greco et al., 2008), Valued Living Questionnaire (e.g. Wilson & DuFrene, 2009), and the more general Comprehensive assessment of ACT processes (Francis et al., 2016), the single most comprehensive measure to date is the 60-item Multidimensional Psychological Flexibility Inventory (MPFI;…”
BackgroundDefining the Minimum Level of Detectable Change for the Roland-Morris Questionnaire
Stratford, P. W., Binkley, J. M., Solomon, P. E., Finch, E., Gill, C., & Moreland, J. D. (1996) · Physical Therapy · doi:10.1093/ptj/76.4.359 · Cited by 459 · see citing works
The brief experiential avoidance questionnaire: Development and initial validation
Gámez, W., Chmielewski, M., Kotov, R., Ruggero, C., Suzuki, N., & Watson, D. (2014) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/a0034473 · Cited by 450 · see citing works
A Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology Can Transform Mental Health Research
Conway, C. C., Forbes, M. K., Forbush, K. T., Fried, E. I., Hallquist, M. N., Kotov, R., Mullins-Sweatt, S. N., Shackman, A. J., Skodol, A. E., South, S. C., et al. (2019) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691618810696 · Cited by 426 · see citing works
Examining psychological inflexibility as a transdiagnostic process across psychological disorders
Levin, M. E., MacLane, C., Daflos, S., Seeley, J. R., Hayes, S. C., Biglan, A., & Pistorello, J. (2014) · Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science · doi:10.1016/j.jcbs.2014.06.003 · Cited by 400 · see citing works
Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment
(2013) · Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment · doi:10.1007/10862.1573-3505 · Cited by 376 · see citing works
Tyndall, I., Waldeck, D., Pancani, L., Whelan, R., Roche, B., & Dawson, D. L. (2019) · Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science · doi:10.1016/j.jcbs.2018.09.005 · Cited by 303 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…Avoidance Questionnaire (Gaméz et al., 2014), Avoidance and Fusion Questionnaire for Youth (Greco et al., 2008), Valued Living Questionnaire (e.g. Wilson & DuFrene, 2009), and the more general Comprehensive assessment of ACT processes (Francis et al., 2016), the single most comprehensive measure…”
BackgroundFarahani, N. S. (2019) · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · doi:10.22070/cpap.2020.2902 · Cited by 280 · see citing works
Clashing diagnostic approaches: DSM-ICD versus RDoC
Lilienfeld, S. O., & Treadway, M. T. (2016) · Annual Review of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-021815-093122 · Cited by 275 · see citing works
Comorbid mental disorders: Implications for treatment and sample selection.
Newman, D. L., Moffitt, T. E., Caspi, A., & Silva, P. A. (1998) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-843x.107.2.305 · Cited by 267 · see citing works
(2009) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 249 · see citing works
Doherty, J. L., & Owen, M. J. (2014) · Genome Medicine · doi:10.1186/gm546 · Cited by 228 · see citing works
Hayes, S. C., Hofmann, S. G., & Ciarrochi, J. (2020) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2020.101908 · Cited by 227 · see citing works
Further evaluation of the psychometric properties of the acceptance and action questionnaire-II
Fledderus, M., Oude Voshaar, M. A. H., ten Klooster, P. M., & Bohlmeijer, E. T. (2012) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/a0028200 · Cited by 195 · cited 2× · see citing works
“However, although initial evaluations of the AAQ showed that it has sound psychometric properties (Bond et al., 2011; Fledderus et al., 2012), recent investigations have raised concerns with respect to item functioning and discriminant validity (Ong et al.”
BackgroundLundin, A., Hallgren, M. Å., Theobald, H., Hellgren, C., & Torgén, M. (2016) · Public Health · doi:10.1016/j.puhe.2016.03.005 · Cited by 175 · see citing works
Does the 12-item General Health Questionnaire contain multiple factors and do we need them?
Gao, F., Luo, N., Thumboo, J., Fones, C. S. L., Li, S., & Cheung, Y. (2004) · Health and Quality of Life Outcomes · doi:10.1186/1477-7525-2-63 · Cited by 169 · see citing works
Twohig, M. P., Abramowitz, J. S., Smith, B. M., Fabricant, L. E., Jacoby, R. J., Morrison, K. L., Bluett, E. J., Reuman, L., Blakey, S. M., & Ledermann, T. (2018) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2018.06.005 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
Hultell, D., & Petter Gustavsson, J. (2008) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2007.10.030 · Cited by 153 · see citing works
Lang, P. J., McTeague, L. M., & Bradley, M. M. (2016) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/psyp.12462 · Cited by 138 · see citing works
Personal values and pain tolerance: Does a values intervention add to acceptance?
Branstetter-Rost, A., Cushing, C., & Douleh, T. (2009) · The Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2009.01.001 · Cited by 135 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Thus, the AAQ has served as a useful self-assessment tool in laboratory experiments, clinical trials and crosssectional surveys (Branstetter-Rost et al., 2009; Levin et al., 2013; Twohig et al., 2018).”
MethodSubstance abuse and psychological flexibility: the development of a new measure
Luoma, J., Drake, C. E., Kohlenberg, B. S., & Hayes, S. C. (2011) · Addiction Research & Theory · doi:10.3109/16066359.2010.524956 · Cited by 131 · see citing works
The Model-Size Effect on Traditional and Modified Tests of Covariance Structures
Herzog, W., Boomsma, A., & Reinecke, S. (2007) · Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1080/10705510701301602 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Pacheco, J. L., Garvey, M. A., Sarampote, C. S., Cohen, E. D., Murphy, E. R., & Friedman‐Hill, S. R. (2022) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/jcpp.13543 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Ong, C. W., Pierce, B. G., Petersen, J. M., Barney, J. L., Fruge, J. E., Levin, M. E., & Twohig, M. P. (2020) · Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science · doi:10.1016/j.jcbs.2020.08.007 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Grégoire, S., Gagnon, J., Lachance, L., Shankland, R., Dionne, F., Kotsou, I., Monestès, J.-L., Rolffs, J. L., & Rogge, R. D. (2020) · Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science · doi:10.1016/j.jcbs.2020.06.004 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
A Note on Sample Size and Solution Propriety for Confirmatory Factor Analytic Models
Jackson, D. L., Voth, J., & Frey, M. P. (2013) · Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1080/10705511.2013.742388 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
La thérapie d’acceptation et d’engagement
Ducasse, D., & Fond, G. (2015) · L Encéphale · doi:10.1016/j.encep.2013.04.017 · Cited by 71 · cited 1× · see citing works
“ACT (said as a word; Hayes et al., 2012) is an evidence-based behavioural therapy model that has widespread application for a wide range of mental health (A-Tjak et al., 2015; Ducasse & Fond, 2015) and behaviour change challenges (for a book-length review, see Hooper & Larsson, 2015).”
BackgroundThe Research Journey of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT)
Hooper, N., & Larsson, A. (2015) · doi:10.1057/9781137440174 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Self-citationMeasuring experiential avoidance in adults: the Avoidance and Fusion Questionnaire
Schmalz, J. E., & Murrell, A. R. (2010) · International Journal of Behavioral Consultation and Therapy · doi:10.1037/h0100908 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Lin, Y.-Y., Rogge, R. D., & Swanson, D. P. (2020) · Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science · doi:10.1016/j.jcbs.2019.11.008 · Cited by 58 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…Japanese, Italian, and French, where confirmatory factor analyses of the 60-item version and a brief 24-item version (available in English and French) have shown acceptable to excellent support for a two-factor second order model (Grégoire et al., 2020; Landi et al., 2021; Lin et al., 2020).”
BackgroundMethodMacKenzie, M. B., & Kocovski, N. L. (2010) · International Journal of Behavioral Consultation and Therapy · doi:10.1037/h0100909 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Livheim, F., Tengström, A., Bond, F. W., Andersson, G., Dahl, J., & Rosendahl, I. (2016) · Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science · doi:10.1016/j.jcbs.2016.04.001 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Toward a Clinically‐Oriented Model of Anxiety Disorders
Norton, P. J. (2006) · Cognitive Behaviour Therapy · doi:10.1080/16506070500441561 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Swedish Acceptance and Action Questionnaire (SAAQ): a psychometric evaluation
Lundgren, T., & Parling, T. (2017) · Cognitive Behaviour Therapy · doi:10.1080/16506073.2016.1250228 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Self-citationItalian validation of the Italian multidimensional psychological flexibility inventory (MPFI)
Landi, G., Pakenham, K. I., Giovannetti, A. M., Presti, G., Boccolini, G., Cola, A., Grandi, S., & Tossani, E. (2021) · Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science · doi:10.1016/j.jcbs.2021.05.007 · Cited by 39 · cited 9× · see citing works
“The MPFI has been translated into several languages including Mandarin, Japanese, Italian, and French, where confirmatory factor analyses of the 60-item version and a brief 24-item version (available in English and French) have shown acceptable to excellent support for a two-factor second order model (Grégoire et al.,…”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialAn Examination of the Factor Structure of the Multidimensional Psychological Flexibility Inventory.
Thomas, K. N., Bardeen, J. R., Witte, T. K., Rogers, T. A., Benfer, N., & Clauss, K. (2022) · Assessment · doi:10.1177/10731911211024353 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Measuring avoidance of pain: validation of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire II-pain version
Reneman, M. F., Kleen, M., Trompetter, H. R., Schiphorst Preuper, H. R., Köke, A., van Baalen, B., & Schreurs, K. M. G. (2014) · International Journal of Rehabilitation Research · doi:10.1097/mrr.0000000000000044 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Mätning av psykiskt välbefinnande bland ungdomar i Sverige
Sconfienza, C. (1998) · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (2010). Ensuring positiveness of the scaled difference Chi-square test statistic. Psychometrika , 75 (2), 243-248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-009-9135-y · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Sundström, F. T., Lavefjord, A., Buhrman, M., & McCracken, L. M. (2023) · The Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2022.11.010 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Self-citationMcCracken, L. M., Buhrman, M., Badinlou, F., & Brocki, K. C. (2022) · Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science · doi:10.1016/j.jcbs.2022.10.003 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
“The instrument has been translated and validated in Swedish and this version has been found to be a reliable instrument with sufficient support for validity (Tabrizi et al., 2022).”
Self-citationHekmati, I., Abdollahpour Ranjbar, H., Ciarrochi, J., Laghaei, M., Rezaei Golezani, H., & Eskin, M. (2024) · Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science · doi:10.1016/j.jcbs.2023.100717 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Associations between psychological flexibility and daily functioning in endometriosis-related pain
Sundström, F., Lavefjord, A., Buhrman, M., & McCracken, L. M. (2023) · Scandinavian Journal of Pain · doi:10.1515/sjpain-2022-0157 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Self-citationBarrado‐Moreno, V., Esteve, R., López-Martínez, A. E., & Ramírez‐Maestre, C. (2025) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-025-07421-x · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Cyniak‐Cieciura, M., Dudek, J. E., & Ostaszewski, P. (2024) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0304661 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Moosivand, M., Kulemarzi, M. J. B., Shirazi, M. S., & Zaremohzzabieh, Z. (2024) · BMC Psychology · doi:10.1186/s40359-024-01531-0 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Multidimensional Psychological Flexibility Inventory (MPFI)
Rogge, R. D., & Lin, Y. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-77644-2_114-1 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Multidimensional Psychological Flexibility Inventory (MPFI)
Rogge, R. D., & Lin, Y. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-47219-0_114 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Lavefjord, A., Sundström, F., Hammar, A., Preihs, L., van de Leur, J. C., Forslund, S., Scholten, S., Magnusson, K., Klintwall, L., Buhrman, M., et al. (2026) · Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science · doi:10.1016/j.jcbs.2026.100997 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Self-citationComprehensive and Efficient Assessment of Psychological Flexibility in the Context of Chronic Pain
Lavefjord, A., Sundström, F., Chia, D., Tabrizi, F. F., Buhrman, M., & McCracken, L. M. (2025) · European Journal of Pain · doi:10.1002/ejp.4781 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Self-citationRomanian Adaptation and Validation of the Multidimensional Psychological Flexibility Inventory
Marian, Ș., Crișan, I., Varga, Ș. S., & Isbășoiu, A. B. (2026) · Evaluation & the Health Professions · doi:10.1177/01632787261430842 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Validation of the Italian Multidimensional Psychological Flexibility Inventory Short Form (MPFI-24)
Landi, G., Bao, Z., Bruno, F., Pakenham, K. I., Chiesi, F., Tossani, E., & Grandi, S. (2026) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs16040510 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Ribeyron, J., Grégoire, S., Leys, C., Vigouroux, S. L., & Shankland, R. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.6336279
Jo, D., Im, S., Lee, E., & Yang, E. (2026) · Cognitive Behaviour Therapy · doi:10.1080/16506073.2026.2680603
Hovén, E., Frick, A., Skalkidou, A., Papadopoulos, F. C., Ekselius, L., Gingnell, M., Karlsson, R.-M., Brocki, K. C., Ljungvall, H., Lindqvist, E. A., et al. (2026) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2026-120432
Jo, D., Im, S., Spencer, S. D., & Masuda, A. (2026) · Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment · doi:10.1007/s10862-026-10314-3
A network psychometric evaluation of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire – III and PsyFlex
Ruiz, F. J., Bastidas-Suárez, D. M., & Vargas, C. A. (2026) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0359352
- Authors
- Tabrizi, F. F., Larsson, A. B., Grönvall, H., Söderstrand, L., Hallén, E., Champoux-Larsson, M.-F., Lundgren, T., Sundström, F., Lavefjord, A., Buhrman, M., Sundin, Ö., McCracken, L., Åhs, F., & Jansson, B.
- Affiliations
- Mid Sweden University (SE)
- Department of Psychology & Social Work, Mittuniversitetet, Östersund, Sweden
- Karolinska Institutet (SE)
- Uppsala University (SE)
- Corresponding author
- Tabrizi, Fara F.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Cognitive Behaviour Therapy
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2022-12-23
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 295-316
- ISSN
- 1650-6073 (ISSN-L)
- 1651-2316
- OpenAlex
- W4312114736
- Cited by
- 18
- References
- 67
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2
- FWCI
- 2.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Cognitive Behaviour Therapy (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Uppsala University Publications (Uppsala University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
- PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Keywords
- psychological flexibility, inflexibility, psychometric validation, Swedish adaptation, factor structure, reliability statistics, higher-order factors, age and gender differences
- MeSH terms
- Mental Disorders, Humans, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sweden, Reproducibility of Results
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
