Cited by 39Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis ApplicationsMass Spectrometry Techniques and ApplicationsAdvanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications

High speed capillary zone electrophoresis–mass spectrometry via an electrokinetically pumped sheath flow interface for rapid analysis of amino acids and a protein digest

Open access
Schiavone, Nicole M., Sarver, Scott A., Sun, Liangliang, Wojcik, Roza, Dovichi, Norman J.·2015·Journal of Chromatography B

Abstract

While capillary zone electrophoresis (CZE) has been used to produce very rapid and efficient separations, coupling these high-speed separations with mass spectrometry (MS) has been challenging. Now, with much faster and sensitive mass spectrometers, it is possible to take full advantage of the CZE speed and reconstruct the fast migrating peaks. Here are three high-speed CZE-MS analyses via an electrokinetically pumped sheath-flow interface. The first separation demonstrates CZE-ESI-MS of an amino acid mixture with a 2-min separation, >50,000 theoretical plates, low micromolar concentration detection limits, and subfemtomole mass detection limits (LTQ XL mass spectrometer). The second separation with our recently improved third-generation CE-MS interface illustrates a 20 amino acid separation in ∼7min with an average over 200,000 plate counts, and results in almost-baseline resolution of structural isomers, leucine and isoleucine. The third separation is of a BSA digest with a reproducible CZE separation and mass spectrometry detection in 2min. CZE-MS/MS analysis of the BSA digest identified 31 peptides, produced 52% sequence coverage, and generated a peak capacity of ∼40 across the 1-min separation window (Q-Exactive mass spectrometer).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jchromb.2015.04.001

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schiavone, N. M., Sarver, S. A., Sun, L., Wojcik, R., & Dovichi, N. J.
Affiliations
University of Notre Dame (US)
Venue
Journal of Chromatography B
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-06
Volume
991
Pages
53-58
ISSN
1570-0232 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1974546464
Cited by
39
References
28
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4 · 2013: 1
FWCI
3.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Chromatography B (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (R01GM096767)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
Keywords
capillary zone electrophoresis, amino acid separation, protein digests, bovine serum albumin, peptide identification, high-speed separation, peak capacity
MeSH terms
Amino Acids, Animals, Cattle, Serum Albumin, Bovine, Time Factors, Electrophoresis, Capillary, Spectrometry, Mass, Electrospray Ionization, Tandem Mass Spectrometry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review