Cited by 43Mass Spectrometry Techniques and ApplicationsAdvanced Proteomics Techniques and ApplicationsMicrofluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications

Capillary electrophoresis with Orbitrap-Velos mass spectrometry detection

Open access
Wojcik, Roza, Li, Yihan, MacCoss, Michael J., Dovichi, Norman J.·2012·Talanta

Abstract

Capillary electrophoresis can provide fast and efficient separations of peptides. However, the high speed separation and limited loading capacity of capillary electrophoresis requires the use of a fast and sensitive detector. While laser-induced fluorescence provides exquisite sensitivity and millisecond response time, it inherently generates a low information content signal. In contrast, mass spectrometry provides an information rich signal that is attractive for peptide analysis. The recently introduced Velos-Orbitrap mass spectrometer is capable of fast and sensitive tandem MS acquisition and simultaneous high accuracy MS acquisition, which is well suited for coupling with fast and efficient separation methods for peptide analysis. We evaluated this instrument as a detector for peptide separation by capillary electrophoresis. In MS mode, we observed low attomole detection limits for a number of peptides in a tryptic digest of standard proteins with high mass resolution (30,000 at m/z 400). The response time of the Orbitrap at this resolution was ∼0.70s, which was adequate to reconstruct the peak shape and area of our electrophoretic peaks. The linear ion-trap successfully recorded tandem MS spectra of tryptic peptides at 20 nM concentration.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.talanta.2011.10.048

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 39 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wojcik, R., Li, Y., MacCoss, M. J., & Dovichi, N. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Notre Dame (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
Venue
Talanta
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-01
Volume
88
Pages
324-329
ISSN
0039-9140 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2029739770
Cited by
43
References
39
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 6
FWCI
3.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Talanta (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (R01GM096767)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications
Keywords
capillary electrophoresis, mass spectrometry detection, peptide separation, tandem mass spectrometry, linear ion trap, tryptic peptides, detection limit, mass resolution, response time (sensor)
MeSH terms
Molecular Weight, Peptides, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Sensitivity and Specificity, Time Factors, Electrophoresis, Capillary, Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins, Tandem Mass Spectrometry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review