Cited by 103Advanced Proteomics Techniques and ApplicationsMass Spectrometry Techniques and ApplicationsMicrofluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications

Single-Shot Proteomics Using Capillary Zone Electrophoresis–Electrospray Ionization-Tandem Mass Spectrometry with Production of More than 1 250 Escherichia coli Peptide Identifications in a 50 min Separation

Open access
Zhu, Guijie, Sun, Liangliang, Yan, Xiaojing, Dovichi, Norman J.·2013·Analytical Chemistry

Abstract

Capillary zone electrophoresis (CZE)-electrospray ionization-tandem mass spectrometry (ESI-MS/MS) was optimized and applied for analysis of 1-100 ng Escherichia coli protein digests in a single run (single-shot analysis). The system employed an electrokinetically pumped nanospray interface, a coated capillary, and stacking conditions for sample injection. More than 1 250 peptides were identified by optimized single-shot CZE-ESI-MS/MS with 100 ng digest loaded and 50 min analysis time. When 10 ng and 1 ng digests were loaded, about 1 000 and 600 peptides were identified in a single-shot analysis, respectively. Compared with single-shot ultraperformance liquid chromatography (UPLC)-ESI-MS/MS, CZE-ESI-MS/MS produced fewer peptide IDs (1 377 ± 128 vs 1 875 ± 32) for large sample loading amounts (100 ng) with the same mass spectrometer time (50 min). However, when the loaded digest was mass limited (1 ng), CZE-ESI-MS/MS generated many more peptide identifications than UPLC-ESI-MS/MS (627 ± 38 vs 342 ± 113). In addition, CZE-ESI-MS/MS and UPLC-ESI -MS/MS provided complementary peptide level identifications. These results suggest that CZE-ESI-MS/MS may be useful for large-scale, comprehensive, and confident proteomics analysis.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ac303750g

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhu, G., Sun, L., Yan, X., & Dovichi, N. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Notre Dame (US)
  • Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana 46556, United States
Venue
Analytical Chemistry
Published
2013-02-13
Volume
85
Issue
5
Pages
2569-2573
ISSN
  • 0003-2700 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6882
OpenAlex
W1982607050
Cited by
103
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 1
FWCI
7.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Analytical Chemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM096767)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications
Keywords
capillary zone electrophoresis, electrospray ionization, tandem mass spectrometry, Escherichia coli, peptide identification, coated capillaries, sample stacking, protein digests
MeSH terms
Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid, Peptide Fragments, Time Factors, Electrophoresis, Capillary, Spectrometry, Mass, Electrospray Ionization, Escherichia coli Proteins, Proteomics, Tandem Mass Spectrometry, Proteolysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review