The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sustainable business model experimentation by understanding ecologies of business models
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The transition to CE implies a sustainable business model innovation, which 'is about creating superior customer and firm value through addressing societal and environmental needs ' (Bocken et al., 2019, p. 1498).”
From Effective stakeholder governance in circular economy: Insights from Italian companies (2024) · cites this paper as Bocken et al., 2019
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Eight types of product–service system: Eight ways to sustainability? Experiences from SusProNet
Tukker, A. (2004) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.414 · Cited by 2,456
Lindahl, M., Sundin, E., & Sakao, T. (2014) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.07.047 · Cited by 261
Research works printed but not linked: 49
- Antikainen, 2016, A framework for sustainable circular business model innovation, Technol. Innov. Manage. Rev., 6, 5, 10.22215/timreview/1000 · DOI
- Baldassarre, 2017, Bridging sustainable business model innovation and user-driven innovation: a process for sustainable value proposition design, J. Clean. Prod., 147, 175, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.081 · DOI
- Belk, 2014, You are what you can access: sharing and collaborative consumption online, J. Bus. Res., 67, 1595, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.10.001 · DOI · Paper page
- Bhamra, 2011, Design for sustainable behaviour: using products to change consumer behaviour, Des. J., 14, 427
- Bocken, 2018, Pay-per-use business models as a driver for sustainable consumption: evidence from the case of HOMIE, J. Clean. Prod., 198, 498, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.043 · DOI
- Bocken, 2016, Product design and business model strategies for a circular economy, J. Ind. Prod. Engineering., 33, 308
- Bocken, 2018, Experimenting with a circular business model: lessons from eight cases, Environmental innovation and societal transitions, 28, 79, 10.1016/j.eist.2018.02.001 · DOI · Paper page
- Bocken, 2017, Business model experimentation for circularity: "Sustainability in a large international clothing retailer”, Econ. Pol. Energy Environ., 1–2, 85, 10.3280/EFE2017-001006 · DOI
- Bocken, 2016, Towards a sufficiency-driven business model: experiences and opportunities, Env. Innov. Societ. Transit., 18, 41, 10.1016/j.eist.2015.07.010 · DOI
- Bocken, 2013, A value mapping tool for sustainable business modelling, Corp. Govern., 13, 482, 10.1108/CG-06-2013-0078 · DOI
- Boons, 2002, Greening products: a framework for product chain management, J. Clean. Prod., 10, 10.1016/S0959-6526(02)00017-3 · DOI
- Boons, 2013, Organizing within dynamic ecosystems: conceptualizing socio-ecological mechanisms, Organ. Environ., 26, 281, 10.1177/1086026613498755 · DOI
- Boons, 2018, Towards a sharing economy – innovating ecologies of business models, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, 10.1016/j.techfore.2018.06.031 · DOI
- Boons, 2013, Business models for sustainable innovation. State-of-the-art and steps towards a research agenda, J. Clean. Prod., 45, 9, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.07.007 · DOI · Paper page
- Chesbrough, 2010, Business model innovation: opportunities and barriers, Long Range Plan., 43, 354, 10.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.010 · DOI · Paper page
- Chitnis, 2013, Turning lights into flights: estimating direct and indirect rebound effects for UK households, Energy Pol., 55, 234, 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.12.008 · DOI
- Eisenhardt, 2007, Theory building from cases: opportunities and challenges, Acad. Manag. J., 50, 25, 10.5465/amj.2007.24160888 · DOI · Paper page
- Eisenhardt, 2000, Dynamic capabilities: what are they?, Strat. Manag. J., 1105, 10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11<1105::AID-SMJ133>3.0.CO;2-E · DOI
- Foss, 2017, Fifteen years of research on business model innovation: how far have we come, and where should we go?, J. Manag., 43, 200
- Gillingham, 2013, Energy policy: the rebound effect is overplayed, Nature, 493, 475, 10.1038/493475a · DOI
- Hall, 2011, The triple bottom line: what is it and how does it work?, Indiana Bus. Rev., 86, 4
- Hertwich, 2005, Consumption and the rebound effect: an industrial ecology perspective, J. Ind. Ecol., 9, 85, 10.1162/1088198054084635 · DOI
- Hildén, 2017, Special issue on experimentation for climate change solutions editorial: the search for climate change and sustainability solutions-The promise and the pitfalls of experimentation, J. Clean. Prod., 169, 1, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.019 · DOI
- Iaione, 2016, The CO-city: sharing, collaborating, cooperating, and commoning in the city, Am. J. Econ. Sociol., 75, 415, 10.1111/ajes.12145 · DOI
- Joyce, 2016, The triple layered business model canvas: a tool to design more sustainable business models, J. Clean. Prod., 135, 1474, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.067 · DOI
- Kemp, 2007, Transition management as a model for managing processes of co-evolution towards sustainable development, Int. J. Sustain. Dev. World Ecol., 14, 78, 10.1080/13504500709469709 · DOI · Paper page
- Keskin, 2013, Innovation process of new ventures driven by sustainability, J. Clean. Prod., 45, 50, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.05.012 · DOI
- Lüdeke-Freund, 2017, Sustainable business model research and practice: emerging field or passing fancy?, J. Clean. Prod., 168, 1668, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.093 · DOI · Paper page
- Manninen, 2018, Do circular economy business models capture intended environmental value propositions?, J. Clean. Prod., 171, 413, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.003 · DOI · Paper page
- Mont, 2002, Clarifying the concept of product-service system, J. Clean. Prod., 10, 237, 10.1016/S0959-6526(01)00039-7 · DOI · Paper page
- Mont, 2006, Product Service Systems: reviewing achievements and refining the research agenda, J. Clean. Prod., 14, 1451, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.01.017 · DOI
- Porter, 2011, Creating shared value, Harv. Bus. Rev., 89, 62
- Richardson, 2008, The business model: an integrative framework for strategy execution, Strat. Change, 17, 133, 10.1002/jsc.821 · DOI
- Ritala, 2018, Sustainable business model adoption among S&P 500 firms: a longitudinal content analysis study, J. Clean. Prod., 170, 216, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.159 · DOI
- Ritter, 2018, The wider implications of business-model research, Long Range Plann., 51, 1, 10.1016/j.lrp.2017.07.005 · DOI
- Roome, 2016, Journeying toward business models for sustainability: a conceptual model found inside the black box of organisational transformation, Organ. Environ., 29, 11, 10.1177/1086026615595084 · DOI
- Sarasini, 2018, Integrating a business model perspective into transition theory: the example of new mobility services, Env. Innov. Societ. Transit., 27, 16, 10.1016/j.eist.2017.09.004 · DOI
- Schaltegger, 2016, Business models for sustainability. A Co-evolutionary analysis of sustainable entrepreneurship, innovation and transformation, Organ. Environ., 12, 1
- Schot, 2008, Strategic niche management and sustainable innovation journeys: theory, findings, research agenda, and policy, Technol. Anal. Strat. Manag., 20, 537, 10.1080/09537320802292651 · DOI
- Stubbs, 2008, Conceptualizing a “sustainability business model”, Organ. Environ., 21, 103, 10.1177/1086026608318042 · DOI
- Thomas, 2011, A typology for the case study in social science following a review of definition, discourse, and structure, Qual. Inq., 17, 511, 10.1177/1077800411409884 · DOI
- Tukker, 2015, Product services for a resource-efficient and circular economy– a review, J. Clean. Prod., 97, 76, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.11.049 · DOI · Paper page
- Ulrich, 2003, Beyond methodology choice: critical systems thinking as critically systemic discourse, J. Oper. Res. Soc., 54, 325, 10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601518 · DOI
- Upward, 2016, An ontology for strongly sustainable business models: defining an enterprise framework compatible with natural and social science, Organ. Environ., 2 9, 97, 10.1177/1086026615592933 · DOI
- Verboven, 2016, The sustainability paradox of the sharing economy, UWF Umw. Wirtsch. Forum, 24, 303
- Weissbrod, 2017, Developing sustainable business experimentation capability–A case study, J. Clean. Prod., 142, 2663, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.009 · DOI
- Wells, 2018, Degrowth and techno-business model innovation: the case of Riversimple, J. Clean. Prod., 197, 1704, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.186 · DOI
- Wieland, 2017, Business models as service strategy, J. Acad. Market. Sci., 45, 925, 10.1007/s11747-017-0531-z · DOI
- Zott, 2011, The business model: recent developments and future research, J. Manag., 37, 1019
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Boldrini, J.-C., & Antheaume, N. (2021) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127209 · Cited by 69
Effective stakeholder governance in circular economy: Insights from Italian companies
Minoja, M., & Romano, G. (2024) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.143584 · Cited by 35
Metadata
- Authors
- Bocken, N., Boons, F., & Baldassarre, B.
- Venue
- Journal of Cleaner Production
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-01
- Volume
- 208
- Pages
- 1498-1512
- ISSN
- 0959-6526
- Cited by
- 315
- References
- 2
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review