CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 63

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Understanding the EU's circular economy policies through futures of circularity

Pinyol Alberich, Josep, Pansera, Mario, Hartley, Sarah·2023·Journal of Cleaner Production
DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135723
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135723

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Image 1
CC-BY · From the PDF
Fig. 1 Four futures of circularity (Bauwens et al., 2020).
Fig. 1 Four futures of circularity (Bauwens et al., 2020).CC-BY · From the PDF

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 40

  1. Alexander, 2018, Degrowth, energy descent, and ‘low-tech’living: potential pathways for increased resilience in times of crisis, J. Clean. Prod., 197, 1840, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.100 · DOI
  2. Alvarado, 2020, Emerging circular economies: discourse coalitions in a Norwegian case, Sustain. Prod. Consum., 26, 360, 10.1016/j.spc.2020.10.011 · DOI
  3. Bassi, 2019, The use of circular economy practices in SMEs across the EU, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 146, 523, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.03.019 · DOI
  4. Bauwens, 2020, Circular futures: what will they look like?, Ecol. Econ., 175, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106703 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Belmonte-Ureña, 2021, Circular economy, degrowth and green growth as pathways for research on sustainable development goals: a global analysis and future agenda, Ecol. Econ., 185, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107050 · DOI
  6. Bimpizas-Pinis, 2021, Is efficiency enough for circular economy?, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 167, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105399 · DOI
  7. Clube, 2020, The Circular Economy and human needs satisfaction: promising the radical, delivering the familiar, Ecol. Econ., 177, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106772 · DOI
  8. Colombo, 2019, The discourse of eco-innovation in the European union: an analysis of the eco-innovation action plan and Horizon 2020, J. Clean. Prod., 214, 653, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.150 · DOI
  9. Corvellec, 2021, Critiques of the circular economy, J. Ind. Ecol., 26, 421, 10.1111/jiec.13187 · DOI
  10. Czarnitzki, 2012, Productivity effects of basic research in low-tech and high-tech industries, Res. Pol., 41, 1555, 10.1016/j.respol.2012.04.009 · DOI
  11. De Jesus, 2018, Lost in transition? Drivers and barriers in the eco-innovation road to the circular economy, Ecol. Econ., 145, 75, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.08.001 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Fauré, 2019, Four low-carbon futures for a Swedish society beyond GDP growth, J. Clean. Prod., 236, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.07.070 · DOI
  13. Fitch-Roy, 2020, Going around in circles? Conceptual recycling, patching and policy layering in the EU circular economy package, Environ. Polit., 29, 983, 10.1080/09644016.2019.1673996 · DOI
  14. Fitch-Roy, 2021, All around the world: assessing optimality in comparative circular economy policy packages, J. Clean. Prod., 286, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125493 · DOI
  15. Flyvbjerg, 2006, Five misunderstandings about case-study research, Qual. Inq., 12, 219, 10.1177/1077800405284363 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Frenken, 2017, Political economies and environmental futures for the sharing economy, Phil. Trans. Math. Phys. Eng. Sci., 375
  17. Friant, 2020, A typology of circular economy discourses: navigating the diverse visions of a contested paradigm, Resour. Conserv.Recycl., 161, 104917, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104917 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Friant, 2021, Analysing European Union circular economy policies: words versus actions, Sustain. Prod. Consum., 27, 337, 10.1016/j.spc.2020.11.001 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Garrido-Prada, 2021, Driving the circular economy through public environmental and energy R&D: evidence from SMEs in the European Union, Ecol. Econ., 182, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106884 · DOI
  20. Genovese, 2020, The circular economy at a crossroads: technocratic eco-modernism or convivial technology for social revolution?, Appl. Econ. Lett., 1
  21. Genovese, 2021, The circular economy at a crossroads: technocratic eco-modernism or convivial technology for social revolution?, Appl. Econ. Lett., 32, 95
  22. Hartley, 2020, Policies for transitioning towards a circular economy: expectations from the European Union (EU), Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 155, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104634 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Hickel, 2020, Is green growth possible?, New Polit. Econ., 25, 469, 10.1080/13563467.2019.1598964 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Khan, 2021, Strategies for greening the economy in three Nordic countries, Environ. Pol. Govern., 31, 592, 10.1002/eet.1967 · DOI
  25. Kirchherr, 2018, Barriers to the circular economy: evidence from the European Union (EU), Ecol. Econ., 150, 264, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.04.028 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Lazarevic, 2017, Narrating expectations for the circular economy: towards a common and contested European transition, Energy Res. Social Sci., 31, 60, 10.1016/j.erss.2017.05.006 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Leipold, 2021, Transforming ecological modernization ‘from within’or perpetuating it? The circular economy as EU environmental policy narrative, Environ. Polit., 1
  28. Lowe, 2022, What theories of value (could) underpin our circular futures?, Ecol. Econ., 195, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2022.107382 · DOI
  29. Martínez-Alier, 2021, The circularity gap and the growth of world movements for environmental justice, Acad. Lett., 2
  30. McDowall, 2017, Circular economy policies in China and Europe, J. Ind. Ecol., 21, 651, 10.1111/jiec.12597 · DOI
  31. Murray, 2017, The circular economy: an interdisciplinary exploration of the concept and application in a global context, J. Bus. Ethics, 140, 369, 10.1007/s10551-015-2693-2 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Murray, 2017, The circular economy: an interdisciplinary exploration of the concept and application in a global context, J. Bus. Ethics, 140, 369, 10.1007/s10551-015-2693-2 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Pinyol Alberich, 2022, Motivations of European union members states to adopt circular economy strategies: towards a critical geopolitical approach, J. Innov. Econ. Manag., 10.3917/jie.pr1.0125 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Rivas, 2022, Technological Forecasting & Social Change Socio-technical imaginaries of a circular economy in governmental discourse and among science , technology , and innovation actors : a Norwegian case study, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, 183
  35. Stirling, 2008, “Opening up” and “closing down” power, participation, and pluralism in the social appraisal of technology, Sci. Technol. Hum. Val., 33, 262, 10.1177/0162243907311265 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Suárez-Eiroa, 2021, Integration of the circular economy paradigm under the just and safe operating space narrative: twelve operational principles based on circularity, sustainability and resilience, J. Clean. Prod., 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129071 · DOI
  37. Ward, 2016, Is decoupling GDP growth from environmental impact possible?, PLoS One, 11, 10.1371/journal.pone.0164733 · DOI
  38. Welch, 2016, Imagined futures of the circular economy, Everyday Futures, 23
  39. Yin, 1981, The case study as a serious research strategy, Knowledge, 3, 97, 10.1177/107554708100300106 · DOI
  40. Zink, 2017, Circular economy rebound, J. Ind. Ecol., 21, 593, 10.1111/jiec.12545 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 63

Metadata

Authors
Pinyol Alberich, J., Pansera, M., & Hartley, S.
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Cleaner Production
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-01
Volume
385
Pages
135723
ISSN
0959-6526
DOI
10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135723
Cited by
63
References
2
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review