Cited by 67Advanced Drug Delivery SystemsInhalation and Respiratory Drug DeliveryNasal Surgery and Airway Studies

Characterisation of nasal devices for delivery of insulin to the brain and evaluation in humans using functional magnetic resonance imaging

Open access
Wingrove, Jed, Swedrowska, Magda, Scherließ, Regina, Parry, Mark, Ramjeeawon, Mervin, Taylor, David, Gauthier, Gregoire, Brown, Louise +3 more·2019·Journal of Controlled Release

Abstract

This study aimed to characterise three nasal drug delivery devices to evaluate their propensity to deliver human insulin solutions to the nasal cavity for redistribution to the central nervous system. Brain delivery was evaluated using functional magnetic resonance imaging to measure regional cerebral blood flow. Intranasal insulin administration has been hypothesised to exploit nose-to-brain pathways and deliver drug directly to the brain tissue whilst limiting systemic exposure. Three nasal pump-actuator configurations were compared for delivery of 400 IU/mL insulin solution by measuring droplet size distribution, plume geometry, spray pattern and in vitro deposition in a nasal cast. The device with optimal spray properties for nose to brain delivery (spray angle between 30° and 45°; droplet size between 20 and 50 μm) also favoured high posterior-superior deposition in the nasal cast and was utilised in a pharmacological magnetic resonance imaging study. Functional magnetic resonance imaging in healthy male volunteers showed statistically significant decreases in regional cerebral blood flow within areas dense in insulin receptors (bilateral amygdala) in response to intranasally administered insulin (160 IU) compared to saline (control). These changes correspond to the expected effects of insulin in the brain and were achieved using a simple nasal spray device and solution formulation. We recommend that a thorough characterisation of nasal delivery devices and qualitative/quantitative assessment of the administered dose is reported in all studies of nose to brain delivery so that responses can be evaluated with respect to posology and comparison between studies is facilitated.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jconrel.2019.03.032

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Simple nasal atomisers have been proven to reliably trigger functional effects in healthy humans.

    “simple nasal atomisers, 37 which have been proven to reliably trigger functional effects in healthy humans”

    From Intranasal insulin (2021) · cites this paper as [37]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Zelaya, F.O., et al., MR and CT Perfusion and Pharmacokinetic Imaging: Clinical Applications and Theoretical Principles, Chapter 72: Perfusion in Pharmacologic Imaging. 2016: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 1 Har/Psc edition

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wingrove, J., Swedrowska, M., Scherließ, R., Parry, M., Ramjeeawon, M., Taylor, D., Gauthier, G., Brown, L., Amiel, S., Zelaya, F., & Forbes, B.
Affiliations
  • King's College London (GB)
  • Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel (DE)
  • Intertek (United Kingdom) (GB)
  • Nemera (France) (FR)
  • Unilever (United Kingdom) (GB)
Corresponding author
Wingrove, Jed
Venue
Journal of Controlled Release
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-05
Volume
302
Pages
140-147
ISSN
0168-3659 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2927987729
Cited by
67
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 10
FWCI
2.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Controlled Release (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Unilever
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Advanced Drug Delivery Systems
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Inhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
Keywords
intranasal insulin, nose-to-brain delivery, nasal spray, droplet size distribution, spray pattern, nasal deposition, regional cerebral blood flow, amygdala, functional MRI, insulin receptor
MeSH terms
Administration, Intranasal, Adult, Aerosols, Blood Glucose, Brain, C-Peptide, Equipment Design, Humans, Insulin, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Nasal Cavity, Nebulizers and Vaporizers, Particle Size, Tissue Distribution, Drug Delivery Systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review