Cited by 48Diabetes Management and EducationAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMindfulness and Compassion Interventions

Effectiveness of cognitive behavioral therapy-based interventions on psychological symptoms in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus: an update review of randomized controlled trials

Open access
Vlachou, Eugenia, Ntikoudi, Anastasia, Owens, Dimitra Anna, Nikolakopoulou, Maria, Chalimourdas, Thodoris, Cauli, Omar·2022·Journal of Diabetes and its Complications

Abstract

Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) has long been recognized as a type of psychotherapy for the management of glycemic control and comorbid psychological disorders and symptoms in adults with diabetes, and has been previously reported with varying outcomes. The aim of this scoping review is to evaluate the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in order to determine the effects of CBT on Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients regarding depressive and anxiety symptoms, diabetes distress, and quality of life. An extensive literature search was conducted of the Pubmed, Scopus, Cinahl and Medline electronic databases. The search yielded 349 studies, of which 12 eventually met the entry requirements for RCTs. The majority of the studies included in the current scoping review demonstrated the benefits of CBT intervention in the amelioration of depressive symptoms, diabetes-related distress and quality of life in patients with T2DM. However, some studies reported limited evidence to support the use of CBT as an adjuvant therapy. The considerable levels of heterogeneity associated with most RCTs included warrant caution when interpreting results. The findings of this scoping review demonstrate the positive impact of CBT on depressive symptoms and other psychological aspects of everyday life in patients with T2DM.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2022.108185

Cites

60 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cognitive behavioral and mindfulness-based therapies are successful therapeutic approaches for people with diabetes and psychosocial concerns.

    “Successful therapeutic approaches include cognitive behavioral (330,332,348,349) and mindfulness-based therapies (346,350,351).”
  • Educational and behavioral intervention strategies, including education, cognitive behavioral therapy, mindfulness-based therapies, and motivational interviewing, have demonstrated benefits for diabetes distress and, to a lesser degree, glycemic outcomes.

    “Several educational and behavioral intervention strategies have demonstrated benefits for diabetes distress and, to a lesser degree, glycemic outcomes, including education, psychological therapies such as cognitive behavioral therapy and mindfulness-based therapies, and health behavior change approaches such as motivational interviewing (348,349,365,366).”
  • Trials have shown consistent evidence of improvements in depressive symptoms and variable benefits for A1C when depression is simultaneously treated, whether through pharmacological treatment, group therapy, psychotherapy, or collaborative care.

    “Trials have shown consistent evidence of improvements in depressive symptoms and variable benefits for A1C when depression is simultaneously treated (331,392,394), whether through pharmacological treatment, group therapy, psychotherapy, or collaborative care (328,348,349,395,396).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 63 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Hermanns N, Schmitt A, Gahr A, et al. The effect of a diabetes-specific cognitive behavioral treatment program (DIAMOS) for patients with diabetes and subclinical depression: results of a randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Care. 2015;38:551-560. https://doi.org/10.2337/DC14-1416. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vlachou, E., Ntikoudi, A., Owens, D. A., Nikolakopoulou, M., Chalimourdas, T., & Cauli, O.
Affiliations
  • University of West Attica (GR)
  • National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (GR)
  • Universitat de València (ES)
Corresponding author
  • Vlachou, Eugenia
  • Cauli, Omar
Venue
Journal of Diabetes and its Complications
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-05
Volume
36
Issue
5
Pages
108185
ISSN
  • 0891-6632 (ISSN-L)
  • 1056-8727
OpenAlex
W4221099200
Cited by
48
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 2
FWCI
1.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Diabetes and its Complications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
Keywords
cognitive behavioral therapy, type 2 diabetes, depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms, diabetes distress, quality of life, psychological symptoms, glycemic control
MeSH terms
Adult, Anxiety, Depression, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Humans, Psychotherapy, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review