Cited by 816Diabetes Management and EducationMental Health Treatment and AccessChronic Disease Management Strategies

Comorbid Depression is Associated With Increased Health Care Use and Expenditures in Individuals With Diabetes

Egede, Leonard E., Zheng, Deyi, Simpson, Kit·2002·Diabetes Care

Abstract

OBJECTIVE—This study ascertained the odds of diagnosed depression in individuals with diabetes and the relation between depression and health care use and expenditures. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—First, we compared data from 825 adults with diabetes with that from 20,688 adults without diabetes using the 1996 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS). Second, in patients with diabetes, we compared depressed and nondepressed individuals to identify differences in health care use and expenditures. Third, we adjusted use and expenditure estimates for differences in age, sex, race/ethnicity, health insurance, and comorbidity with analysis of covariance. Finally, we used the Consumer Price Index to adjust expenditures for inflation and used SAS and SUDAAN software for statistical analyses. RESULTS—Individuals with diabetes were twice as likely as a comparable sample from the general U.S. population to have diagnosed depression (odds ratio 1.9, 95% CI 1.5–2.5). Younger adults (<65 years), women, and unmarried individuals with diabetes were more likely to have depression. Patients with diabetes and depression had higher ambulatory care use (12 vs. 7, P < 0.0001) and filled more prescriptions (43 vs. 21, P < 0.0001) than their counterparts without depression. Finally, among individuals with diabetes, total health care expenditures for individuals with depression was 4.5 times higher than that for individuals without depression ($247,000,000 vs. $55,000,000, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS—The odds of depression are higher in individuals with diabetes than in those without diabetes. Depression in individuals with diabetes is associated with increased health care use and expenditures, even after adjusting for differences in age, sex, race/ethnicity, health insurance, and comorbidity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/diacare.25.3.464

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Egede, L. E., Zheng, D., & Simpson, K.
Affiliations
Medical University of South Carolina (US)
Venue
Diabetes Care
Published
2002-03-01
Volume
25
Issue
3
Pages
464-470
ISSN
  • 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-5548
OpenAlex
W2087037051
Cited by
816
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 39 · 2017: 44 · 2016: 54 · 2015: 44 · 2014: 60 · 2013: 45 · 2012: 40
FWCI
11.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Diabetes Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (U50/CCU417281-02)
  • Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (1K08HS11418-01, 1P01-HS10871-01)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Chronic Disease Management Strategies
Keywords
depression, diabetes mellitus, comorbidities, health care utilization, health care expenditure, prescription drug use, risk factors for depression, Medical Expenditure Panel Survey
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Costs and Cost Analysis, Delivery of Health Care, Depression, Diabetes Mellitus, Female, Humans, Insurance, Health, Male, Middle Aged, Poverty, Socioeconomic Factors, South Carolina, Comorbidity, White People

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review