Cited by 491Decision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsExperimental Behavioral Economics StudiesFinancial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis

Cognitive abilities and behavioral biases

Open access
Oechssler, Jörg, Roider, Andreas, Schmitz, Patrick W.·2009·Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jebo.2009.04.018

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Oechssler, Roider, and Schmitz (2009) found the CRT to be related to the number of expected-value choices and the tendency to commit the conjunction fallacy.

    “Oechssler, Roider, and Schmitz (2009) found the CRT to be related to the number of expected-value choices and the tendency to commit the conjunction fallacy.”

    From The Cognitive Reflection Test as a predictor of performance on heuristics-and-biases tasks (2011) · cites this paper as Oechssler, Roider, and Schmitz (2009)

  • Recent work on individual differences in cognitive function has begun to challenge the assumption that intelligence tests encompass most of what is important cognitively.

    “Recent work on individual differences in cognitive function has begun to challenge this assumption (Bruine de Bruin et al., 2007;Oechssler et al., 2009;Stanovich, 2009bStanovich, , 2011;;Stanovich & West, 2007, 2008a, 2008b).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Oechssler, J., Roider, A., & Schmitz, P. W.
Affiliations
  • Heidelberg University (DE)
  • University of Cologne (DE)
Corresponding author
Oechssler, Jörg
Venue
Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-10
Volume
72
Issue
1
Pages
147-152
ISSN
0167-2681 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2106553220
Cited by
491
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 72 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 36 · 2015: 42 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 18
FWCI
7.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Social Science Open Access Repository (GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences) (submittedVersion)
  • Trinity's Access to Research Output (TARA) (Trinity College Dublin) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB‐TR 15)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis
Keywords
cognitive ability, behavioral biases, Cognitive Reflection Test, conjunction fallacy, anchoring, time preference, risk preferences, decision-making

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review