Cited by 42Income, Poverty, and InequalityMonetary Policy and Economic ImpactEconomics of Agriculture and Food Markets

Poverty, Seasonal Scarcity and Exchange Asymmetries

Open access
Fehr, Dietmar, Fink, Günther, Jack, Kelsey·2019·National Bureau of Economic Research

Abstract

We are indebted to A. Patrick Behrer for

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3386/w26357

Cites

74 of 74 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The effect of poverty on fluid intelligence (cognitive capacity), initially found by Mani et al. (2013a), did not hold in replication studies (Dalton et al. 2019; Fehr et al. 2019).

    “First, the effect of poverty on fluid intelligence (cognitive capacity), initially found by Mani et al. (2013a), did not hold in replication studies (Dalton et al. 2019; Fehr et al. 2019).”

    From Poverty and economic decision making: a review of scarcity theory (2022) · cites this paper as Fehr et al. 2019

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Fluid intelligence scores did not significantly differ between pre-harvest and post-harvest conditions and before versus after paying back a consumption loan.

    “Fluid intelligence scores did not significantly differ between pre-harvest compared to post-harvest conditions and before vs. after paying back a consumption loan.”

    From Poverty and economic decision making: a review of scarcity theory (2022) · cites this paper as Fehr et al. (2019)

    Section 5.4.2 identifies Raven’s Progressive Matrices as the fluid-intelligence measure and reports little seasonal variation in its scores. Appendix Table A.7 (p. A.11) shows no significant seasonal difference in the individual fixed-effects analysis, although its pooled analysis does show significant differences. The loan analysis compares scores following loan delivery with a control group, not scores before and after loan repayment, so that part of the claim is unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Both the cross-sectional and pre-post elements of Fehr et al. (2019) might have failed to control for all potential confounders, while the experimental manipulation might not have been strong enough to evoke different levels of financial scarcity.

    “As a methodological limitation, we note that both the cross-sectional and pre-post (harvest) elements of the study might have failed to control for all potential confounders, while the experimental manipulation might not have been strong enough to evoke different levels in feelings of financial scarcity.”

    From Poverty and economic decision making: a review of scarcity theory (2022) · cites this paper as Fehr et al. (2019)

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 1 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The results of Fehr et al. (2019) confirmed the trade-off thinking but not the mental bandwidth tax hypothesis of scarcity theory.

    “Overall, results of this study did confirm the trade-off thinking but not the mental bandwidth tax hypothesis of scarcity theory.”

    From Poverty and economic decision making: a review of scarcity theory (2022) · cites this paper as Fehr et al. (2019)

    The Conclusion (p. unavailable) suggests that scarcity led farmers to focus more on the trade-off between items, but qualifies this interpretation with “taken at face value” and “may”; it does not confirm the mechanism. The Introduction (p. unavailable) reports little evidence that cognitive skills or executive function were associated with scarcity or decision quality in this study. That supports a lack of evidence for a bandwidth tax here, not a general rejection of the hypothesis. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Fehr et al. (2019) showed that people facing financial scarcity are less susceptible to the endowment effect than when they face financial abundance.

    “Similarly, Fehr et al. (2019) showed that people facing financial scarcity are less susceptible to the endowment effect than when they face financial abundance.”

    From Poverty and economic decision making: a review of scarcity theory (2022) · cites this paper as Fehr et al. (2019)

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

5 of the 79 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. CAMERER, C. (2015): "The promise of lab-field generalizability in experimental economics: A critical reply to Levitt and List," in Handbook of Experimental Economic Methodology, ed. by G. Frechette and A. Schotter, Oxford University Press.
  2. by D. M. Abhijit Banerjee, Roland Benabou, Oxford University Press, 367-78.
  3. by D. Bern- heim, S. DellaVigna, and D. Laibson, Elsevier, vol. 2.
  4. by D. Bernheim, S. DellaVigna, and D. Laibson, Elsevier, vol. 2.
  5. O'DONOGHUE, T. AND C. SPRENGER (2018): "Reference-dependent preferences," in Handbook of Behavioral Economics, ed. by D. Bernheim, S. DellaVigna, and D. Laibson, Elsevier, vol. 1, 1-77.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fehr, D., Fink, G., & Jack, K.
Affiliations
National Bureau of Economic Research (US)
Venue
National Bureau of Economic Research
Published
2019-10
OpenAlex
W2979754715
Cited by
40
References
79
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1
Type
report
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • National Bureau of Economic Research (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • National Bureau of Economic Research (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • International Growth Centre
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (CRC 649)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Income, Poverty, and Inequality
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Monetary Policy and Economic Impact
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets
Keywords
poverty, seasonal unemployment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review