Cited by 408Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skillsCognitive Abilities and TestingDevelopmental and Educational Neuropsychology

Representation and working memory in early arithmetic

Rasmussen, Carmen, Bisanz, Jeffrey·2005·Journal of Experimental Child Psychology

Abstract

Working memory has been implicated in the early acquisition of arithmetic skill, but the relations among different components of working memory, performance on different types of arithmetic problems, and development have not been explored. Preschool and Grade 1 children completed measures of phonological, visual-spatial, and central executive working memory, as well as nonverbal and verbal arithmetic problems, some of which included irrelevant information. For preschool children, accuracy was higher on nonverbal problems than on verbal problems, and the best and only unique predictor of performance on the standard nonverbal problems was visual-spatial working memory. This finding is consistent with the view that most preschoolers use a mental model for arithmetic that requires visual-spatial working memory. For Grade 1 children, performance was equivalent on nonverbal and verbal problems, and phonological working memory was the best predictor of performance on standard verbal problems. For both age groups, problems with added irrelevant information were substantially more difficult than standard problems, and in some cases measures of the central executive predicted performance. Assessing performance on different components of working memory in conjunction with different types of arithmetic problems provided new insights into the developing relations between working memory and how children do arithmetic.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jecp.2005.01.004

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rasmussen, C., & Bisanz, J.
Affiliations
University of Alberta (CA)
Corresponding author
Rasmussen, Carmen
Venue
Journal of Experimental Child Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-06
Volume
91
Issue
2
Pages
137-157
ISSN
0022-0965 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2020001059
Cited by
408
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 35 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 33 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 19
FWCI
8.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Experimental Child Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
Keywords
working memory, early arithmetic, arithmetic problem solving, visuospatial working memory, phonological working memory, central executive, preschool children, first grade students, verbal arithmetic problems, irrelevant information, mental models, cognitive development
MeSH terms
Child, Child, Preschool, Cognition, Female, Humans, Male, Mathematics, Memory, Phonetics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review