Cited by 70Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skillsCognitive Abilities and TestingDevelopmental and Educational Neuropsychology

The relationship among geometry, working memory, and intelligence in children

Open access
Giofrè, David, Mammarella, Irene Cristina, Cornoldi, Cesare·2014·Journal of Experimental Child Psychology

Abstract

Although geometry is one of the main areas of mathematical learning, the cognitive processes underlying geometry-related academic achievement have not been studied in detail. This study explored the relationship among working memory (WM), intelligence (g factor), and geometry in 176 typically developing children attending school in their fourth and fifth grades. Structural equation modeling showed that approximately 40% of the variance in academic achievement and in intuitive geometry (which is assumed to be independent of a person's cultural background) was explained by WM and the g factor. After taking intelligence and WM into account, intuitive geometry was no longer significantly related to academic achievement in geometry. We also found intuitive geometry to be closely related to fluid intelligence (as measured by Raven's colored progressive matrices) and reasoning ability, whereas academic achievement in geometry depended largely on WM. These results were confirmed by a series of regressions in which we estimated the contributions of WM, intelligence, and intuitive geometry to the unique and shared variance explaining academic achievement in geometry. Theoretical and educational implications of the relationship among WM, intelligence, and academic achievement in geometry are discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jecp.2014.01.002

Cites

88 of 88 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 89 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Gittler, G., & Glück, J. (1998). Differential transfer of learning: Effects of instruction in descriptive geometry on spatial test performance. Journal of Geometry and Graphics, 2(1), 71-84.
  2. Hunt, E. (2011). Human Intelligence (pp. 1-528). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  3. Raven, J., Raven, J. C., & Court, J. H. (1998). Raven Manual, Section 2 (Coloured Progressive Matrices). Oxford, England: Oxford Psychologist Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Giofrè, D., Mammarella, I. C., & Cornoldi, C.
Affiliations
University of Padua (IT)
Corresponding author
Giofrè, David
Venue
Journal of Experimental Child Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-07
Volume
123
Pages
112-128
ISSN
0022-0965 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2000211020
Cited by
70
References
89
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2
FWCI
4.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • Journal of Experimental Child Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Liverpool John Moores University (submittedVersion)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutial Research Information System (University of Genoa) (submittedVersion)
  • Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
Keywords
geometry, working memory, intelligence, fluid intelligence, academic performance, intuitive geometry, reasoning skills, children, mathematics learning, Coloured Progressive Matrices
MeSH terms
Achievement, Aptitude Tests, Child, Concept Formation, Female, Humans, Intelligence, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Models, Psychological, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Problem Solving, Intuition, Mathematical Concepts

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review