Cited by 72Attachment and Relationship DynamicsPersonality Traits and PsychologyEmotions and Moral Behavior

When self-disclosure goes awry: Negative consequences of revealing personal failures for lower self-esteem individuals.

Cameron, Jessica J., Holmes, John G., Vorauer, Jacquie D.·2009·Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jesp.2008.09.009

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cameron, J. J., Holmes, J. G., & Vorauer, J. D.
Affiliations
  • University of Manitoba (CA)
  • University of Waterloo (CA)
Corresponding author
Cameron, Jessica J.
Venue
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-01
Volume
45
Issue
1
Pages
217-222
ISSN
0022-1031 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2010589301
Cited by
71
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 3
FWCI
4.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
Keywords
self-disclosure, self-esteem, personal failure, relationship distress, romantic partners, failure feedback, concealment, dating relationships

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review