Cited by 278Attachment and Relationship DynamicsPersonality Traits and PsychologyDeath Anxiety and Social Exclusion

Through the looking glass darkly? When self-doubts turn into relationship insecurities

Murray, Sandra L., Holmes, John G., MacDonald, Geoff, Ellsworth, Phoebe C.·1998·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Abstract

The authors argue that individuals regulate perceptions of their relationships in a self-protective way, finding virtue in their partners only when they feel confident that their partners also see virtues in them. In 4 experiments, the authors posed an acute threat to low and high self-esteem individuals' feelings of self-worth (e.g., guilt about a transgression, fears of being inconsiderate or intellectually inept). They then collected measures of confidence in the partner's positive regard and acceptance (i.e., reflected appraisals) and perceptions of the partner. The results revealed that low self-esteem individuals reacted to self-doubt with heightened doubts about their partners' regard, which then tarnished impressions of their partners. In contrast, high self-esteem individuals reacted to self-doubts by becoming more convinced of their partners' continued acceptance, using their relationships as a resource for self-affirmation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-3514.75.6.1459

Cites

72 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • People high in self-esteem (HSEs) tend to cultivate high-quality relationships with others and use them as a resource for self-affirmation.

    “In contrast, people high in self-esteem (HSEs) tend to cultivate high-quality relationships with others and use them as a resource for self-affirmation (Murray et al., 1998).”

    From Social media use and systemic inflammation: The moderating role of self-esteem (2021) · cites this paper as Murray et al., 1998

  • LSEs tend to interpret interpersonal events in ways that validate their negative self-views.

    “Notably, LSEs tend to interpret interpersonal events in ways that validate their negative self-views (Murray et al., 1998).”

    From Social media use and systemic inflammation: The moderating role of self-esteem (2021) · cites this paper as Murray et al., 1998

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Murray, S. L., Holmes, J. G., MacDonald, G., & Ellsworth, P. C.
Venue
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Published
1998
Volume
75
Issue
6
Pages
1459-1480
ISSN
  • 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1315
OpenAlex
W2169008446
Cited by
276
References
72
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 15
FWCI
12.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
Keywords
self-esteem, self-doubt, relationship insecurity, self-affirmation, reflected appraisals, partner perceptions, self-worth, self-regulation, guilt, social acceptance, romantic relationships
MeSH terms
Adult, Analysis of Variance, Courtship, Female, Guilt, Humans, Intelligence Tests, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Models, Psychological, Self Concept, Truth Disclosure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review