Cited by 45Personality Traits and PsychologySocial and Intergroup PsychologyIdentity, Memory, and Therapy

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Understanding the relationship between self-esteem and self-clarity: The role of desired self-esteem

DeMarree, Kenneth G., Rios, Kimberly·2014·Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jesp.2013.10.003

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. Bassili, 1996, Meta-judgmental versus operative indexes of psychological attributes: The case of measures of attitude strength, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 637, 10.1037/0022-3514.71.4.637 · DOI
  2. Baumeister, 1989, Self-presentational motivations and personality differences in self-esteem, Journal of Personality, 57, 547, 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1989.tb02384.x · DOI
  3. Bigler, 2001, The divided self revisited: Effects of self-concept clarity and self-concept differentiation on psychological adjustment, Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 20, 396, 10.1521/jscp.20.3.396.22302 · DOI
  4. Campbell, 1990, Self-esteem and clarity of the self-concept, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 538, 10.1037/0022-3514.59.3.538 · DOI · Paper page
  5. DeMarree, 2011, Self-ambivalence and resistance to subtle self-change attempts, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 674, 10.1177/0146167211400097 · DOI
  6. DeMarree, 2007, Self and attitude strength parallels: Focus on accessibility, Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 1, 441, 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00012.x · DOI
  7. DeMarree, 2010, Self-esteem accessibility as attitude strength: On the durability and impactfulness of accessible self-esteem, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 628, 10.1177/0146167210364851 · DOI
  8. Gramzow, 2000, Aspects of self-regulation and self-structure as predictors of perceived emotional distress, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 188, 10.1177/0146167200264006 · DOI
  9. Heine, 2007, In search of East Asian self-enhancement, Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11, 1, 10.1177/1088868306294587 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Higgins, 1987, Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect, Psychological Review, 94, 319, 10.1037/0033-295X.94.3.319 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Kaplan, 1972, On the ambivalence-indifference problem in attitude theory and measurement: A suggested modification of the semantic differential technique, Psychological Bulletin, 77, 361, 10.1037/h0032590 · DOI
  12. Kernis, 1993, There's more to self-esteem than whether it is high or low: The importance of stability of self-esteem, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 1190, 10.1037/0022-3514.65.6.1190 · DOI
  13. Maio, 2007, The Epistemic-Teleologic Model of deliberate self-persuasion, Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11, 46, 10.1177/1088868306294589 · DOI
  14. Markus, 1986, Possible selves, American Psychologist, 41, 954, 10.1037/0003-066X.41.9.954 · DOI · Paper page
  15. McConnell, 2011, The multiple self-aspects framework: Self-concept representation and its implications, Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15, 3, 10.1177/1088868310371101 · DOI
  16. Newby-Clark, 2002, Thinking and caring about cognitive inconsistency: When and for whom does attitudinal ambivalence feel uncomfortable?, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 157, 10.1037/0022-3514.82.2.157 · DOI
  17. Oyserman, 2002, Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses, Psychological Bulletin, 128, 3, 10.1037/0033-2909.128.1.3 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Preacher, 2006, Computational tools for probing interactions in multiple linear regression, multilevel modeling, and latent curve analysis, Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 31, 437, 10.3102/10769986031004437 · DOI
  19. Pyszczynski, 2004, Why do people need self-esteem? A theoretical and empirical review, Psychological Bulletin, 130, 435, 10.1037/0033-2909.130.3.435 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Robins, 2001, Measuring global self-esteem: Construct validation of a single-item measure and the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 151, 10.1177/0146167201272002 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Sedikides, 2003, Pancultural self-enhancement, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 60, 10.1037/0022-3514.84.1.60 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Showers, 1992, Compartmentalization of positive and negative self-knowledge: Keeping bad apples out of the bunch, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 1036, 10.1037/0022-3514.62.6.1036 · DOI
  23. Stucke, 2002, When a grandiose self-image Is threatened: Narcissism and self-concept clarity as predictors of negative emotions and aggression following ego-threat, Journal of Personality, 70, 509, 10.1111/1467-6494.05015 · DOI
  24. Swann, 2007, Do our self-views matter? Self-concept and self-esteem in everyday life, American Psychologist, 62, 84, 10.1037/0003-066X.62.2.84 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Swann, 1984, A battle of wills: Self-verification versus behavioral confirmation, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 1287, 10.1037/0022-3514.46.6.1287 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Swann, 1987, The cognitive-affective crossfire: When self-consistency confronts self-enhancement, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 881, 10.1037/0022-3514.52.5.881 · DOI
  27. Thomas, 2007, Academic self-handicapping: The role of self-concept clarity and students' learning strategies, The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 101, 10.1348/000709905X79644 · DOI
  28. Tormala, 2006, Resisting persuasion by the skin of one's teeth: The hidden success of resisted persuasive messages, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 423, 10.1037/0022-3514.91.3.423 · DOI
  29. Tormala, 2007, Attitude certainty: A review of past findings and emerging perspectives, Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 1, 469, 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00025.x · DOI
  30. Vartanian, 2009, When the body defines the self: Self-concept clarity, internalization, and body image, Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 28, 94, 10.1521/jscp.2009.28.1.94 · DOI
  31. Wu, 2010, Self-concept clarity: A longitudinal study of Hong Kong adolescents, Personality and Individual Differences, 48, 277, 10.1016/j.paid.2009.10.011 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
DeMarree, K. G., & Rios, K.
Affiliations
University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
Corresponding author
DeMarree, Kenneth G.
Venue
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-01
Volume
50
Pages
202-209
ISSN
0022-1031 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2017276412
Cited by
45
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2
FWCI
2.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Identity, Memory, and Therapy
Keywords
self-esteem, self-conception, self-concept clarity, university students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review