Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 57

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Influence of Ni interlayer on microstructure and mechanical properties of laser welded joint of Al/Cu bimetal

Yan, Shenghong, Shi, Yan·2020·Journal of Manufacturing Processes

Abstract

Abstract The dissimilar joint consists of 6061 aluminum and 110 copper with a Ni foil interlayer. The influence of Ni element on the interfacial microstructure composition and bonding properties of the Al/Cu bimetal was systematically investigated. The study results demonstrate that the Ni element can inhibit the diffusion of Al, and fine the microstructure of deleterious phase IMC at the interface zone. The tensile strength of joints with Ni foil increases firstly and then decreases with the increase of laser power, and the maximum is about 126.9 MPa which improves about 27.1 % than that of Al/Cu joints without Ni foil. The fracture surface mainly passes through the (Cu) solid solution and the Al2Cu + AlNi IMCs zone due to the presence of hard and brittle IMCs severely deleterious the joining strength of joints.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jmapro.2020.09.078

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. Xiong, 2018, Microstructure and mechanical properties of Al-Cu joints diffusion-bonded with Ni or Ag interlayer, Vacuum, 147, 187, 10.1016/j.vacuum.2017.10.033 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Zoeram, 2017, Welding parameters analysis and microstructural evolution of dissimilar joints in Al/Bronze processed by friction stir welding and their effect on engineering tensile behavior, Mater Sci Eng A, 687, 288, 10.1016/j.msea.2017.01.071 · DOI
  3. Martinsen, 2015, Joining of dissimilar materials, CIRP Annals, 64, 679, 10.1016/j.cirp.2015.05.006 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Wang, 2018, Influence of diffusion brazing parameters on microstructure and properties of Cu/Al joints, J Manuf Process, 35, 343, 10.1016/j.jmapro.2018.08.020 · DOI
  5. Tavassoli, 2016, Controlling of IMCs layers formation sequence, bond strength and electrical resistance in AlCu bimetal compound casting process, Mater Des, 108, 343, 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.06.076 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Zhou, 2018, Effect of pin profile on microstructure and mechanical properties of friction stir spot welded Al-Cu dissimilar metals, J Manuf Process, 36, 1, 10.1016/j.jmapro.2018.09.017 · DOI
  7. Bhattacharya, 2015, Influence of welding parameters on material flow, mechanical property and intermetallic characterization of friction stir welded AA6063 to HCP copper dissimilar butt joint without offset, Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China, 25, 2833, 10.1016/S1003-6326(15)63909-7 · DOI
  8. Li, 2019, Effects of welding pressure on high-power ultrasonic spot welding of Cu/Al dissimilar metals, J Manuf Process, 46, 194, 10.1016/j.jmapro.2019.07.018 · DOI
  9. Boucherit, 2017, Effect of a Zn interlayer on dissimilar FSSW of Al and Cu, Mater Des, 124, 87, 10.1016/j.matdes.2017.03.063 · DOI
  10. Ni, 2016, Microstructure and mechanical performances of ultrasonic spot welded Al/Cu joints with Al 2219 alloy particle interlayer, Mater Des, 92, 779, 10.1016/j.matdes.2015.12.132 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Zhou, 2017, Microstructures and mechanical behavior of aluminum-copper lap joints, Mater Sci Eng A, 705, 105, 10.1016/j.msea.2017.08.056 · DOI
  12. Solchenbach, 2013, Mechanical characteristics of laser braze-welded aluminium–copper connections, Opt Laser Technol, 54, 249, 10.1016/j.optlastec.2013.06.003 · DOI
  13. Zhou, 2017, Influence of laser offset on laser welding-brazing of Al/brass dissimilar alloys, J Alloys Compd, 717, 78, 10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.05.099 · DOI
  14. Ye, 2019, Effect of Si addition on corrosion behaviors of Cu/Al dissimilar joint brazed with novel Zn-Al-xSi filler metals, J Mater Res Technol, 10.1016/j.jmrt.2019.08.040 · DOI
  15. Song, 2017, Investigation of unequal thickness Mg/steel butt-welded plate by hybrid laser-tungsten inert gas welding with a Ni interlayer, J Manuf Process, 30, 299, 10.1016/j.jmapro.2017.09.019 · DOI
  16. Wang, 2013, The characterization investigation of laser-arc-adhesive hybrid welding of Mg to Al joint using Ni interlayer, Mater Des, 50, 463, 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.02.085 · DOI
  17. Wang, 2019, Laser beam oscillating welding of 5A06 aluminum alloys: microstructure, porosity and mechanical properties, Opt Laser Technol, 111, 58, 10.1016/j.optlastec.2018.09.036 · DOI
  18. Yan, 2019, Influence of laser power on microstructure and mechanical property of laser-welded Al/Cu dissimilar lap joints, J Manuf Process, 45, 312, 10.1016/j.jmapro.2019.07.009 · DOI
  19. Hartel, 2016, Finite element modeling for the structural analysis of Al-Cu laser beam welding, Phys Procedia, 83, 1404, 10.1016/j.phpro.2016.08.147 · DOI
  20. Zuo, 2014, Intermediate layer characterization and fracture behavior of laser-welded copper/aluminum metal joints, Mater Des, 58, 357, 10.1016/j.matdes.2014.02.004 · DOI
  21. Braunovic, 1994, Intermetallic compounds at aluminum-to-copper electrical interfaces: effect of temperature and electric current, Components Packaging & Manufacturing Technol Part A IEEE Trans, 17, 78, 10.1109/95.296372 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Fink, 1934, Equilibrium relations in aluminium–Nickel alloys of high purity, Trans. AIME, 111, 293
  23. Mai, 2004, Characterisation of dissimilar joints in laser welding of steel–kovar, copper–steel and copper–aluminium, Mater Sci Eng A, 374, 224, 10.1016/j.msea.2004.02.025 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Koester, 1948, Microscopic and X-Ray studies towards the understanding of the Cu-Ni-Al system, Z Metallkd, 39, 225
  25. Chen, 2012, Influence of a Ni-foil interlayer on Fe/Al dissimilar joint by laser penetration welding, Mater Lett, 79, 296, 10.1016/j.matlet.2012.03.073 · DOI
  26. Shiming, 2002, 38, 694
  27. Abbasi, 2001, Growth rate of intermetallic compounds in Al/Cu bimetal produced by cold roll welding process, J Alloys Compd, 319, 233, 10.1016/S0925-8388(01)00872-6 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Acarer, 2012, Electrical, Corrosion, and Mechanical Properties of Aluminum-Copper Joints Produced by Explosive Welding, J Mater Eng Perform, 21, 2375, 10.1007/s11665-012-0203-6 · DOI
  29. Wen, 2015, Investigation on effects of process parameters on porosity in dissimilar Al alloy lap fillet welds, Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 81, 843, 10.1007/s00170-015-7276-y · DOI
  30. Zhang, 2012, Microstructure and bonding strength of diffusion welding of Mo/Cu joints with Ni interlayer, Mater Des, 39, 81, 10.1016/j.matdes.2012.02.032 · DOI
  31. Otten, 2015, Electron beam welding of aluminum to copper: mechanical properties and their relation to microstructure, Weld World, 60, 21, 10.1007/s40194-015-0280-x · DOI

Cited by

See all 57

Metadata

Authors
Yan, S., & Shi, Y.
Venue
Journal of Manufacturing Processes
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-11
Volume
59
Pages
343-354
ISSN
1526-6125
Cited by
57
References
1
Language
en
Licence
  • www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
  • www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)
Funders
National Defense Pre-Research Foundation of China

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.