The DOI matches its Crossref record; 70 of the 70 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Updates to the integrated protein-protein interaction benchmarks: docking benchmark version 5 and affinity benchmark version 2
Open accessAbstract
We present an updated and integrated version of our widely used protein-protein docking and binding affinity benchmarks. The benchmarks consist of non-redundant, high-quality structures of protein-protein complexes along with the unbound structures of their components. Fifty-five new complexes were added to the docking benchmark, 35 of which have experimentally measured binding affinities. These updated docking and affinity benchmarks now contain 230 and 179 entries, respectively. In particular, the number of antibody-antigen complexes has increased significantly, by 67% and 74% in the docking and affinity benchmarks, respectively. We tested previously developed docking and affinity prediction algorithms on the new cases. Considering only the top 10 docking predictions per benchmark case, a prediction accuracy of 38% is achieved on all 55 cases and up to 50% for the 32 rigid-body cases only. Predicted affinity scores are found to correlate with experimental binding energies up to r=0.52 overall and r=0.72 for the rigid complexes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs
Altschul, S. (1997) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/25.17.3389 · Cited by 73,302
Berman, H. M. (2000) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/28.1.235 · Cited by 40,196
Crystallography & NMR System: A New Software Suite for Macromolecular Structure Determination
Brünger, A. T., Adams, P. D., Clore, G. M., DeLano, W. L., Gros, P., Grosse‐Kunstleve, R. W., Jiang, J., Kuszewski, J. J., Nilges, M., Pannu, N., et al. (1998) · Acta Crystallographica Section D Biological Crystallography · doi:10.1107/s0907444998003254 · Cited by 15,723
A Second Generation Force Field for the Simulation of Proteins, Nucleic Acids, and Organic Molecules
Cornell, W. D., Cieplak, P., Bayly, C. I., Gould, I. R., Merz, K. M., Ferguson, D. M., Spellmeyer, D. C., Fox, T., Caldwell, J. W., & Kollman, P. A. (1995) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja00124a002 · Cited by 13,111
Murzin, A. G., Brenner, S. E., Hubbard, T., & Chothia, C. (1995) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/s0022-2836(05)80134-2 · Cited by 6,435
Jorgensen, W. L., & Tirado‐Rives, J. (1988) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja00214a001 · Cited by 5,060
HADDOCK: A Protein−Protein Docking Approach Based on Biochemical or Biophysical Information
Dominguez, C., Boelens, R., & Bonvin, A. M. J. J. (2003) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja026939x · Cited by 3,187
Self-citationStatistical potential for assessment and prediction of protein structures
Shen, M., & Šali, A. (2006) · Protein Science · doi:10.1110/ps.062416606 · Cited by 2,294
ZDOCK server: interactive docking prediction of protein–protein complexes and symmetric multimers
Pierce, B. G., Wiehe, K. J., Hwang, H., Kim, B., Vreven, T., & Weng, Z. (2014) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btu097 · Cited by 1,767
Self-citationZDOCK: An initial‐stage protein‐docking algorithm
Chen, R., Li, L., & Weng, Z. (2003) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.10389 · Cited by 1,393
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 421
Yu, W., Jo, S., Lakkaraju, S. K., Weber, D. J., & MacKerell, A. D. (2018) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.25650 · Cited by 35
Methods for sequence and structural analysis of B and T cell receptor repertoires
Teraguchi, S., Saputri, D. S., Llamas-Covarrubias, M. A., Davila, A., Díez, D., Nazlica, S. A., Rozewicki, J., Ismanto, H. S., Wilamowski, J., Xie, J., et al. (2020) · Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1016/j.csbj.2020.07.008 · Cited by 35
A benchmark testing ground for integrating homology modeling and protein docking
Bohnuud, T., Luo, L., Wodak, S. J., Bonvin, A. M. J. J., Weng, Z., Vajda, S., Schueler‐Furman, O., & Kozakov, D. (2016) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.25063 · Cited by 33
Self-citationAlam, N., & Schueler‐Furman, O. (2017) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-6798-8_9 · Cited by 33
Protein–protein interaction specificity is captured by contact preferences and interface composition
Nadalin, F., & Carbone, A. (2017) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btx584 · Cited by 33
Local Interaction Signal Analysis Predicts Protein-Protein Binding Affinity
Raucci, R., Laine, É., & Carbone, A. (2018) · Structure · doi:10.1016/j.str.2018.04.006 · Cited by 32
Enhanced antibody-antigen structure prediction from molecular docking using AlphaFold2
Gaudreault, F., Corbeil, C. R., & Sulea, T. I. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-42090-5 · Cited by 32
ISPRED4: interaction sites PREDiction in protein structures with a refining grammar model
Savojardo, C., Fariselli, P., Martelli, P. L., & Casadio, R. (2017) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btx044 · Cited by 34
IRaPPA: information retrieval based integration of biophysical models for protein assembly selection
Moal, I. H., Barradas‐Bautista, D., Jiménez‐García, B., Torchala, M., van der Velde, A., Vreven, T., Weng, Z., Bates, P. A., & Fernández‐Recio, J. (2017) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btx068 · Cited by 33
Self-citationQuignot, C., Postic, G., Bret, H., Rey, J., Granger, P., Murail, S., Chacón, P., Andréani, J., Tufféry, P., & Guérois, R. (2021) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkab358 · Cited by 34
Beyond sequence: Structure-based machine learning
Durairaj, J., de Ridder, D., & van Dijk, A. D. J. (2022) · Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1016/j.csbj.2022.12.039 · Cited by 32
AbAdapt: an adaptive approach to predicting antibody–antigen complex structures from sequence
Davila, A., Xu, Z., Li, S., Rozewicki, J., Wilamowski, J., Kotelnikov, S., Kozakov, D., Teraguchi, S., & Standley, D. M. (2022) · Bioinformatics Advances · doi:10.1093/bioadv/vbac015 · Cited by 33
Contact Potential for Structure Prediction of Proteins and Protein Complexes from Potts Model
Anishchenko, I., Kundrotas, P. J., & Vakser, I. A. (2018) · Biophysical Journal · doi:10.1016/j.bpj.2018.07.035 · Cited by 29
Quantification of biases in predictions of protein–protein binding affinity changes upon mutations
Tsishyn, M., Pucci, F., & Rooman, M. J. (2023) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbad491 · Cited by 33
Docking approaches for modeling multi-molecular assemblies
Rosell, M., & Fernández‐Recio, J. (2020) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2020.05.016 · Cited by 28
Chen, X., Morehead, A., Liu, J., & Cheng, J. (2023) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btad203 · Cited by 29
ProPOSE: Direct Exhaustive Protein–Protein Docking with Side Chain Flexibility
Hogues, H., Gaudreault, F., Corbeil, C. R., Deprez, C., Sulea, T. I., & Purisima, E. O. (2018) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.8b00225 · Cited by 27
Protein–Protein Interaction Interfaces and their Functional Implications
Schreiber, G. (2020) · Royal Society of Chemistry eBooks · doi:10.1039/9781788016544-00001 · Cited by 29
The Subtle Trade-Off between Evolutionary and Energetic Constraints in Protein–Protein Interactions
Marchetti, F., Capelli, R., Rizzato, F., Laio, A., & Colombo, G. (2019) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1021/acs.jpclett.9b00191 · Cited by 26
Application of site-identification by ligand competitive saturation in computer-aided drug design
Goel, H., Hazel, A. J., Yu, W., Jo, S., & MacKerell, A. D. (2021) · New Journal of Chemistry · doi:10.1039/d1nj04028f · Cited by 25
Mapping of antibody epitopes based on docking and homology modeling
Desta, I., Kotelnikov, S., Jones, G. S., Ghani, U., Abyzov, M., Kholodov, Y. A., Standley, D. M., Sabitova, M., Beglov, D., Vajda, S., et al. (2022) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.26420 · Cited by 25
Pereira, G. P., Gouzien, C., Souza, P. C. T., & Martin, J. (2024) · Bioinformatics Advances · doi:10.1093/bioadv/vbaf056 · Cited by 26
Paratope states in solution improve structure prediction and docking
Fernández‐Quintero, M. L., Vangone, A., Loeffler, J. R., Seidler, C. A., Georges, G. J., & Liedl, K. R. (2021) · Structure · doi:10.1016/j.str.2021.11.001 · Cited by 25
Self-citationThe Current Limits in Virtual Screening and Property Prediction
Hutter, M. C. (2018) · Future Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.4155/fmc-2017-0303 · Cited by 24
Protein–Protein Interaction Methods and Protein Phase Separation
Savojardo, C., Martelli, P. L., & Casadio, R. (2020) · Annual Review of Biomedical Data Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-biodatasci-011720-104428 · Cited by 26
Neural message passing for joint paratope-epitope predictionPreprint
Vecchio, A. D., Deac, A., Lió, P., & Veličković, P. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2106.00757 · Cited by 31
DIPS-Plus: The enhanced database of interacting protein structures for interface prediction
Morehead, A., Chen, C., Sedova, A., & Cheng, J. (2023) · Scientific Data · doi:10.1038/s41597-023-02409-3 · Cited by 26
PPB-Affinity: Protein-Protein Binding Affinity dataset for AI-based protein drug discovery
Liu, H., Chen, P., Zhai, X., Huo, K.-G., Zhou, S., Han, L., & Fan, G. (2024) · Scientific Data · doi:10.1038/s41597-024-03997-4 · Cited by 30
A membrane protein complex docking benchmark
Koukos, P. I., Faro, I., van Noort, C. W., & Bonvin, A. M. J. J. (2018) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2018.11.005 · Cited by 23
Self-citationA Structure-Based B-cell Epitope Prediction Model Through Combing Local and Global Features
Lu, S., Li, Y., Ma, Q., Nan, X., & Zhang, S. (2022) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2022.890943 · Cited by 23
Schweke, H., Xu, Q., Tauriello, G., Pantolini, L., Schwede, T. F., Cazals, F., Lhéritier, A., Fernández‐Recio, J., Rodríguez‐Lumbreras, L. A., Schueler‐Furman, O., et al. (2023) · PROTEOMICS · doi:10.1002/pmic.202200323 · Cited by 23
Self-citationStructural Prediction of Protein–Protein Interactions by Docking: Application to Biomedical Problems
Barradas‐Bautista, D., Rosell, M., Pallara, C., & Fernández‐Recio, J. (2017) · Advances in protein chemistry and structural biology · doi:10.1016/bs.apcsb.2017.06.003 · Cited by 24
Different protein-protein interface patterns predicted by different machine learning methods
Wang, W., Yang, Y. X., Yin, J., & Gong, X. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-16397-z · Cited by 23
Integrating Cross-Linking Experiments with Ab Initio Protein–Protein Docking
Vreven, T., Schweppe, D. K., Chavez, J. D., Weisbrod, C. R., Shibata, S., Zheng, C., Bruce, J. E., & Weng, Z. (2018) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2018.04.010 · Cited by 23
Self-citationMohseni Behbahani, Y., Laine, E., & Carbone, A. (2023) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btad231 · Cited by 23
Binding free energy analysis of protein-protein docking model structures by evERdock
Takemura, K., Matubayasi, N., & Kitao, A. (2018) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.5019864 · Cited by 22
PepPro: A Nonredundant Structure Data Set for Benchmarking Peptide–Protein Computational Docking
Xu, X., & Zou, X. (2019) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.26114 · Cited by 22
Yang, Y. X., Wang, P., & Zhu, B. T. (2021) · Biophysical Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.bpc.2022.106762 · Cited by 23
Rotation invariance and equivariance in 3D deep learning: a survey
Fei, J., & Deng, Z. (2024) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-024-10741-2 · Cited by 22
Coarse‐grained and atomic resolution biomolecular docking with the ATTRACT approach
Glashagen, G., de Vries, S. J., Uciechowska‐Kaczmarzyk, U., Samsonov, S. A., Murail, S., Tufféry, P., & Zacharias, M. (2019) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.25860 · Cited by 23
Deep Learning for Flexible and Site-Specific Protein Docking and DesignPreprint
McPartlon, M., & Xu, J. (2023) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2023.04.01.535079 · Cited by 24
Structural analogue-based protein structure domain assembly assisted by deep learning
Peng, C.-X., Zhou, X.-G., Xia, Y.-H., Liu, J., Hou, M.-H., & Zhang, G.-J. (2022) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btac553 · Cited by 21
ComDock: A novel approach for protein-protein docking with an efficient fusing strategy
Meng, Q., Guo, F., Wang, E., & Tang, J. (2023) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.107660 · Cited by 20
Integrating ab initio and template-based algorithms for protein–protein complex structure prediction
Vangaveti, S., Vreven, T., Zhang, Y., & Weng, Z. (2019) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btz623 · Cited by 20
Self-citationInformation-Driven Docking for TCR-pMHC Complex Prediction
Peacock, T., & Chain, B. (2021) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2021.686127 · Cited by 20
TRScore: a 3D RepVGG-based scoring method for ranking protein docking models
Guo, L., He, J., Lin, P., Huang, S., & Wang, J. (2022) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btac120 · Cited by 19
Review and Comparative Analysis of Methods and Advancements in Predicting Protein Complex Structure
Zhao, N., Wu, T., Wang, W., Zhang, L., & Gong, X. (2024) · Interdisciplinary Sciences Computational Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/s12539-024-00626-x · Cited by 20
Computational Methods to Predict Conformational B-Cell Epitopes
Carroll, M., Rosenbaum, E., & Viswanathan, R. (2024) · Biomolecules · doi:10.3390/biom14080983 · Cited by 19
Neveu, É., Ritchie, D. W., Popov, P. A., & Grudinin, S. (2016) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btw443 · Cited by 19
A structure-based model for the prediction of protein–RNA binding affinity
Nithin, C., Mukherjee, S., & Bahadur, R. P. (2019) · RNA · doi:10.1261/rna.071779.119 · Cited by 19
Torchala, M., Gerguri, T., Chaleil, R. A. G., Gordon, P., Russell, F., Keshani, M., & Bates, P. A. (2019) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.25851 · Cited by 19
Self-citationGeometric Transformers for Protein Interface Contact PredictionPreprint
Morehead, A., Chen, C., & Cheng, J. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2110.02423 · Cited by 19
Protein—protein binding supersites
Viswanathan, R., Fajardo, E. J., Steinberg, G., Haller, M. D., & Fiser, A. (2019) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006704 · Cited by 18
Porter, K. A., Padhorny, D., Desta, I., Ignatov, M., Beglov, D., Kotelnikov, S., Sun, Z., Alekseenko, A. E., Anishchenko, I. V., Cong, Q., et al. (2019) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.25808 · Cited by 18
A knowledge-based scoring function to assess quaternary associations of proteins
Dhawanjewar, A. S., Roy, A., & Madhusudhan, M. S. (2020) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa207 · Cited by 18
Predicting Protein Functional Motions: an Old Recipe with a New Twist
Grudinin, S., Laine, É., & Hoffmann, A. (2020) · Biophysical Journal · doi:10.1016/j.bpj.2020.03.020 · Cited by 18
Are transient protein-protein interactions more dispensable?
Ghadie, M. A., & Xia, Y. (2022) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010013 · Cited by 19
Estimating Absolute Protein–Protein Binding Free Energies by a Super Learner Model
Chaves, E. J. F., Sartori, J., Santos, W. M., da Cruz, C. H. B., Mhrous, E. N., Nacimento-Filho, M. F., Ferraz, M. V. F., & Lins, R. D. (2025) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.4c01641 · Cited by 17
Spatom: a graph neural network for structure-based protein–protein interaction site prediction
Wu, H., Han, J., Zhang, S., Xin, G., Mou, C., & Liu, J. (2023) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbad345 · Cited by 17
Zhao, N., Han, B., Zhao, C., Xu, J., & Gong, X. (2024) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbae048 · Cited by 19
EpiScan: accurate high-throughput mapping of antibody-specific epitopes using sequence information
Wang, C., Wang, J., Song, W., Luo, G., & Jiang, T. (2024) · npj Systems Biology and Applications · doi:10.1038/s41540-024-00432-7 · Cited by 17
Pang, J., Xu, D., Zhang, X., Qu, J., Jiang, J., Suo, J., Li, T., Li, Y., & Peng, Z. (2025) · Free Radical Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2025.02.020 · Cited by 17
Rigid-Docking Approaches to Explore Protein–Protein Interaction Space
Matsuzaki, Y., Uchikoga, N., Ohue, M., & Akiyama, Y. (2016) · Advances in biochemical engineering, biotechnology · doi:10.1007/10_2016_41 · Cited by 18
GalaxyHeteromer: protein heterodimer structure prediction by template-based and ab initio docking
Park, T., Won, J., Baek, M., & Seok, C. (2021) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkab422 · Cited by 17
Performance of ZDOCK and IRAD in CAPRI rounds 28–34
Vreven, T., Pierce, B. G., Borrman, T. M., & Weng, Z. (2016) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.25186 · Cited by 17
Self-citationUpdate of the ATTRACT force field for the prediction of protein-protein binding affinity
Chéron, J.-B., Zacharias, M., Antonczak, S., & Fiorucci, S. (2017) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.24836 · Cited by 17
Marín-López, M. A., Planas-Iglesias, J., Aguirre‐Plans, J., Bonet, J., Garcı́a-Garcı́a, J., Fernández‐Fuentes, N., & Oliva, B. (2017) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btx616 · Cited by 16
Li, M., Shi, Y., Hu, S., Hu, S., Guo, P., Wan, W., Zhang, L. Y., Pan, S., Li, J., Sun, L., et al. (2024) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btae579 · Cited by 16
Rudden, L. S. P., & Degiacomi, M. T. (2019) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.9b00474 · Cited by 16
Orengo, C. A., Velankar, S. S., Wodak, S. J., Zoete, V., Bonvin, A. M. J. J., Elofsson, A., Feenstra, K. A., Gerloff, D. L., Hamelryck, T., Hancock, J. M., et al. (2020) · F1000Research · doi:10.12688/f1000research.20559.1 · Cited by 16
Self-citationDomain-agnostic predictions of nanoscale interactions in proteins and nanoparticles
Saldinger, J. C., Raymond, M., Elvati, P., & Violi, A. (2023) · Nature Computational Science · doi:10.1038/s43588-023-00438-x · Cited by 16
Induced fit with replica exchange improves protein complex structure prediction
Harmalkar, A., Mahajan, S. P., & Gray, J. J. (2022) · PLOS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010124 · Cited by 16
Protein Interaction Energy Landscapes are Shaped by Functional and also Non-functional Partners
Schweke, H., Mucchielli, M.-H., Sacquin-Mora, S., Bei, W., & Lopes, A. (2020) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2019.12.047 · Cited by 15
Deep Local Analysis evaluates protein docking conformations with locally oriented cubes
Mohseni Behbahani, Y., Crouzet, S., Laine, E., & Carbone, A. (2022) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btac551 · Cited by 16
MPAD: A Database for Binding Affinity of Membrane Protein–protein Complexes and their Mutants
Ridha, F., Kulandaisamy, A., & Gromiha, M. M. (2022) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2022.167870 · Cited by 15
Jia, P., Zhang, F., Wu, C., & Li, M. (2024) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbae162 · Cited by 15
Barozet, A., Bianciotto, M., Siméon, T., Minoux, H., & Cortés, J. (2018) · Immunology Letters · doi:10.1016/j.imlet.2018.06.002 · Cited by 15
Performance of ZDOCK and IRAD in CAPRI rounds 39‐45
Vreven, T., Vangaveti, S., Borrman, T. M., Gaines, J. C., & Weng, Z. (2020) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.25873 · Cited by 15
Self-citationTransmembrane Protein Docking with JabberDock
Rudden, L. S. P., & Degiacomi, M. T. (2021) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.0c01315 · Cited by 15
Lagarde, N., Carbone, A., & Sacquin‐Mora, S. (2018) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.25506 · Cited by 15
Zheng, F., Jiang, X., Wen, Y., Yang, Y., & Li, M. (2024) · Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1016/j.csbj.2023.12.018 · Cited by 14
GDockScore: a graph-based protein–protein docking scoring function
McFee, M. C., & Kim, P. M. (2023) · Bioinformatics Advances · doi:10.1093/bioadv/vbad072 · Cited by 14
Xie, J., Zhang, Y., Wang, Z., Jin, X., Lü, X., Ge, S., & Min, X. (2025) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/s12859-025-06123-2 · Cited by 15
Bota, P. M., Aguirre‐Plans, J., Meseguer, A., Cristiano, G., Segura, J., Planas-Iglesias, J., Garcı́a-Garcı́a, J., Güney, E., Oliva, B., & Fernández‐Fuentes, N. (2020) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2020.09.015 · Cited by 14
Machine-learning-assisted universal protein activation in living mice
Wang, X., Liu, Y., Wang, Z., Zeng, X., Ngai, W. S. C., Wang, J., Zhang, H., Xie, X., Zhu, R., Fan, X., et al. (2025) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2025.05.006 · Cited by 14
Benchmarking of structure refinement methods for protein complex models
Verburgt, J. C., & Kihara, D. (2021) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.26188 · Cited by 14
Jung, Y. G., Geng, C., Bonvin, A. M. J. J., Xue, L. C., & Honavar, V. (2023) · Biomolecules · doi:10.3390/biom13010121 · Cited by 13
Self-citationIntegrating diverse experimental information to assist protein complex structure prediction by GRASP
Xie, Y., Zhang, C., Li, S., Du, X., Lu, Y., Wang, M., Hu, Y., Chen, Z., Liu, S., & Gao, Y. Q. (2025) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-025-02820-1 · Cited by 14
A random forest classifier for protein–protein docking models
Barradas‐Bautista, D., Cao, Z. Z., Vangone, A., Oliva, R., & Cavallo, L. (2021) · Bioinformatics Advances · doi:10.1093/bioadv/vbab042 · Cited by 13
Self-citationFrom complete cross-docking to partners identification and binding sites predictions
Dequeker, C., Behbahani, Y. M., David, L., Laine, É., & Carbone, A. (2022) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009825 · Cited by 13
Basu, S., Chakravarty, D., Bhattacharyya, D., Saha, P., & Patra, H. K. (2021) · Journal of Molecular Modeling · doi:10.1007/s00894-021-04779-0 · Cited by 13
Deciphering interaction fingerprints from protein molecular surfacesPreprint
Gaínza, P., Sverrisson, F., Monti, F., Rodolà, E., Bronstein, M., & Correia, B. (2019) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/606202 · Cited by 13
Residue-Frustration-Based Prediction of Protein–Protein Interactions Using Machine Learning
Zhou, X., Song, H., & Li, J. (2022) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/acs.jpcb.1c10525 · Cited by 12
DockNet: high-throughput protein–protein interface contact prediction
Williams, N. P., Rodrigues, C. H. M., Truong, J. Q., Ascher, D. B., & Holien, J. K. (2022) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btac797 · Cited by 12
Sunny, S., Prakash, P. B., Gopakumar, G., & Jayaraj, P. B. (2023) · The Protein Journal · doi:10.1007/s10930-023-10121-9 · Cited by 12
Sasse, A., de Vries, S. J., Schindler, C., de Beauchêne, I. C., & Zacharias, M. (2017) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0170625 · Cited by 12
Barradas‐Bautista, D., Moal, I. H., & Fernández‐Recio, J. (2017) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.25289 · Cited by 12
Self-citationPrediction of Biomolecular Complexes
Vangone, A., Oliva, R., Cavallo, L., & Bonvin, A. M. J. J. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-024-1069-3_8 · Cited by 13
Self-citationLiu, W., Ren, J., Zhang, J., Song, X., Liu, S., Chi, X., Chen, Y., Wen, Z., Li, J., & Chen, W. (2017) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0177012 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Vreven, T., Moal, I. H., Vangone, A., Pierce, B. G., Kastritis, P. L., Torchala, M., Chaleil, R., Jiménez-García, B., Bates, P. A., Fernandez-Recio, J., Bonvin, A. M. J. J., & Weng, Z.
- Affiliations
- University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School (US)
- Barcelona Supercomputing Center (ES)
- Utrecht University (NL)
- The Francis Crick Institute (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Bates, Paul A.
- Bonvin, Alexandre M.J.J.
- Weng, Zhiping
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Molecular Biology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-09
- Volume
- 427
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- 3031-3041
- ISSN
- 0022-2836 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC4677049
- OpenAlex
- W1030883578
- Cited by
- 424
- References
- 70
- Citations by year
- 2026: 28 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 45 · 2022: 58 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 40 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 23
- FWCI
- 13.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Journal of Molecular Biology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
- UPCommons institutional repository (Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
- eScholarship@UMassChan (submittedVersion)
- Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- RECERCAT (Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
- Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Cancer Research UK (10748)
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM084884)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Enzyme Structure and Function
- Keywords
- protein-protein docking, binding affinity prediction, docking benchmark, protein-protein complex, immune complexes, rigid-body docking
- MeSH terms
- Algorithms, Animals, Humans, Polynucleotide Adenylyltransferase, Protein Binding, Protein Conformation, Proteins, Software, Thermodynamics, Vaccinia virus, Viral Proteins, Protein Interaction Mapping, Molecular Docking Simulation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review