The DOI matches its Crossref record; 70 of the 70 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Updates to the integrated protein-protein interaction benchmarks: docking benchmark version 5 and affinity benchmark version 2
Open accessAbstract
We present an updated and integrated version of our widely used protein-protein docking and binding affinity benchmarks. The benchmarks consist of non-redundant, high-quality structures of protein-protein complexes along with the unbound structures of their components. Fifty-five new complexes were added to the docking benchmark, 35 of which have experimentally measured binding affinities. These updated docking and affinity benchmarks now contain 230 and 179 entries, respectively. In particular, the number of antibody-antigen complexes has increased significantly, by 67% and 74% in the docking and affinity benchmarks, respectively. We tested previously developed docking and affinity prediction algorithms on the new cases. Considering only the top 10 docking predictions per benchmark case, a prediction accuracy of 38% is achieved on all 55 cases and up to 50% for the 32 rigid-body cases only. Predicted affinity scores are found to correlate with experimental binding energies up to r=0.52 overall and r=0.72 for the rigid complexes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs
Altschul, S. (1997) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/25.17.3389 · Cited by 73,302
Berman, H. M. (2000) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/28.1.235 · Cited by 40,196
Crystallography & NMR System: A New Software Suite for Macromolecular Structure Determination
Brünger, A. T., Adams, P. D., Clore, G. M., DeLano, W. L., Gros, P., Grosse‐Kunstleve, R. W., Jiang, J., Kuszewski, J. J., Nilges, M., Pannu, N., et al. (1998) · Acta Crystallographica Section D Biological Crystallography · doi:10.1107/s0907444998003254 · Cited by 15,723
A Second Generation Force Field for the Simulation of Proteins, Nucleic Acids, and Organic Molecules
Cornell, W. D., Cieplak, P., Bayly, C. I., Gould, I. R., Merz, K. M., Ferguson, D. M., Spellmeyer, D. C., Fox, T., Caldwell, J. W., & Kollman, P. A. (1995) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja00124a002 · Cited by 13,111
Murzin, A. G., Brenner, S. E., Hubbard, T., & Chothia, C. (1995) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/s0022-2836(05)80134-2 · Cited by 6,435
Jorgensen, W. L., & Tirado‐Rives, J. (1988) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja00214a001 · Cited by 5,060
HADDOCK: A Protein−Protein Docking Approach Based on Biochemical or Biophysical Information
Dominguez, C., Boelens, R., & Bonvin, A. M. J. J. (2003) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja026939x · Cited by 3,187
Self-citationStatistical potential for assessment and prediction of protein structures
Shen, M., & Šali, A. (2006) · Protein Science · doi:10.1110/ps.062416606 · Cited by 2,294
ZDOCK server: interactive docking prediction of protein–protein complexes and symmetric multimers
Pierce, B. G., Wiehe, K. J., Hwang, H., Kim, B., Vreven, T., & Weng, Z. (2014) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btu097 · Cited by 1,767
Self-citationZDOCK: An initial‐stage protein‐docking algorithm
Chen, R., Li, L., & Weng, Z. (2003) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.10389 · Cited by 1,393
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 421
Liu, B., Zhang, Z., Lu, S., He, Q., Deng, N., Meng, H., Pan, C., Li, H., Liu, M., Huang, A., et al. (2020) · Journal of Molecular Graphics and Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.jmgm.2020.107619 · Cited by 12
Benchmark Sets for Binding Hot Spot Identification in Fragment-Based Ligand Discovery
Wakefield, A., Yueh, C., Beglov, D., Castilho, M. S., Kozakov, D., Keserű, G. M., Whitty, A., & Vajda, S. (2020) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.0c00877 · Cited by 12
Rodrigues, C. H. M., & Ascher, D. B. (2022) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkac381 · Cited by 12
Domain-Based Protein Docking with Extremely Large Conformational Changes
Christoffer, C. W., & Kihara, D. (2022) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2022.167820 · Cited by 12
Varela, D., Karlin, V., & André, I. (2022) · Structure · doi:10.1016/j.str.2022.09.005 · Cited by 12
Wang, B., Su, Z., & Wu, Y. (2021) · Genomics Proteomics & Bioinformatics · doi:10.1016/j.gpb.2021.03.004 · Cited by 11
Faruk, N. F., Peng, X., Freed, K. F., Roux, B., & Sosnick, T. R. (2022) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.1c01255 · Cited by 11
Larrea, A., Jebari‐Benslaiman, S., García, U. G., Urteaga, A. S. J., Uribe, K. B., Benito‐Vicente, A., & Martı́n, C. (2023) · Current Atherosclerosis Reports · doi:10.1007/s11883-023-01154-7 · Cited by 12
ComplexQA: a deep graph learning approach for protein complex structure assessment
Zhang, L., Wang, S., Hou, J., Si, D., Zhu, J., & Cao, R. (2023) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbad287 · Cited by 11
HOPMA: Boosting Protein Functional Dynamics with Colored Contact Maps
Laine, É., & Grudinin, S. (2021) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/acs.jpcb.0c11633 · Cited by 11
FPDock: Protein–protein docking using flower pollination algorithm
Sunny, S., & Jayaraj, P. B. (2021) · Computational Biology and Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2021.107518 · Cited by 11
Hierarchical representation for PPI sites prediction
Quadrini, M., Daberdaku, S., & Ferrari, C. (2022) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/s12859-022-04624-y · Cited by 11
Interface refinement of low- to medium-resolution Cryo-EM complexes using HADDOCK2.4
Neijenhuis, T., van Keulen, S. C., & Bonvin, A. M. J. J. (2022) · Structure · doi:10.1016/j.str.2022.02.001 · Cited by 12
Self-citationRRDB: a comprehensive and non-redundant benchmark for RNA–RNA docking and scoring
Yan, Y., & Huang, S. (2017) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btx615 · Cited by 11
Improving B-cell epitope prediction
Yu, H., Joseph‐McCarthy, D., & Vajda, S. (2025) · Drug Discovery Today · doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2025.104489 · Cited by 11
Analysis of Protein-Protein Interaction Networks through Computational Approaches
Han, Y., Cheng, L., & Sun, W. (2019) · Protein and Peptide Letters · doi:10.2174/0929866526666191105142034 · Cited by 10
Tandon, H., de Brevern, A. G., & Srinivasan, N. (2020) · Structure · doi:10.1016/j.str.2020.11.015 · Cited by 10
Kurciński, M., Kmiecik, S., Zalewski, M., & Koliński, A. (2021) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms22147341 · Cited by 10
INTERCAAT: identifying interface residues between macromolecules
Grudman, S., Fajardo, J. E., & Fiser, A. (2021) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btab596 · Cited by 10
Belapure, J., Sorokina, M., & Kastritis, P. L. (2022) · Protein Science · doi:10.1002/pro.4523 · Cited by 10
Self-citationHan, L., Yang, Q., Liu, Z., Li, Y., & Wang, R. (2018) · Future Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.4155/fmc-2017-0261 · Cited by 10
Computational Modeling of Designed Ankyrin Repeat Protein Complexes with Their Targets
Radom, F., Paci, E., & Plückthun, A. (2019) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2019.05.005 · Cited by 11
EROS-DOCK: protein–protein docking using exhaustive branch-and-bound rotational search
Echartea, M. E. R., de Beauchêne, I. C., & Ritchie, D. W. (2019) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btz434 · Cited by 10
Predicting Protein–Protein Interfaces that Bind Intrinsically Disordered Protein Regions
Wong, E. T. C., & Gsponer, J. A. (2019) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2019.06.010 · Cited by 10
Dey, S., & Levy, E. D. (2021) · Structure · doi:10.1016/j.str.2021.07.012 · Cited by 10
Scafuri, N., Soler, M. A., Spitaleri, A., & Rocchia, W. (2021) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.1c00789 · Cited by 10
Identifying functionally informative evolutionary sequence profiles
Gil, N., & Fiser, A. (2017) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btx779 · Cited by 10
Mukherjee, S., Nithin, C., Divakaruni, Y., & Bahadur, R. P. (2018) · Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics · doi:10.1080/07391102.2018.1453379 · Cited by 10
AF3Score: A Score-Only Adaptation of AlphaFold3 for Biomolecular Structure Evaluation
Liu, Y., Yu, Q., Wang, D., & Chen, M. (2025) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.5c00653 · Cited by 9
ParaSurf: a surface-based deep learning approach for paratope–antigen interaction prediction
Papadopoulos, A.-M., Axenopoulos, A., Iatrou, A., Stamatopoulos, K., Alvarez, F., & Daras, P. (2025) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btaf062 · Cited by 9
Li, H., Nithin, C., Kmiecik, S., & Huang, S. (2025) · Drug Discovery Today · doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2025.104382 · Cited by 9
A non-redundant benchmark for symmetric protein docking
Yan, Y., & Huang, S. (2019) · Big Data Mining and Analytics · doi:10.26599/bdma.2018.9020035 · Cited by 9
Rodrigues, C. H. M., & Ascher, D. B. (2023) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.26615 · Cited by 9
Focused grid‐based resampling for protein docking and mapping
Mamonov, A. B., Moghadasi, M., Mirzaei, H., Zarbafian, S., Grove, L. E., Bohnuud, T., Vakili, P., Paschalidis, I. C., Vajda, S., & Kozakov, D. (2016) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.24273 · Cited by 9
Yang, Y. X., & Gong, X. (2017) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2017.09.026 · Cited by 9
Unique Physicochemical Patterns of Residues in Protein–Protein Interfaces
Lázár, T., Guharoy, M., Schád, É., & Tompa, P. (2018) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.8b00270 · Cited by 10
ProInterVal: Validation of Protein–Protein Interfaces through Learned Interface Representations
Ovek, D., Keskin, O., & Gursoy, A. (2024) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.3c01788 · Cited by 8
Quantum Chemistry-Based Protein–Protein Docking without Empirical Parameters
Kousaka, S., & Ishikawa, T. (2024) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.4c00531 · Cited by 8
Alam, R., Mahbub, S., & Bayzid, M. S. (2024) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btae588 · Cited by 8
Inclusion of Desolvation Energy into Protein–Protein Docking through Atomic Contact Potentials
Li, H., Yan, Y., Zhao, X., & Huang, S. (2022) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.1c01483 · Cited by 8
FTDMP : A Framework for Protein–Protein, Protein– DNA, and Protein– RNA Docking and Scoring
Olechnovič, K., Banciul, R., Dapkūnas, J., & Venclovas, Č. (2025) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.26792 · Cited by 9
Dockground Tool for Development and Benchmarking of Protein Docking Procedures
Kundrotas, P. J., Kotthoff, I., Choi, S. W., Copeland, M. M., & Vakser, I. A. (2020) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-0716-0708-4_17 · Cited by 8
Improved cluster ranking in protein–protein docking using a regression approach
Sotudian, S., Desta, I., Hashemi, N., Zarbafian, S., Kozakov, D., Vakili, P., Vajda, S., & Paschalidis, I. C. (2021) · Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1016/j.csbj.2021.04.028 · Cited by 9
Zhang, W., Meng, Q., Tang, J., & Guo, F. (2021) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbab150 · Cited by 8
Integrated structure-based protein interface prediction
Walder, M., Edelstein, E., Carroll, M., Lazarev, S., Fajardo, J. E., Fiser, A., & Viswanathan, R. (2022) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/s12859-022-04852-2 · Cited by 8
Determining Complex Structures using Docking Method with Single Particle Scattering Data
Wang, H., & Liu, H. (2017) · Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences · doi:10.3389/fmolb.2017.00023 · Cited by 8
Khazen, G., Gyulkhandanian, A., Issa, T., & Maroun, R. C. (2021) · Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1016/j.csbj.2021.09.013 · Cited by 8
RosettaSurf—A surface-centric computational design approach
Scheck, A., Rosset, S., Defferrard, M., Loukas, A., Bonet, J., Vandergheynst, P., & Correia, B. E. (2022) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009178 · Cited by 8
McKinney, B., Meyer, P. A., Crosas, M., & Piotr Sliz, A. (2016) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/nyas.13272 · Cited by 8
Morphing and docking visualisation of biomolecular structures using Multi-Dimensional Scaling
Veevers, R., & Hayward, S. (2018) · Journal of Molecular Graphics and Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.jmgm.2018.04.013 · Cited by 8
Reliable protein-protein docking with AlphaFold, Rosetta, and replica-exchangePreprint
Harmalkar, A., Lyskov, S., & Gray, J. J. (2024) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.94029.1 · Cited by 8
Han, J., Zhang, S., Guan, M., Li, Q., Gao, X., & Liu, J. (2024) · Structure · doi:10.1016/j.str.2024.10.011 · Cited by 7
Unified Sampling and Ranking for Protein Docking With DFMDock
Chu, L., Sarma, S., Xu, D., & Gray, J. J. (2026) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.70160 · Cited by 7
Antal, Z., Szövérfi, J., & Fejer, S. N. (2017) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.7b00078 · Cited by 7
Quadrini, M., Daberdaku, S., & Ferrari, C. (2020) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-64580-9_34 · Cited by 7
Scoring of protein–protein docking models utilizing predicted interface residues
Pozzati, G., Kundrotas, P. J., & Elofsson, A. (2022) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.26330 · Cited by 9
Properties that rank protein:protein docking poses with high accuracy
Simões, I. C. M., Coimbra, J. T. S., Neves, R. P. P., Costa, I. P. D., Ramos, M. J., & Fernandes, P. A. (2018) · Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics · doi:10.1039/c8cp03888k · Cited by 7
Atomic-level evolutionary information improves protein–protein interface scoring
Quignot, C., Granger, P., Chacón, P., Guérois, R., & Andréani, J. (2021) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btab254 · Cited by 9
McCafferty, C. L., Marcotte, E. M., & Taylor, D. W. (2020) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.26020 · Cited by 7
Renaud, N., Jung, Y. G., Honavar, V., Geng, C., Bonvin, A. M. J. J., & Xue, L. C. (2020) · SoftwareX · doi:10.1016/j.softx.2020.100462 · Cited by 7
Self-citationPoxvirus targeted by RFdiffusion peptide-bindersPreprint
Coll, J. M. (2025) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2025.05.14.654163 · Cited by 7
Guan, M., Han, J., Zhang, S., Zheng, H., & Liu, J. (2025) · Research · doi:10.34133/research.0773 · Cited by 6
Advances in protein-protein interaction prediction: a deep learning perspective
Alkhateeb, N. J., & Awad, M. (2026) · Frontiers in Bioinformatics · doi:10.3389/fbinf.2025.1710937 · Cited by 6
From Traditional Methods to Deep Learning Approaches: Advances in Protein–Protein Docking
Jiang, L., Zhang, K., Zhu, K., Zhang, H., Shen, C., & Hou, T. (2025) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Computational Molecular Science · doi:10.1002/wcms.70016 · Cited by 6
Discrimination and Prediction of Protein-Protein Binding Affinity Using Deep Learning Approach
Nikam, R., Yugandhar, K., & Gromiha, M. M. (2018) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-95933-7_89 · Cited by 6
Takemura, K., & Kitao, A. (2019) · Biophysics and Physicobiology · doi:10.2142/biophysico.16.0_295 · Cited by 6
Dockground scoring benchmarks for protein docking
Kotthoff, I., Kundrotas, P. J., & Vakser, I. A. (2022) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.26306 · Cited by 6
LEVELNET to visualize, explore, and compare protein–protein interaction networks
Behbahani, Y. M., Saighi, P., Corsi, F., Laine, É., & Carbone, A. (2023) · PROTEOMICS · doi:10.1002/pmic.202200159 · Cited by 7
Specificity of broad protein interaction surfaces for proteins with multiple binding partners
Uchikoga, N., Matsuzaki, Y., Ohue, M., & Akiyama, Y. (2016) · Biophysics and Physicobiology · doi:10.2142/biophysico.13.0_105 · Cited by 6
Yugandhar, K., & Gromiha, M. M. (2016) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-6406-2_16 · Cited by 7
Geometric and amino acid type determinants for protein‐protein interaction interfaces
Yang, Y. X., Wang, W., Lou, Y., Yin, J., & Gong, X. (2018) · Quantitative Biology · doi:10.1007/s40484-018-0138-5 · Cited by 6
MaSIF - Deciphering interaction fingerprints from protein molecular surfaces
Gaínza, P., Sverrisson, F., Monti, F., Rodolà, E., Bronstein, M. M., & Correia, B. E. (2019) · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · doi:10.5281/zenodo.2625419 · Cited by 6
Kawai, K., Karuo, Y., Tarui, A., Sato, K., & Omote, M. (2020) · Molecular Informatics · doi:10.1002/minf.201900126 · Cited by 6
Reliable protein-protein docking with AlphaFold, Rosetta, and replica-exchangePreprint
Harmalkar, A., Lyskov, S., & Gray, J. J. (2025) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.94029.2 · Cited by 6
Advancing membrane-associated protein docking with improved sampling and scoring in Rosetta
Samnata, R., Harmalkar, A., Prathima, P., & Gray, J. J. (2024) · doi:10.1101/2024.07.09.602802 · Cited by 5
Zhang, S., Han, J., & Liu, J. (2024) · GigaScience · doi:10.1093/gigascience/giae080 · Cited by 5
Transposable Elements Drive Regulatory and Functional Innovation of F-box Genes
Almeida, M. V., Li, Z., Rebelo‐Guiomar, P., Dallaire, A., Fiedler, L., Price, J. L., Sluka, J., Liu, X., Butter, F., Rödelsperger, C., et al. (2025) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msaf097 · Cited by 5
Beyond contacts: The important role of the support region in protein complex assembly
Miclot, T., & Timr, Š. (2026) · Protein Science · doi:10.1002/pro.70470 · Cited by 5
A computational framework for modeling functional protein‐protein interactions
Pal, A., Pal, D., & Mitra, P. (2021) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.26156 · Cited by 5
Barradas‐Bautista, D., Almajed, A., Oliva, R., Kalnis, P., & Cavallo, L. (2023) · Bioinformatics Advances · doi:10.1093/bioadv/vbad012 · Cited by 5
Geometric epitope and paratope prediction
Pegoraro, M., Dominé, C., Rodolà, E., Veličković, P., & Deac, A. (2024) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btae405 · Cited by 5
Zarbafian, S., Moghadasi, M., Roshandelpoor, A., Nan, F., Li, K., Vakli, P., Vajda, S., Kozakov, D., & Paschalidis, I. C. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-23982-3 · Cited by 5
Side-chain Packing Using SE(3)-Transformer
Jindal, A., Kotelnikov, S., Padhorny, D., Kozakov, D., Zhu, Y., Chowdhury, R., & Vajda, S. (2021) · Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing (PSB) · doi:10.1142/9789811250477_0005 · Cited by 5
Advanced computational tools for quantitative analysis of protein–nucleic acid interfaces
Mukherjee, S., & Nithin, C. (2022) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-323-90264-9.00011-8 · Cited by 5
Kanhasut, K., Tharakaraman, K., Ruchirawat, M., Satayavivad, J., Fuangthong, M., & Sasisekharan, R. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-18580-3 · Cited by 5
Gu, Y., Li, D., & Brüschweiler, R. (2017) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btx070 · Cited by 5
Hadi‐Alijanvand, H. (2019) · Journal of Proteome Research · doi:10.1021/acs.jproteome.9b00594 · Cited by 5
Poluri, K. M., Gulati, K., & Sarkar, S. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-16-1594-8_6 · Cited by 5
Computational design of protein complexes: influence of binding affinity
Ridha, F., Harini, K., Shanmugam, N. R. S., Nikam, R., & Gromiha, M. M. (2025) · Chemical Communications · doi:10.1039/d5cc04821d · Cited by 4
Multiscale chiral zeros in biomolecules
Moudgal, N., Ma, J., Emre, E. S. T., & Kotov, N. A. (2025) · Communications Chemistry · doi:10.1038/s42004-025-01808-4 · Cited by 4
Can we extract physics-like energies from generative protein diffusion Models?
Sarma, S., Truscott, H. H., Xu, D. Z., Reid, K. A., Chu, L., Chen, J. H. K., & Gray, J. J. (2026) · PRX Life · doi:10.1103/m7qr-gnjc · Cited by 5
Banerjee, M., Waghamare, N., Kalwani, P., Hurali, D. T., Agarwal, R., & Ballal, A. D. (2023) · Biochemical Journal · doi:10.1042/bcj20220524 · Cited by 4
Biswas, G., Mukherjee, D., Dutta, N., Ghosh, P., & Basu, S. (2023) · Journal of Molecular Modeling · doi:10.1007/s00894-023-05626-0 · Cited by 4
Structural quality of unrefined models in protein docking
Anishchenko, I. V., Kundrotas, P. J., & Vakser, I. A. (2016) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.25188 · Cited by 4
Partner-Specific Prediction of Protein-Dimer Stability from Unbound Structure of Monomer
Hadi‐Alijanvand, H., & Rouhani, M. (2018) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.7b00606 · Cited by 4
Zhao, Z., & Gong, X. (2019) · ACM International Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology, and Health Informatics (ACM-BCB) · doi:10.1145/3307339.3343864 · Cited by 4
G-RANK: an equivariant graph neural network for the scoring of protein–protein docking models
Kim, H. Y., Kim, S., Park, W., & Kim, D. (2023) · Bioinformatics Advances · doi:10.1093/bioadv/vbad011 · Cited by 4
Rescore protein-protein docked ensembles with an interface contact statistics
Mezei, M. (2016) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.25209 · Cited by 4
Smith, J. K., Jiang, S., & Pfaendtner, J. (2017) · Langmuir · doi:10.1021/acs.langmuir.7b02438 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Vreven, T., Moal, I. H., Vangone, A., Pierce, B. G., Kastritis, P. L., Torchala, M., Chaleil, R., Jiménez-García, B., Bates, P. A., Fernandez-Recio, J., Bonvin, A. M. J. J., & Weng, Z.
- Affiliations
- University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School (US)
- Barcelona Supercomputing Center (ES)
- Utrecht University (NL)
- The Francis Crick Institute (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Bates, Paul A.
- Bonvin, Alexandre M.J.J.
- Weng, Zhiping
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Molecular Biology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-09
- Volume
- 427
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- 3031-3041
- ISSN
- 0022-2836 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC4677049
- OpenAlex
- W1030883578
- Cited by
- 424
- References
- 70
- Citations by year
- 2026: 28 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 45 · 2022: 58 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 40 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 23
- FWCI
- 13.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Journal of Molecular Biology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
- UPCommons institutional repository (Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
- eScholarship@UMassChan (submittedVersion)
- Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- RECERCAT (Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
- Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Cancer Research UK (10748)
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM084884)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Enzyme Structure and Function
- Keywords
- protein-protein docking, binding affinity prediction, docking benchmark, protein-protein complex, immune complexes, rigid-body docking
- MeSH terms
- Algorithms, Animals, Humans, Polynucleotide Adenylyltransferase, Protein Binding, Protein Conformation, Proteins, Software, Thermodynamics, Vaccinia virus, Viral Proteins, Protein Interaction Mapping, Molecular Docking Simulation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review