Cited by 114Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum DisordersAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

Common pitfalls in exposure and response prevention (EX/RP) for OCD

Open access
Gillihan, Seth J., Williams, Monnica T., Malcoun, Emily, Yadin, Elna, Foa, Edna B.·2012·Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders

Abstract

Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a highly debilitating disorder. Fortunately there are treatments that help the majority of OCD sufferers. The behavioral treatment with the most empirical support for its efficacy is exposure and response prevention (EX/RP). Over the years in our supervision meetings and in our clinical practice we have noted a number of relatively common therapist pitfalls that decrease the effectiveness of EX/RP. These pitfalls include not encouraging patients to approach the most distressing situations, doing imaginal exposure when in vivo is called for (and vice versa), encouraging distraction during exposure, providing reassurance, failing to address the core fear, ineffective handling of mental compulsions, and difficulty working with close others in the patient's life. In the current article we describe these common pitfalls and how to avoid them.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jocrd.2012.05.002

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Participants in the CBT + ERP arm may have engaged in competing responses, such as distraction.

    “Similarly, partici­ pants in the CBT + ERP arm may have engaged in competing responses, such as distraction”

    From Habit as a therapeutic component in psychological treatment for obsessive-compulsive disorder: A randomised controlled feasibility study. (2026) · cites this paper as [73]

    Section 4, “Encouraging Distraction During Exposure” (page unavailable), says patients may distract themselves during EX/RP, intentionally or not. It does not address participants in the particular CBT + ERP arm or establish that they engaged in distraction. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Helping clients avoid difficult exposures can be harmful and can increase the likelihood of relapse.

    “In fact, helping clients avoid difficult exposures can be harmful and increase the likelihood of relapse (Gillihan, Williams, Malcoun, Yadin, & Foa, 2012).”

    From Enhancing Inhibitory Learning: The Utility of Variability in Exposure (2019) · cites this paper as Gillihan, Williams, Malcoun, Yadin, & Foa, 2012

  • Clinicians are susceptible to making errors in how they deliver ERP, which inhibits its effectiveness.

    “clinicians are susceptible to making errors in how they deliver the treatment to patients, which likewise inhibits its effectiveness.[29]”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 39 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gillihan, S. J., Williams, M. T., Malcoun, E., Yadin, E., & Foa, E. B.
Affiliations
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • University of Louisville (US)
Corresponding author
Gillihan, Seth J.
Venue
Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-10
Volume
1
Issue
4
Pages
251-257
ISSN
2211-3649 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2106318534
Cited by
114
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 6
FWCI
5.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH045404)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
exposure and response prevention, obsessive-compulsive disorder, imaginal exposure, in vivo exposure, reassurance, treatment supervision, behavior therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review