Cited by 88Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentMental Health Treatment and AccessTreatment of Major Depression

Childhood onset major depressive disorder: course of illness and psychiatric comorbidity in a community sample

Korczak, Daphne J., Goldstein, Benjamin I.·2009·The Journal of Pediatrics

Abstract

Objective To examine the effect of childhood-onset major depressive disorder (MDD) on course of illness and psychiatric comorbidity, as compared with adolescent- and adult-onset MDD, in a large nonclinical sample.Study design This study included 6778 civilian noninstitutionalized participants in the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions with nonpsychotic, non-substance-induced MDD. Subjects were divided into 3 groups on the basis of age at first episode of MDD: childhood-onset (CHLD; onset < or =12 yrs, n = 372), adolescent-onset (ADOL; onset 13 to 17 years, n = 854), and adult-onset (ADLT; onset > or =18 years, n = 5552).Results Compared with subjects with ADLT, CHLD MDD was associated with a greater number of MDD episodes, longer episode duration, increased suicidality, and increased need for hospitalization for MDD compared with adult-onset illness. Subjects with CHLD had a higher rate of psychiatric comorbidity and were more likely to have a parental history of MDD. Among subjects treated for MDD, latency from MDD onset to treatment was greater among subjects with CHLD compared with subjects with ADLT. Data for subjects with ADOL was intermediate to those of subjects with CHLD and ADLT.Conclusions This epidemiologic study confirms and extends clinical findings of childhood-onset MDD as a more familial form of illness associated with increased comorbidity, suicidality, and treatment use.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpeds.2009.01.061

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 39 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Korczak, D. J., & Goldstein, B. I.
Affiliations
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
Corresponding author
Korczak, Daphne J.
Venue
The Journal of Pediatrics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-07
Volume
155
Issue
1
Pages
118-123
ISSN
0022-3476 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1971604762
Cited by
88
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 2
FWCI
3.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Pediatrics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
Keywords
adolescent-onset depression, clinical course, psychiatric comorbidity, suicidality, hospitalization, treatment delay, age of onset, NESARC
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Anxiety Disorders, Child, Commitment of Mentally Ill, Commitment of Persons with Psychiatric Disorders, Depressive Disorder, Major, Major Depressive Disorder, Emergency Service, Hospital, Female, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Male, Middle Aged, Parents, Personality Disorders, Sampling Studies, Suicide, Attempted, United States, Comorbidity, Age of Onset, Dysthymic Disorder, Substance-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review