Cited by 140Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychometric Methodologies and TestingMental Health Research Topics

Psychometrics of a brief measure of anxiety to detect severity and impairment: The overall anxiety severity and impairment scale (OASIS)

Open access
Norman, Sonya B., Campbell-Sills, Laura, Hitchcock, Carla A., Sullivan, Sarah, Rochlin, Alexis, Wilkins, Kendall C., Stein, Murray B.·2011·Journal of Psychiatric Research

Abstract

Brief measures of anxiety-related severity and impairment that can be used across anxiety disorders and with subsyndromal anxiety are lacking. The Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale (OASIS) have shown strong psychometric properties with college students and primary care patients. This study examines sensitivity, specificity, and efficiency of an abbreviated version of the OASIS that takes only 2-3 min to complete using a non-clinical (college student) sample. 48 participants completed the OASIS and SCID for anxiety disorders, 21 had a diagnosis of ≥1 anxiety disorder, and 4 additional participants had a subthreshold diagnosis. A cut-score of 8 best discriminated those with anxiety disorders from those without, successfully classifying 78% of the sample with 69% sensitivity and 74% specificity. Results from a larger sample (n = 171) showed a single factor structure and excellent convergent and divergent validity. The availability of cut-scores for a non-clinical sample furthers the utility of this measure for settings where screening or brief assessment of anxiety is needed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2010.06.011

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Derogatis LR Brief Symptom Inventory: Administration, scoring, and procedures manual Minneapolis, MN NCS Pearson, Inc 1993
  2. Spielberger CD Gorsuch RL Lushene RE Manual for the stait-trait anxiety inventory Palo Alto, CA Consulting Psychologists Press 1970

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Norman, S. B., Campbell-Sills, L., Hitchcock, C. A., Sullivan, S., Rochlin, A., Wilkins, K. C., & Stein, M. B.
Affiliations
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • Alliant University (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • San Diego State University (US)
Corresponding author
Norman, Sonya B.
Venue
Journal of Psychiatric Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-02
Volume
45
Issue
2
Pages
262-268
ISSN
0022-3956 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2039588780
Cited by
140
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Psychiatric Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (K23AA015707)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH-64122, MH 65413, K24MH064122, R01MH065413, MH057835)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
Keywords
anxiety levels, cut-off values, sensitivity and specificity, factor structure, convergent validity, subthreshold anxiety, university students, primary care, anxiety disorders
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Anxiety, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychometrics, Sensitivity and Specificity, Statistics as Topic, Reproducibility of Results, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review