Cited by 35Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychometric Methodologies and TestingMental Health Research Topics

Capturing the severity and impairment associated with depression: the overall depression severity and impairment scale (ODSIS) validation in a Spanish clinical sample

Open access
Mira, Adriana, González-Robles, Alberto, Molinari, Guadalupe, Miguel, Clara, Díaz-García, Amanda, Bretón-López, Juana, García-Palacios, Azucena, Quero, Soledad +2 more·2019·Frontiers in Psychiatry

Abstract

Background: The Overall Depression Severity and Impairment Scale (ODSIS) is a self-report scale designed to evaluate the severity and functional impairment associated with depression. Objective: This study evaluated the psychometric properties of the online version of the ODSIS in Spanish outpatients with depression and anxiety disorders. Method: Patients with a main diagnosis of a depressive (n = 283) or anxiety disorder (n = 191) and a mean age of 38.15 (SD = 12.06) were evaluated with a clinical diagnostic interview and measures assessing depression, anxiety, positive and negative affect, and quality of life. Factorial structure, internal consistency, convergent and discriminant validity and cutoff scores were analyzed. Results: Consistent with previous validations of the instrument, Confirmatory Factor Analysis showed a unidimensional factor structure. Furthermore, the results obtained supported the internal consistency and construct validity of the ODSIS scores. A score of 5 was found to meet the criteria used in this study for the optimal cutoff score. Conclusion: The results obtained in this study show that the Spanish version of the ODSIS delivered online is an adequate tool to assess the depression-related severity and impairment in a brief and easy fashion.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00180

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [20]American Psychiatric Association Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-V) (Fifth Edition). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association (2013).
  2. [40]Yu CY Evaluating Cutoff Criteria of Model fit Indices for Latent Variable Models with Binary and Continuous Outcomes (Vol. 30). Los Angeles, CA: University of California (2002).
  3. [42]Argimon JM Jiménez J Métodos de Investigaciónclí nica y Epidemiológica. 4th ed. Barcelona: Elsevier España (2013).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mira, A., González-Robles, A., Molinari, G., Miguel, C., Díaz-García, A., Bretón-López, J., García-Palacios, A., Quero, S., Baños, R., & Botella, C.
Affiliations
  • Universitat Jaume I (ES)
  • Universitat de València (ES)
Corresponding author
Mira, Adriana
Venue
Frontiers in Psychiatry
Published
2019-04-09
Volume
10
Pages
180-180
ISSN
1664-0640 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2937349003
Cited by
35
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1
FWCI
2.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Repositori UJI (Universitat Jaume I) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • VU Research Portal (submittedVersion)
  • Zaguan (University of Zaragoza Repository) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad
  • Instituto de Salud Carlos III
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
Keywords
depression severity, functional disability, psychometric validation, Spanish translation, anxiety disorders, outpatients, cut-off values, factor structure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review