Cited by 88Treatment of Major DepressionAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMental Health Treatment and Access

Anxious distress predicts subsequent treatment outcome and side effects in depressed patients starting antidepressant treatment

Gaspersz, Roxanne, Lamers, Femke, Kent, Justine M., Beekman, Aartjan T.F., Smit, Johannes H., van Hemert, Albert M., Schoevers, Robert A., Penninx, Brenda W.J.H.·2017·Journal of Psychiatric Research

Abstract

Evidence has shown that the DSM-5 anxious distress specifier captures a clinically valid construct that predicts a worse clinical course. Although of importance for treatment planning and monitoring, however, the specifier's ability to predict treatment outcome is unknown. This is the first study to examine the ability of the DSM-5 anxious distress specifier to predict treatment response and side effects in depressed patients who recently initiated antidepressant treatment. Patients were from the Netherlands Study of Depression and Anxiety, an ongoing longitudinal cohort study. Baseline, 1-year and 2-year follow-up data were used from 149 patients (18-65 years) with current Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) who recently started adequately dosed antidepressant medication. Five self-report items were used to construct the DSM-5 anxious distress specifier. Treatment outcomes were depression severity after 1 year and 2 years, remission of MDD after 2 years and antidepressant side effects during treatment. For comparison, analyses were repeated for comorbid DSM-IV-based anxiety disorders as a predictor. In depressed patients who received antidepressant treatment, the anxious distress specifier (prevalence = 59.1%) significantly predicted higher severity (1 year: B = 1.94, P = 0.001; 2 years: B = 1.63, P = 0.001), lower remission rates (OR = 0.44, P = 0.0496) and greater frequency of side effects (≥4 vs. 0: OR = 2.74, P = 0.061). In contrast, the presence of comorbid anxiety disorders did not predict these treatment outcomes. The anxious distress specifier significantly predicts poorer treatment outcomes as shown by higher depression severity, lower remission rates, and greater frequency of antidepressant side effects in patients with MDD on adequate antidepressant treatment. Therefore, this simple 5-item specifier is of potential great clinical usefulness for treatment planning and monitoring in depressed patients.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2016.09.018

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gaspersz, R., Lamers, F., Kent, J. M., Beekman, A. T. F., Smit, J. H., van Hemert, A. M., Schoevers, R. A., & Penninx, B. W. J. H.
Affiliations
  • Amsterdam Public Health (NL)
  • University Medical Center Groningen (NL)
Corresponding author
Gaspersz, Roxanne
Venue
Journal of Psychiatric Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-01
Volume
84
Pages
41-48
ISSN
0022-3956 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2521670955
Cited by
88
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 4
FWCI
7.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Psychiatric Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • International Business Machines Corporation
  • ZonMw
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
anxious distress, major depressive disorder, antidepressant treatment outcome, antidepressant side effects, depression severity, remission, comorbid anxiety disorders, treatment response prediction, treatment planning
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Antidepressive Agents, Anxiety, Major Depressive Disorder, Depressive Disorder, Major, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Netherlands, Prognosis, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Severity of Illness Index, Stress, Psychological, Treatment Outcome, Young Adult, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review