Cited by 518Personality Disorders and PsychopathologyPersonality Traits and PsychologyBipolar Disorder and Treatment

An experimental investigation of emotion dysregulation in borderline personality disorder

Gratz, Kim L., Rosenthal, M. Zachary, Tull, Matthew T., Lejuez, C. W., Gunderson, John G.·2006·Journal of Abnormal Psychology

Abstract

Despite the prominent role of emotion dysregulation in theoretical accounts of borderline personality disorder (BPD), few studies have examined emotion dysregulation in BPD. This study extends extant research by providing an experimental investigation of emotion dysregulation among outpatients with BPD. Specifically, this study modified an experimental measure of distress tolerance to examine differences between outpatients with BPD (n = 17) and those without a personality disorder (n = 18) in 2 aspects of emotion dysregulation: (a) the unwillingness to experience emotional distress in order to pursue goal-directed behavior and (b) the inability to engage in goal-directed behavior when distressed. As hypothesized, BPD participants were less willing to experience distress in order to pursue goal-directed behavior. However, BPD participants did not evidence greater difficulties engaging in goal-directed behavior when distressed. Results highlight directions for future research and suggest that particular aspects of emotion dysregulation may be more or less relevant to BPD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0021-843x.115.4.850

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 16 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gratz, K. L., Rosenthal, M. Z., Tull, M. T., Lejuez, C. W., & Gunderson, J. G.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Duke Medical Center (US)
  • VA Boston Healthcare System (US)
  • University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Venue
Journal of Abnormal Psychology
Published
2006-11
Volume
115
Issue
4
Pages
850-855
ISSN
  • 0021-843X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1846
OpenAlex
W2026768605
Cited by
518
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 38 · 2014: 42 · 2013: 36 · 2012: 42
FWCI
17.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Abnormal Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
McLean Hospital
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
Keywords
borderline personality disorder, emotional dysregulation, distress tolerance, goal-directed behavior, emotional distress, outpatients, personality disorders
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Borderline Personality Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychological Theory, Surveys and Questionnaires, Severity of Illness Index, Mood Disorders, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review