Cited by 48Cancer survivorship and careMental Health Treatment and AccessTreatment of Major Depression

Prevention of depression in patients with cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Zahid, Jawad Ahmad, Grummedal, Ole, Madsen, Michael Tvilling, Gögenur, Ismail·2020·Journal of Psychiatric Research

Abstract

Depression and depressive symptoms are prevalent in patients with cancer. Depression is underdiagnosed and therefore, patients often receive inadequate treatment for depression. We have assessed the evidence of primary prophylactic treatment for depression in patients with cancer. The systematic review was prospectively registered at PROSPERO and was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis guidelines. Five electronic databases were searched on the 31st of May 2018 and two independent reviewers screened the papers. Randomized controlled trials of adult patients with cancer treated prophylactically with an antidepressive intervention of any kind using validated assessment tools to measure depression or depressive symptoms were included. No language or publication year restrictions were applied. Seven out of eighteen studies reported a statistically significant prophylactic effect on depression. The studies were classified into three groups based on the type of intervention. The meta-analyses showed a significant difference in favour of pharmacotherapy (RR 0.34, 95% CI 0.18; 0.63), psychotherapy (SMD -0.23,95% CI -0.46; 0.00), and other interventions (SMD -0.17, 95% CI -0.31; -0.03). Only one study had overall low risk of bias and the rest had high risk of bias predominantly due to blinding, incomplete data, or allocation concealment. Preventive measures have been examined in patients with cancer, but no convincing evidence for any specific intervention is present. Depression in patients with cancer can be prevented and prophylactic treatment should be given during oncological treatment but further high quality studies testing safe interventions are still needed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2019.10.009

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 62 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zahid, J. A., Grummedal, O., Madsen, M. T., & Gögenur, I.
Affiliations
Zealand University Hospital (DK)
Corresponding author
Zahid, Jawad Ahmad
Venue
Journal of Psychiatric Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-01
Volume
120
Pages
113-123
ISSN
0022-3956 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2981242733
Cited by
48
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4
FWCI
0.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Psychiatric Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
Keywords
depression prevention, cancer patients, depressive symptoms, antidepressant prophylaxis, pharmacotherapy, psychotherapy, underdiagnosis of depression, risk of bias
MeSH terms
Antidepressive Agents, Depression, Depressive Disorder, Humans, Neoplasms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review