Cited by 897Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome ResearchLong-Term Effects of COVID-19Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation

Comparison of adaptive pacing therapy, cognitive behaviour therapy, graded exercise therapy, and specialist medical care for chronic fatigue syndrome (PACE): a randomised trial

Open access
White, PD, Goldsmith, KA, Johnson, AL, Potts, L, Walwyn, R, DeCesare, JC, Baber, HL, Burgess, M +11 more·2011·The Lancet

Abstract

Background Trial findings show cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) and graded exercise therapy (GET) can be effective treatments for chronic fatigue syndrome, but patients' organisations have reported that these treatments can be harmful and favour pacing and specialist health care. We aimed to assess effectiveness and safety of all four treatments.Methods In our parallel-group randomised trial, patients meeting Oxford criteria for chronic fatigue syndrome were recruited from six secondary-care clinics in the UK and randomly allocated by computer-generated sequence to receive specialist medical care (SMC) alone or with adaptive pacing therapy (APT), CBT, or GET. Primary outcomes were fatigue (measured by Chalder fatigue questionnaire score) and physical function (measured by short form-36 subscale score) up to 52 weeks after randomisation, and safety was assessed primarily by recording all serious adverse events, including serious adverse reactions to trial treatments. Primary outcomes were rated by participants, who were necessarily unmasked to treatment assignment; the statistician was masked to treatment assignment for the analysis of primary outcomes. We used longitudinal regression models to compare SMC alone with other treatments, APT with CBT, and APT with GET. The final analysis included all participants for whom we had data for primary outcomes. This trial is registered at http://isrctn.org, number ISRCTN54285094.Findings We recruited 641 eligible patients, of whom 160 were assigned to the APT group, 161 to the CBT group, 160 to the GET group, and 160 to the SMC-alone group. Compared with SMC alone, mean fatigue scores at 52 weeks were 3·4 (95% CI 1·8 to 5·0) points lower for CBT (p = 0·0001) and 3·2 (1·7 to 4·8) points lower for GET (p = 0·0003), but did not differ for APT (0·7 [-0·9 to 2·3] points lower; p = 0·38). Compared with SMC alone, mean physical function scores were 7·1 (2·0 to 12·1) points higher for CBT (p = 0·0068) and 9·4 (4·4 to 14·4) points higher for GET (p = 0·0005), but did not differ for APT (3·4 [-1·6 to 8·4] points lower; p=0·18). Compared with APT, CBT and GET were associated with less fatigue (CBT p = 0·0027; GET p = 0·0059) and better physical function (CBT p=0·0002; GET p<0·0001). Subgroup analysis of 427 participants meeting international criteria for chronic fatigue syndrome and 329 participants meeting London criteria for myalgic encephalomyelitis yielded equivalent results. Serious adverse reactions were recorded in two (1%) of 159 participants in the APT group, three (2%) of 161 in the CBT group, two (1%) of 160 in the GET group, and two (1%) of 160 in the SMC-alone group.Interpretation CBT and GET can safely be added to SMC to moderately improve outcomes for chronic fatigue syndrome, but APT is not an effective addition.Funding UK Medical Research Council, Department of Health for England, Scottish Chief Scientist Office, Department for Work and Pensions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(11)60096-2

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) has been shown to reduce symptoms and increase functioning in adults with FSS.

    “Cognitive–behavioural therapy (CBT) has been shown to reduce symptoms and increase functioning in adults with FSS,27–30”

    From Comparing group-based acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) with enhanced usual care for adolescents with functional somatic syndromes: A study protocol for a randomised trial (2016) · cites this paper as [28]

    The Results report less fatigue and better physical function after CBT than after specialist medical care alone in adults with chronic fatigue syndrome. The trial studied chronic fatigue syndrome specifically, so it does not establish the claim for adults with FSS more broadly. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • CBT improves physical functioning and fatigue reduction immediately and some time after treatment in patients with CFS.

    “Research has shown that CBT improves physical functioning and fatigue reduction immediately and some time after treatment [9,10].”

    From Cognitive behavior therapy in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome: The role of illness acceptance and neuroticism. (2013) · cites this paper as [9]

    The Results report less fatigue and better physical function after CBT than after adaptive pacing therapy or specialist medical care alone, including at 52 weeks. Methods > Procedures identifies 24 weeks as the post-therapy assessment, but the available Results passage does not state the CBT effects separately at that immediate post-treatment point. The claim’s later effect is supported; its immediate effect is not established by these passages. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • CBT aimed at increasing functioning, and its objective and content are comparable with manuals of other CBT trials.

    “CBT aimed at increasing functioning, and its objective and content are comparable with manuals of other CBT trials [9,12].”

    From Cognitive behavior therapy in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome: The role of illness acceptance and neuroticism. (2013) · cites this paper as [9]

    The Discussion describes CBT as encouraging gradual increases in activity, and the Results report improved physical function after CBT, supporting the account of its aim. The Methods > Procedures and Results discuss adherence to the PACE treatment manuals, but our copy does not compare their objectives or content with manuals from other CBT trials. Page numbers were not available in the indexed passages. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Graded exercise is considered an important element in treatment and has been found effective for chronic fatigue syndrome.

    “The introduction to graded exercise as a means of moderating maladaptive illness behaviour and increasing physical function is also considered an important element in the treatment and has been found effective for chronic fatigue syndrome [21].”
  • CBT has been adapted and tested with CFS patients yielding superior results compared to standard medical treatment, relaxation, and adaptive pacing therapy, with moderate effect sizes (d = 0.48).

    “CBT has been adapted and tested with CFS patients yielding superior results compared to standard medical treatment, relaxation, and adaptive pacing therapy (Sharpe et al., 1996; Deale et al., 1997; White et al., 2011), with moderate effect sizes (d = 0.48) (Malouff et al., 2008).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [14]First MB Spitzer RL Gibbon M Williams JBW Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV-TR axis I disorders, research version, patient edition with psychotic screen (SCID-I/P W/ PSY SCREEN) 2002 Biometrics Research, New York State Psychiatric Institute New York

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
White, P., Goldsmith, K., Johnson, A., Potts, L., Walwyn, R., DeCesare, J., Baber, H., Burgess, M., Clark, L., Cox, D., Bavinton, J., Angus, B., Murphy, G., Murphy, M., O'Dowd, H., Wilks, D., McCrone, P., Chalder, T., & Sharpe, M.
Affiliations
  • King's College London (GB)
  • Queen Mary University of London (GB)
  • South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • Barts Health NHS Trust (GB)
  • John Radcliffe Hospital (GB)
  • The Royal Free Hospital (GB)
  • Western General Hospital (GB)
  • University of Edinburgh (GB)
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-03
Volume
377
Issue
9768
Pages
823-836
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W2136415723
Cited by
897
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 54 · 2023: 47 · 2022: 48 · 2021: 61 · 2020: 56 · 2019: 55 · 2018: 52 · 2017: 84 · 2016: 75 · 2015: 78 · 2014: 52 · 2013: 67 · 2012: 60
FWCI
47.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Insight (University of Cumbria) (acceptedVersion)
  • LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
  • UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (submittedVersion)
Funders
the UK Medical Research Council (MRC G0200434)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Keywords
chronic fatigue syndrome, cognitive behavioral therapy, graded exercise therapy, specialist care, fatigue, physical function, treatment safety, adverse events, PACE trial, treatment effectiveness comparison, patient-reported outcomes, Chalder Fatigue Questionnaire, SF-36 physical functioning, serious adverse events
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Adaptation, Physiological, Adult, Exercise Therapy, Female, Humans, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Specialization, Fatigue Syndrome, Chronic, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review